predecessor rule (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

predecessor rule in Alabama

7 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Theodore Lawrence Browngreen
ca2 · 1990 · cited in 5 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1991–2003
2 sentences

2003United States v. Brown, 899 F.2d 189, 192 (2d Cir.1990) (comparing 18 U.S.C. § 17 (a) to the predecessor defense recognized in federal courts).

1998United States v. Brown , 899 F.2d 189 , 192 (2d Cir. 1990) (comparing 18 U.S.C. § 17 (a) to the predecessor defense recognized in federal courts).

25

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
McDougal v. State green
alacrimapp · 1990
1 sentence

1992If that form is not used or followed, the court shall return the petition to the petitioner to be amended to comply with the form.” Thus, in McDougal v. State, 563 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), where a petitioner filed a “Motion for Sentence Reduction” and requested the circuit clerk to forward her the necessary forms for filing a Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp. petition (the predecessor rule to Rule 32), the circuit court denied the motion pursuant to Rule 20 without a hearing.

11992–1992
Collins v. Baxter green
ala · 1935
2 sentences

1954As stated in Collins v. Baxter, 231 Ala. 247, 252 , 164 So. 61 , 65: “And as to the theory of interpleader our statute (section 10390, Code 1923) leaves much to the discretion of the trial court concerning the taxation of cost and the allowance of counsel fees out of the fund.” See, also, Johnson v. Malone, 252 Ala. 609, 617 , 42 So.2d 505 ; Jennings v. Jennings, 250 Ala. 130, 133 , 33 So.2d 251 .

1954As stated in Collins v. Baxter, 231 Ala. 247, 252 , 164 So. 61 , 65: “And as to the theory of interpleader our statute (section 10390, Code 1923) leaves much to the discretion of the trial court concerning the taxation of cost and the allowance of counsel fees out of the fund.” See, also, Johnson v. Malone, 252 Ala. 609, 617 , 42 So.2d 505 ; Jennings v. Jennings, 250 Ala. 130, 133 , 33 So.2d 251 .

11954–1954
Jennings v. Jennings green
ala · 1947
2 sentences

1954As stated in Collins v. Baxter, 231 Ala. 247, 252 , 164 So. 61 , 65: “And as to the theory of interpleader our statute (section 10390, Code 1923) leaves much to the discretion of the trial court concerning the taxation of cost and the allowance of counsel fees out of the fund.” See, also, Johnson v. Malone, 252 Ala. 609, 617 , 42 So.2d 505 ; Jennings v. Jennings, 250 Ala. 130, 133 , 33 So.2d 251 .

1954As stated in Collins v. Baxter, 231 Ala. 247, 252 , 164 So. 61 , 65: “And as to the theory of interpleader our statute (section 10390, Code 1923) leaves much to the discretion of the trial court concerning the taxation of cost and the allowance of counsel fees out of the fund.” See, also, Johnson v. Malone, 252 Ala. 609, 617 , 42 So.2d 505 ; Jennings v. Jennings, 250 Ala. 130, 133 , 33 So.2d 251 .

11954–1954
Bryer v. State green
ala · 1949
1 sentence

1954As stated in Collins v. Baxter, 231 Ala. 247, 252 , 164 So. 61 , 65: “And as to the theory of interpleader our statute (section 10390, Code 1923) leaves much to the discretion of the trial court concerning the taxation of cost and the allowance of counsel fees out of the fund.” See, also, Johnson v. Malone, 252 Ala. 609, 617 , 42 So.2d 505 ; Jennings v. Jennings, 250 Ala. 130, 133 , 33 So.2d 251 .

11954–1954
Johnson v. Malone green
ala · 1949
1 sentence

1954As stated in Collins v. Baxter, 231 Ala. 247, 252 , 164 So. 61 , 65: “And as to the theory of interpleader our statute (section 10390, Code 1923) leaves much to the discretion of the trial court concerning the taxation of cost and the allowance of counsel fees out of the fund.” See, also, Johnson v. Malone, 252 Ala. 609, 617 , 42 So.2d 505 ; Jennings v. Jennings, 250 Ala. 130, 133 , 33 So.2d 251 .

11954–1954

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 18u.s.c.17 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 83 (1980–2026) TX 76 (1988–2024) MD 33 (1973–2016) FL 30 (1967–2025) IA 27 (1979–2026) MI 16 (1968–2025) NJ 12 (1974–2022) MO 10 (1980–2021) WA 10 (1979–2011) UT 10 (1989–2025) OR 9 (1988–2026) PA 7 (2019–2026) AL 7 (1954–2003) MS 5 (1994–2003) MA 4 (1985–2010) HI 4 (2003–2026) NY 3 (1948–1995) IN 3 (2000–2010) ID 3 (2023–2024) DC 3 (1977–2003) MN 3 (1977–2015) VA 2 (1997–2012) WY 2 (1986–1986) AZ 2 (1975–1977) NM 2 (1983–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check