measure standard (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

measure standard in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1893–1979 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Wilbur v. City of Springfieldgreen
ill · 1888 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1893–1893
1 sentence

1893See Wilbur et al. v. Springfield, 123 Ill. 395 , and cases cited.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Green v. Osgood-Lewis-Perkins, Inc. green
scotus · 1966
1 sentence

1979Ed. 2d 209 , 86 S. Ct. 1204 , the measure of standard of care for a hospital was extended to include not only usual community practice, as in a case against a physician, but also administrative standards and bylaws.

11979–1979
Bederman v. Pollution Control Board neutral
illappct · 1974
1 sentence

1976App. 3d 31, 35 , 316 N.E.2d 785 , it is said: “Neither the courts nor administrative bodies may set up a dollar figure as to what constitutes financial hardship.” Neither party has cited, nor can we discover, any authorities which establish a specific measure or standard of economic loss which aids in determining the hardship contemplated by a statute.

11976–1976
Bode v. Barrett green
ill · 1952
1 sentence

1968Ed. 567 , stating that “even when the tax is imposed upon a nonresident and wholly with respect to interstate commerce, a State may tax the full measure of the privilege granted regardless of how little the privilege is exploited.” 412 Ill. at 226 .

11968–1968
Hicklin v. Coney green
scotus · 1933
1 sentence

1952In Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169 , the Supreme Court of the United States sustained a State automobile license tax upon a nonresident who was compelled to pay a tax of $400 for a single trip into the State with a single vehicle.

11952–1952

Where else courts name it

TX 19 (1924–2015) CA 17 (1906–2022) NY 12 (1893–2025) PA 8 (1933–2022) WA 8 (1968–2006) KY 7 (1922–1982) MO 7 (1889–2008) LA 6 (1939–2004) MD 5 (1839–2011) OR 5 (1917–2019) IL 5 (1893–1979) KS 4 (2008–2010) CT 4 (1938–1998) FL 3 (1985–2010) AL 3 (2000–2009) MT 3 (1925–2017) ME 2 (1949–2009) MA 2 (1994–1995) MN 2 (1891–1938) NJ 2 (1996–1997) IA 2 (2019–2025) AZ 2 (1969–1975) NC 2 (1895–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check