applicant claim in Connecticut

2001DISCUSSION "An applicant for intervention has a right to intervene under Practice Book [§] 99 [now § 9-18 ] where the applicant's interest is of such a direct and immediate character that the applicant will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment . . ." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Horton v. Meskill, 187 Conn. 187 , 195 , 445 A.2d 579 (1982). "[T]o qualify for intervention as of right . . . an applicant must thus meet each of four conditions: (1) The application must be timely. (2) The applicant must claim an interest relating to t

2001DISCUSSION "An applicant for intervention has a right to intervene under Practice Book [§] 99 [now § 9-18 ] where the applicant's interest is of such a direct and immediate character that the applicant will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment . . ." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Horton v. Meskill, 187 Conn. 187 , 195 , 445 A.2d 579 (1982). "[T]o qualify for intervention as of right . . . an applicant must thus meet each of four conditions: (1) The application must be timely. (2) The applicant must claim an interest relating to t

1993The conditions necessary to qualify for intervention as of right were set forth in State Board of Education v. Waterbury, 21 Conn. App. 67, 72 , 571 A.2d 148 (1990). 3 Intervention as of right requires that (1) the application be timely, (2) the applicant claim an interest relating to the transaction that is the subject of the action, (3) the applicant show that its ability to protect that interest may as a practical matter be impaired or impeded by disposition of the action, (4) the applicant’s interest is not adequately represented by the existing parties.

1993The conditions necessary to qualify for intervention as of right were set forth in State Board of Education v. Waterbury, 21 Conn. App. 67, 72 , 571 A.2d 148 (1990). 3 Intervention as of right requires that (1) the application be timely, (2) the applicant claim an interest relating to the transaction that is the subject of the action, (3) the applicant show that its ability to protect that interest may as a practical matter be impaired or impeded by disposition of the action, (4) the applicant’s interest is not adequately represented by the existing parties.

2002In re Application of Dodd, 131 Conn. 702, 707 , 42 A.2d 36 (1945).

2002In re Application of Dodd, 131 Conn. 702, 707 , 42 A.2d 36 (1945).

1992C “A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, but any qualifications must have a rational connection with the applicant’s fitness to practice law.” Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S. Ct. 752 , 1 L.

1992C “A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, but any qualifications must have a rational connection with the applicant’s fitness to practice law.” Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S. Ct. 752 , 1 L.

2010This ignores the durational connotations of the phrase "for ... five years...." In re Application of Slade, supra, 169 Conn. at 679 , 363 A.2d 1099 .

2010This ignores the durational connotations of the phrase "for ... five years...." In re Application of Slade, supra, 169 Conn. at 679 , 363 A.2d 1099 .

1993A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, but any qualification must have a rational connection with the applicant’s fitness or capacity to practice law.” (Emphasis added.) Id.; Scott v. State Bar Examining Committee, 220 Conn. 812, 820 , 601 A.2d 1021 (1992).

1993A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, but any qualification must have a rational connection with the applicant’s fitness or capacity to practice law.” (Emphasis added.) Id.; Scott v. State Bar Examining Committee, 220 Conn. 812, 820 , 601 A.2d 1021 (1992).

1993Conditions imposed by a zoning board must be expressed with sufficient clarity to give notice of the CT Page 4621 liens on the use of the land, and cannot incorporate by reference statements made by an applicant at a hearing." See also Dahar v. Dept. of Bldgs. of Manchester, 352 A.2d 404 (N.H. 1975), where an application for a variance for a six foot fence failed to mention an increase in ground grade where applicant erected an eight foot fence.

1993The court stated the latter violated the terms of the variance; Town of Warren v. Frost, 350 A.2d 608 (R.I. 1976); Proskin v. Donovan, 541 N.Y.S.2d 628 , (A.D.

1993The court stated the latter violated the terms of the variance; Town of Warren v. Frost, 350 A.2d 608 (R.I. 1976); Proskin v. Donovan, 541 N.Y.S.2d 628 , (A.D.

1993“Failure to meet any one of the conditions is sufficient to deny intervention as of right.” State Board of Education v. Waterbury, supra, citing NAACP v. New York, 413 U.S. 345, 369 , 93 S. Ct. 2591 , 37 L.

1993“Failure to meet any one of the conditions is sufficient to deny intervention as of right.” State Board of Education v. Waterbury, supra, citing NAACP v. New York, 413 U.S. 345, 369 , 93 S. Ct. 2591 , 37 L.

1988Cf. Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care, 196 Conn. 451 , 493 A.2d 229 (1985) (appeal pursuant to § 19a-158 from commission’s rejection of hospital’s budget proposal); Hospital of St.

1988Cf. Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care, 196 Conn. 451 , 493 A.2d 229 (1985) (appeal pursuant to § 19a-158 from commission’s rejection of hospital’s budget proposal); Hospital of St.