Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 California opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Campbell v. General Motors Corp.green2 sentences2002However, the "jurors' confusion was not remedied either by the court's [answer] in response to their query or by other instructions." ( Scott, at p. 152, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 643 ; see Krouse, at p. 73, 137 Cal.Rptr. 863 , 562 P.2d 1022 . [9] ) Instead, by misstating the test of causation in its answer to such inquiry, the court raised the bar to an impossibly high level for Sandoval because very little in human affairs is absolutely certain. ( Campbell v. General Motors Corp. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 112, 120 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 891 , 649 P.2d 224 .) [10] More particularly, the court required Sandoval to elimi 2002However, the "jurors' confusion was not remedied either by the court's [answer] in response to their query or by other instructions." ( Scott, at p. 152, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 643 ; see Krouse, at p. 73, 137 Cal.Rptr. 863 , 562 P.2d 1022 . [9] ) Instead, by misstating the test of causation in its answer to such inquiry, the court raised the bar to an impossibly high level for Sandoval because very little in human affairs is absolutely certain. ( Campbell v. General Motors Corp. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 112, 120 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 891 , 649 P.2d 224 .) [10] More particularly, the court required Sandoval to elimi | 2 | 2 |
Hatch v. Penznergreen2 sentences1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of 1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of | 1 | 2 |
Nobles v. Huttongreen2 sentences1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of 1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of | 1 | 2 |
Pleasants v. Hansongreen2 sentences1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of 1969(Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal.App. 14, 20-21 [93 P. 289]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal.App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d. 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal.App. 2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)” (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) ' The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of innocence and instructed on inference of fraud. | 1 | 2 |
Johnson v. Clarkgreen2 sentences1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of 1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of | 1 | 2 |
People v. Clairgreen1 sentence2025(See People v. Clair (1992) 2 Cal.4th 629, 655 [facts that merely afford an opportunity for a difference of opinion do not establish an abuse of discretion].) Finally, while defendant reported he was in a wheelchair due to deterioration of his spine and suffered diabetes and asthma, this was not raised by defense counsel’s request to strike his prior convictions nor was it raised at the hearing. | 1 | 1 |
Krouse v. Grahamgreen2 sentences2002However, the "jurors' confusion was not remedied either by the court's [answer] in response to their query or by other instructions." ( Scott, at p. 152, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 643 ; see Krouse, at p. 73, 137 Cal.Rptr. 863 , 562 P.2d 1022 . [9] ) Instead, by misstating the test of causation in its answer to such inquiry, the court raised the bar to an impossibly high level for Sandoval because very little in human affairs is absolutely certain. ( Campbell v. General Motors Corp. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 112, 120 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 891 , 649 P.2d 224 .) [10] More particularly, the court required Sandoval to elimi 2002However, the "jurors' confusion was not remedied either by the court's [answer] in response to their query or by other instructions." ( Scott, at p. 152, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 643 ; see Krouse, at p. 73, 137 Cal.Rptr. 863 , 562 P.2d 1022 . [9] ) Instead, by misstating the test of causation in its answer to such inquiry, the court raised the bar to an impossibly high level for Sandoval because very little in human affairs is absolutely certain. ( Campbell v. General Motors Corp. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 112, 120 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 891 , 649 P.2d 224 .) [10] More particularly, the court required Sandoval to elimi | 1 | 1 |
Scott v. County of Los Angelesgreen1 sentence2002However, the "jurors' confusion was not remedied either by the court's [answer] in response to their query or by other instructions." ( Scott, at p. 152, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 643 ; see Krouse, at p. 73, 137 Cal.Rptr. 863 , 562 P.2d 1022 . [9] ) Instead, by misstating the test of causation in its answer to such inquiry, the court raised the bar to an impossibly high level for Sandoval because very little in human affairs is absolutely certain. ( Campbell v. General Motors Corp. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 112, 120 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 891 , 649 P.2d 224 .) [10] More particularly, the court required Sandoval to elimi | 1 | 1 |
Solon v. Lichtensteingreen2 sentences1969A presumption of fraud is sufficient to support a finding thereof. [Citation.]" In Solon v. Lichtenstein, 39 Cal.2d 75, 82 [ 244 P.2d 907 ], the court said: "Here a confidential relationship was admitted, and plaintiff presented substantial evidence to show that defendant secured an advantage which was not intended. 1969A presumption of fraud is sufficient to support a finding thereof. [Citation.]" In Solon v. Lichtenstein, 39 Cal.2d 75, 82 [ 244 P.2d 907 ], the court said: "Here a confidential relationship was admitted, and plaintiff presented substantial evidence to show that defendant secured an advantage which was not intended. | 1 | 1 |
Trafton v. Youngbloodgreen2 sentences1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of 1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of | 1 | 1 |
Gudelj v. Gudeljgreen2 sentences1955(See Gudelj v. Gudelj, 41 Cal.2d 202, 212 [ 259 P.2d 656 ]; Perkins v. West, 122 Cal.App.2d 585, 589 [ 265 P.2d 538 ].) Plaintiff contends that defendant’s refusal to work on the houses unless he received an interest in them amounted to “duress.” This contention is too absurd to require answer. 1955(See Gudelj v. Gudelj, 41 Cal.2d 202, 212 [ 259 P.2d 656 ]; Perkins v. West, 122 Cal.App.2d 585, 589 [ 265 P.2d 538 ].) Plaintiff contends that defendant’s refusal to work on the houses unless he received an interest in them amounted to “duress.” This contention is too absurd to require answer. | 1 | 1 |
Perkins v. Westgreen2 sentences1955(See Gudelj v. Gudelj, 41 Cal.2d 202, 212 [ 259 P.2d 656 ]; Perkins v. West, 122 Cal.App.2d 585, 589 [ 265 P.2d 538 ].) Plaintiff contends that defendant’s refusal to work on the houses unless he received an interest in them amounted to “duress.” This contention is too absurd to require answer. 1955(See Gudelj v. Gudelj, 41 Cal.2d 202, 212 [ 259 P.2d 656 ]; Perkins v. West, 122 Cal.App.2d 585, 589 [ 265 P.2d 538 ].) Plaintiff contends that defendant’s refusal to work on the houses unless he received an interest in them amounted to “duress.” This contention is too absurd to require answer. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel Corporation
green
2 sentences1969This raised a presumption of fraud and undue influence, and the burden was cast on defendant to show fairness and good faith in all respects. ( Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal. App. 14, 20-21 [ 93 P. 289 ]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal. App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal. App.2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)" (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal. Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of 1969(Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal.App. 14, 20-21 [93 P. 289]; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal.App. 626, 630-631 [ 192 P. 183 ]; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d. 529, 534 [ 61 P.2d 767 ]; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal.App. 2d 874, 879 [ 113 P.2d 295 ].)” (See also Trafton v. Youngblood, 69 Cal.2d 17, 27, 28 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 568 , 442 P.2d 648 ]; Perlman v. Feldmann, supra, 219 F.2d 173 .) ' The trial court here also instructed on the presumption of innocence and instructed on inference of fraud. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Falk v. Falk
green
2 sentences1955(Falk v. Falk, 48 Cal.App.2d 762 [ 120 P.2d 714 ]; see other cases collected 10 Cal.Jur.2d p. 702, § 35.) Thus, the challenged finding is amply supported, and for that reason cannot be disturbed by this court. 1955(Falk v. Falk, 48 Cal.App.2d 762 [ 120 P.2d 714 ]; see other cases collected 10 Cal.Jur.2d p. 702, § 35.) Thus, the challenged finding is amply supported, and for that reason cannot be disturbed by this court. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Golceff v. Sugarman
green
1 sentence1952(Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal.App. 14, 20-21 ; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal.App. 626, 630-631 ; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 ; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal.App.2d 874, 879 .) Since a presumption of fraud and undue influence is sufficient to sustain a finding thereof (Campbell v. Genshlea, supra, 180 Cal. 213, 224 ), the trial court erred in granting the motion for a nonsuit. (9 Cal.Jur. 559; Golceff v. Sugarman, supra, 36 Cal.2d 152, 153 .) A factual situation somewhat similar to that presented here appears in Estate of Gaines, 15 Cal.2d 255 [ 100 P.2d 1055 ], where th | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Andrews v. California Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1952(Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal.App. 14, 20-21 ; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal.App. 626, 630-631 ; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 ; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal.App.2d 874, 879 .) Since a presumption of fraud and undue influence is sufficient to sustain a finding thereof (Campbell v. Genshlea, supra, 180 Cal. 213, 224 ), the trial court erred in granting the motion for a nonsuit. (9 Cal.Jur. 559; Golceff v. Sugarman, supra, 36 Cal.2d 152, 153 .) A factual situation somewhat similar to that presented here appears in Estate of Gaines, 15 Cal.2d 255 [ 100 P.2d 1055 ], where th 1952(Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal.App. 14, 20-21 ; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal.App. 626, 630-631 ; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 ; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal.App.2d 874, 879 .) Since a presumption of fraud and undue influence is sufficient to sustain a finding thereof (Campbell v. Genshlea, supra, 180 Cal. 213, 224 ), the trial court erred in granting the motion for a nonsuit. (9 Cal.Jur. 559; Golceff v. Sugarman, supra, 36 Cal.2d 152, 153 .) A factual situation somewhat similar to that presented here appears in Estate of Gaines, 15 Cal.2d 255 [ 100 P.2d 1055 ], where th | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Campbell v. Genshlea
green
1 sentence1952(Nobles v. Hutton, supra, 7 Cal.App. 14, 20-21 ; Pleasants v. Hanson, supra, 48 Cal.App. 626, 630-631 ; Johnson v. Clark, supra, 7 Cal.2d 529, 534 ; Hatch v. Penzner, supra, 44 Cal.App.2d 874, 879 .) Since a presumption of fraud and undue influence is sufficient to sustain a finding thereof (Campbell v. Genshlea, supra, 180 Cal. 213, 224 ), the trial court erred in granting the motion for a nonsuit. (9 Cal.Jur. 559; Golceff v. Sugarman, supra, 36 Cal.2d 152, 153 .) A factual situation somewhat similar to that presented here appears in Estate of Gaines, 15 Cal.2d 255 [ 100 P.2d 1055 ], where th | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.