White motion (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

White motion in Arkansas

7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
White v. Priestgreen
ark · 2002 · cited in 2 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2004–2007
2 sentences

2007See White I, 348 Ark. at 142, 73 S.W.3d at 575 (discussing White’s motion for recusal, filed by Stilley, and stating “each justice, individually, rejects White’s motion to recuse under the ‘rule of necessity’ ”). b.

2004For example, in White v. Priest, 348 Ark. 135 , 73 S.W.3d 572 (2000), the members of this court rejected White’s motion to recuse, stating the “Rule of Necessity” overrode the rule of disqualification.

12
White v. Priestgreen
ark · 2002 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007See White I, 348 Ark. at 142, 73 S.W.3d at 575 (discussing White’s motion for recusal, filed by Stilley, and stating “each justice, individually, rejects White’s motion to recuse under the ‘rule of necessity’ ”). b.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. green
ark · 1999
2 sentences

2022White, 339 Ark. at 477 , 6 S.W.3d at 100 .

2022White, 339 Ark. at 477 , 6 S.W.3d at 100 .

12022–2022
White v. State green
ark · 2006
2 sentences

2021We concluded that White’s claim that the alleged prior acts support his defense was meritless in light of the fact that the rape of the two victims by White took place from 1999 through 2002, and “these allegedly prior acts were not prior to his rape offenses toward these girls.” Id. at 602 , 242 S.W.3d at 247 . 2 White then filed a timely petition pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 and again challenged the trial court’s exclusion of evidence of the victims’ alleged prior sexual conduct under the rape-shield statute and argued that the exclusion of this evidence deprived him

2021We concluded that White’s claim that the alleged prior acts support his defense was meritless in light of the fact that the rape of the two victims by White took place from 1999 through 2002, and “these allegedly prior acts were not prior to his rape offenses toward these girls.” Id. at 602 , 242 S.W.3d at 247 . 2 White then filed a timely petition pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 and again challenged the trial court’s exclusion of evidence of the victims’ alleged prior sexual conduct under the rape-shield statute and argued that the exclusion of this evidence deprived him

12021–2021
Nabholz Constr. Co. v. White neutral
arkctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2019Similarly, in Nabholz Construction Corp., supra, we affirmed the Commission’s reasoning that a timely filing of a Form AR-C in 1998 tolled the application of the statute, even though there was more than a two-year gap in the payment of benefits, and despite the filing of a Form AR-4 closing the claim, because White’s claim for additional benefits, was neither dismissed nor decided until 2013.

12019–2019
White v. State neutral
ark · 1992
2 sentences

2018This court affirmed White's conviction for aggravated robbery in White v. State , 310 Ark. 200 , 833 S.W.2d 771 (1992).

2018This court affirmed White's conviction for aggravated robbery in White v. State , 310 Ark. 200 , 833 S.W.2d 771 (1992).

12018–2018
Mistretta v. United States green
scotus · 1989
1 sentence

2007With respect to pressure from the executive branch of the State of Arkansas, we must review the two-pronged test adopted by the Supreme Court in Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361 (1989), to determine if there has been a violation.

12007–2007

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TN 45 (2004–2025) OH 38 (1981–2024) WA 35 (1965–2026) GA 33 (1993–2025) CA 33 (1970–2026) TX 32 (1993–2024) MS 27 (1968–2025) PA 26 (1968–2025) IN 22 (1979–2026) FL 18 (1980–2018) IL 17 (1980–2025) VA 11 (1981–2025) IA 10 (2002–2024) MO 9 (1954–2025) WI 9 (1969–2026) MI 8 (1973–2025) AR 7 (2004–2022) NY 7 (1988–2024) AL 7 (1992–2013) KS 7 (1984–2022) MT 6 (1981–2023) MN 6 (1987–2014) KY 6 (2015–2024) AZ 6 (1981–2024) NV 5 (1983–2019) DC 5 (1994–2016) ME 5 (1983–2022) WY 5 (1972–2026) DE 4 (2018–2022) LA 4 (1967–2011) MA 4 (1968–2023) NJ 4 (1964–2024) OR 4 (1996–2011) HI 3 (1999–2024) WV 3 (2011–2012) CT 3 (1994–2018) NC 3 (1986–2005) ID 3 (2011–2019) NE 3 (1991–2022) MD 3 (1967–2006) OK 2 (1995–1996) AK 2 (2007–2013) UT 2 (1994–2020) SC 2 (2003–2019) CO 2 (1967–2025) ND 2 (1982–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check