6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gardner v. Loomis Armored Inc.green2 sentences2007Id. at 382 (citing Henry H. 2007Gardner, 913 P.2d at 385. -10- will not overly burden an employer’s ability to enforce work rules and make personnel decisions. | 1 | 1 |
Wiggins v. Southern Management Corp.green1 sentence2004See also Wiggins v. Southern Management Corporation, 629 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1993); Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1268 (1985); Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., v. Hedrich, 266 Ill.App.3d 24 , 203 Ill.Dec. 189 , 639 N.E.2d 228 (1994); Anderson v. Village of Oswego, 109 F.Supp.2d 930 (2000); Williams v. The Hillhaven Corporation, 91 N.C.App. 35 , 370 S.E.2d 423 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.green1 sentence2002Chism, 762 S.W.2d at 556 ; see also, e.g., Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co., 677 S.W.2d 441, 44445 (Tenn.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Morrisgreen1 sentence1997Smith v. Morris, 778 S.W.2d 857, 858 (Tenn. App. 1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Franklin v. Swift Transportation Co.
green
1 sentence2011VanCleave, 2009 WL 3518211 , at *3 (quoting Franklin, 210 S.W.3d at 530 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Anderson v. Village of Oswego
green
1 sentence2004See also Wiggins v. Southern Management Corporation, 629 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1993); Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1268 (1985); Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., v. Hedrich, 266 Ill.App.3d 24 , 203 Ill.Dec. 189 , 639 N.E.2d 228 (1994); Anderson v. Village of Oswego, 109 F.Supp.2d 930 (2000); Williams v. The Hillhaven Corporation, 91 N.C.App. 35 , 370 S.E.2d 423 (1988). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. Hedrich
green
2 sentences2004See also Wiggins v. Southern Management Corporation, 629 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1993); Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1268 (1985); Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., v. Hedrich, 266 Ill.App.3d 24 , 203 Ill.Dec. 189 , 639 N.E.2d 228 (1994); Anderson v. Village of Oswego, 109 F.Supp.2d 930 (2000); Williams v. The Hillhaven Corporation, 91 N.C.App. 35 , 370 S.E.2d 423 (1988). 2004See also Wiggins v. Southern Management Corporation, 629 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1993); Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1268 (1985); Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., v. Hedrich, 266 Ill.App.3d 24 , 203 Ill.Dec. 189 , 639 N.E.2d 228 (1994); Anderson v. Village of Oswego, 109 F.Supp.2d 930 (2000); Williams v. The Hillhaven Corporation, 91 N.C.App. 35 , 370 S.E.2d 423 (1988). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Ressler v. Humane Society of Grand Forks
green
1 sentence2004Likewise in Ressler v. Humane Society of Grand Forks, 480 N.W.2d 429 (N.D.1992), the Supreme Court of North Dakota ruled that a public policy exception to the at-will doctrine precludes an employer from discharging an at-will employee for honoring a subpoena and testifying truthfully in a judicial proceeding. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.
green
1 sentence2004See also Wiggins v. Southern Management Corporation, 629 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1993); Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1268 (1985); Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., v. Hedrich, 266 Ill.App.3d 24 , 203 Ill.Dec. 189 , 639 N.E.2d 228 (1994); Anderson v. Village of Oswego, 109 F.Supp.2d 930 (2000); Williams v. The Hillhaven Corporation, 91 N.C.App. 35 , 370 S.E.2d 423 (1988). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Williams v. Hillhaven Corp.
green
2 sentences2004See also Wiggins v. Southern Management Corporation, 629 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1993); Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1268 (1985); Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., v. Hedrich, 266 Ill.App.3d 24 , 203 Ill.Dec. 189 , 639 N.E.2d 228 (1994); Anderson v. Village of Oswego, 109 F.Supp.2d 930 (2000); Williams v. The Hillhaven Corporation, 91 N.C.App. 35 , 370 S.E.2d 423 (1988). 2004See also Wiggins v. Southern Management Corporation, 629 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1993); Kistler v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1268 (1985); Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., v. Hedrich, 266 Ill.App.3d 24 , 203 Ill.Dec. 189 , 639 N.E.2d 228 (1994); Anderson v. Village of Oswego, 109 F.Supp.2d 930 (2000); Williams v. The Hillhaven Corporation, 91 N.C.App. 35 , 370 S.E.2d 423 (1988). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Chism v. Mid-South Milling Co., Inc.
red
1 sentence2002Chism, 762 S.W.2d at 556 ; see also, e.g., Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co., 677 S.W.2d 441, 44445 (Tenn.1984). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Stein v. Davidson Hotel Co.
green
1 sentence2002Further, the Court noted, “to maintain this delicate balance, this Court has emphasized that the exception to the at-will doctrine must be narrowly applied and not be permitted to consume the general rule.” Id. at 717 n.3. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.