7 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbellgreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbell, 512 So.2d 725 (Ala.1987); Evans v. National Microsys., Inc., 576 So.2d 207 (Ala.1991). 2008See, e.g., Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbell, 512 So.2d 725 (Ala.1987); Evans v. National Microsys., Inc., 576 So.2d 207 (Ala.1991). | 1 | 1 |
Alabama Power Co. v. Aldridgegreen2 sentences2003While this Court has recognized that Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-11.1, is remedial legislation and, thus, that it should be construed liberally, it also has cautioned that courts must "refrain from construing § 25-5-11.1 in a manner that revises the at-will doctrine beyond the extent necessary to accommodate the obvious legislative purpose." Alabama Power Co. v. Aldridge, 854 So.2d 554, 562 (Ala.2002). 2003While this Court has recognized that Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11.1 , is remedial legislation and, thus, that it should be construed liberally, it also has cautioned that courts must "refrain from construing § 25-5-11.1 in a manner that revises the at-will doctrine beyond the extent necessary to accommodate the obvious legislative purpose." Alabama Power Co. v. Aldridge , 854 So.2d 554 , 562 (Ala. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Howard v. WOLFE BROADCASTING CORP.green1 sentence1997See Howard, 611 So.2d at 309-10 (explaining the at-will doctrine). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. National Beef Packing Co.green2 sentences1987See, e.g., Johnson v. National Beef Packing Co., 220 Kan. 52 , 551 P.2d 779 (1976); Shaw v. S.S. 1987See, e.g., Johnson v. National Beef Packing Co., 220 Kan. 52 , 551 P.2d 779 (1976); Shaw v. S.S. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bleier v. Wellington Sears Company
green
2 sentences2007However, at the same time, we must refrain from construing § 25-5-11.1 in a manner that revises the at-will doctrine beyond the extent necessary to accommodate the obvious legislative purpose." Bleier, 757 So.2d at 1169 . 2002However, at the same time, we must refrain from construing § 25-5-11.1 in a manner that revises the at-will doctrine beyond the extent necessary to accommodate the obvious legislative purpose." Bleier , 757 So.2d at 1168 -69 . | 2 | 2002–2007 |
Evans v. National Microsystems, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008See, e.g., Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbell, 512 So.2d 725 (Ala.1987); Evans v. National Microsys., Inc., 576 So.2d 207 (Ala.1991). 2008See, e.g., Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbell, 512 So.2d 725 (Ala.1987); Evans v. National Microsys., Inc., 576 So.2d 207 (Ala.1991). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens
green
1 sentence2003In Meeks , this Court referred to Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens , 379 So.2d 594 (Ala. 1980), in which the Court had refused to recognize an exception to the at-will doctrine for an employee who alleged that he had been fired because he had missed work to serve on a grand jury. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396
green
2 sentences1987To offset the harsh effect of the at-will doctrine and to afford workers a measure of job security, other courts have carved out exceptions to the common-law employment at-will doctrine (see, Petermann v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 174 Cal.App.2d 184 , 344 P.2d 25 ; Trombetta v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. 1987To offset the harsh effect of the at-will doctrine and to afford workers a measure of job security, other courts have carved out exceptions to the common-law employment at-will doctrine (see, Petermann v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 174 Cal.App.2d 184 , 344 P.2d 25 ; Trombetta v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Trombetta v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad
green
2 sentences1987Co., 81 Mich.App. 489 , 265 N.W.2d 385 ; Novosel v. Nationwide Ins. 1987Co., 81 Mich.App. 489 , 265 N.W.2d 385 ; Novosel v. Nationwide Ins. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.