Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMgreen2 sentences2009See Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286, 291-92 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999) ("[T]his Court has indicated that the liberty component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause includes some generalized due process right to choose one's field of private employment, but a right which is nevertheless subject to reasonable government regulation.”); Schware v. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) ("A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, 2009See Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286, 291-92 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999) ("[T]his Court has indicated that the liberty component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause includes some generalized due process right to choose one's field of private employment, but a right which is nevertheless subject to reasonable government regulation.”); Schware v. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) ("A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, | 1 | 2 |
Merrill v. Stategreen2 sentences1972Any ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence or in any other proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original, supplemental, or amended application. . 457 P.2d at 238 . . 1972The order made by the court is a final judgment. [6] 457 P.2d 231 (Alaska 1969). [7] Alaska R.Crim.P. 35(i) provides: All grounds for relief available to an applicant under this rule must be raised in his original, supplemental or amended application. | 1 | 2 |
Keller v. Frenchgreen1 sentence2025(Emphasis added.) But 22 AAC 20.150(n) provides that “[a]n attorney may represent the applicant at the hearing,” though it disclaims any responsibility of the Parole Board or Department of Corrections to arrange or pay for such representation. 38 22 AAC 20.100(b) (“[T]he board will not permit the appearance of witnesses at discretionary parole hearings,” except that “[t]he board may make a rare exception due to exigent circumstances.”). 39 See Keller v. French, 205 P.3d 299, 302 (Alaska 2009) (noting “courts should not resolve abstract questions or issue advisory opinions”). – 11 – 2811 Judge | 1 | 1 |
Conn v. Gabbertgreen2 sentences2009See Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286, 291-92 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999) ("[T]his Court has indicated that the liberty component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause includes some generalized due process right to choose one's field of private employment, but a right which is nevertheless subject to reasonable government regulation.”); Schware v. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) ("A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, 2009See Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286, 291-92 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999) ("[T]his Court has indicated that the liberty component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause includes some generalized due process right to choose one's field of private employment, but a right which is nevertheless subject to reasonable government regulation.”); Schware v. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) ("A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, | 1 | 1 |
Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn Nielsengreen1 sentence2009See Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286, 291-92 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999) ("[T]his Court has indicated that the liberty component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause includes some generalized due process right to choose one's field of private employment, but a right which is nevertheless subject to reasonable government regulation.”); Schware v. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) ("A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, | 1 | 1 |
Union Oil Co. of California v. State, Department of Natural Resourcesgreen1 sentence1984Although in Forquer we recognized the right of an applicant to a hearing after a Commission determination on additional evidence, that holding does not establish that such a hearing is a prerequisite to judicial review on the merits of the Commission’s determination. “[Tjhere are situations in which one may possess the alternatives of either seeking judicial review directly from a decision of the [agency] or seeking review by the [agency] and then invoking judicial review.” Union Oil Company of California v. State, Department of Natural Resources, 526 P.2d 1357, 1365 (Alaska 1974). | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1972Any ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence or in any other proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original, supplemental, or amended application. [8] 457 P.2d at 238 . [9] Id. [10] 445 P.2d 815 (Alaska 1968). [11] Cf. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 17 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2 1972Any ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence or in any other proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original, supplemental, or amended application. [8] 457 P.2d at 238 . [9] Id. [10] 445 P.2d 815 (Alaska 1968). [11] Cf. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 17 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2 | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Stategreen1 sentence1972Any ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence or in any other proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original, supplemental, or amended application. [8] 457 P.2d at 238 . [9] Id. [10] 445 P.2d 815 (Alaska 1968). [11] Cf. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 17 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Malinowski
green
2 sentences1985Malinowski made the false claims as a means of protesting the Vietnam war, with full knowledge that he was unentitled to the additional exemptions. 347 F.Supp. at 350 . . 20 AAC 05.650(c) states: To use the special showing provisions in 20 AAC 05.630(a)(5) (for past participation), 20 AAC 05.630(b)(2) (for income dependence), and 20 AAC 05.630(b)(4)(D) (for availability of alternative occupations), an applicant must claim a specific number of points and must submit documentation of the facts and circumstance surrounding the claim along with his application for an entry permit. 1985Kjarstad alleges that the Washington applications were filled out for him in his absence by his employer, Wards Cove Packing Company, which was not aware of his move to Alaska. [6] Malinowski made the false claims as a means of protesting the Vietnam war, with full knowledge that he was unentitled to the additional exemptions. 347 F. Supp. at 350 . [7] 20 AAC 05.650(c) states: To use the special showing provisions in 20 AAC 05.630(a)(5) (for past participation), 20 AAC 05.630(b)(2) (for income dependence), and 20 AAC 05.630(b)(4)(D) (for availability of alternative occupations), an applicant m | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Faulkner v. State
green
1 sentence1972Any ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence or in any other proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original, supplemental, or amended application. [8] 457 P.2d at 238 . [9] Id. [10] 445 P.2d 815 (Alaska 1968). [11] Cf. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 17 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2 | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.