long-recognized rule in Colorado

7 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1977–1992 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

Case	Followed	Cited
Jimerson v. Prendergastgreen coloctapp · 1985 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer's resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court "cannot disturb those findings"); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer "will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer's decision exceeded the bounds of reason"); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) ("C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	2	2
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Spearsgreen colo · 1926 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	2	2
Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggsgreen colo · 1985 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer's resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court "cannot disturb those findings"); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer "will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer's decision exceeded the bounds of reason"); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) ("C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	2	2
Harvey v. Jefferson County School District No. R-1green colo · 1985 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer's resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court "cannot disturb those findings"); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer "will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer's decision exceeded the bounds of reason"); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) ("C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	2	2
Rosenberg v. Bd. of Educ. of Sch. Dist. 1green colo · 1985 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer's resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court "cannot disturb those findings"); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer "will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer's decision exceeded the bounds of reason"); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) ("C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	2	2
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Leitchgreen scotus · 1927 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer's resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court "cannot disturb those findings"); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer "will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer's decision exceeded the bounds of reason"); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) ("C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	1	2
Spears v. State Board of Medical Examinersgreen scotus · 1927 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer's resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court "cannot disturb those findings"); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer "will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer's decision exceeded the bounds of reason"); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) ("C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	1	2
Smith v. Kentuckygreen scotus · 1927 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer's resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court "cannot disturb those findings"); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer "will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer's decision exceeded the bounds of reason"); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) ("C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) 1987Harvey v. Jefferson County School Dist., 710 P.2d 1103, 1109 (Colo.1985) (where a hearing officer’s resolution of factual disputes is supported by the record, this court “cannot disturb those findings”); Rosenberg v. Board of Educ., 710 P.2d 1095, 1098-99 (Colo.1985) (the decision of a hearing officer “will not be reversed as an abuse of discretion unless, given the totality of the factual circumstances at the time of the decision, the hearing officer’s decision exceeded the bounds of reason”); Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs, 696 P.2d 299, 305 (Colo.1985) (“C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)	1	2
Death of Garner v. Vanadium Corp. of Americagreen colo · 1977 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1978–1983 2 sentences 1983See Claimants In re Death of Garner v. Vanadium Corp., 194 Colo. 358 , 572 P.2d 1205 (1977). 1983See Claimants In re Death of Garner v. Vanadium Corp., 194 Colo. 358 , 572 P.2d 1205 (1977).	1	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
James v. IRRIGATION MOTOR AND PUMP COMPANY, INC. green colo · 1972 2 sentences 1977James v. Irrigation Motor & Pump Co., Inc., 180 Colo. 195 , 503 P.2d 1025 (1972). 1977James v. Irrigation Motor & Pump Co., Inc., 180 Colo. 195 , 503 P.2d 1025 (1972).	2	1977–1977
Younger v. City and County of Denver green colo · 1991 1 sentence 1992However, in light of recent statutory changes set out in §§ 8-40-102 and 8-43-201, C.R.S. (1991 Cum.Supp.), together with statements concerning those changes in Younger v. Denver, 810 P.2d 647 (Colo.1991), it is questionable whether this rule remains good law.	1	1992–1992
Mascitelli v. Giuliano & Sons Coal Co. green colo · 1965 2 sentences 1978Mascitelli v. Giuliano & Sons Coal Co., 157 Colo. 240 , 402 P.2d 192 (1965); Claimants in re Death of Garner v. Vanadium Corp. of 979 America, Colo., 572 P.2d 1205 (1977). 1978Mascitelli v. Giuliano & Sons Coal Co., 157 Colo. 240 , 402 P.2d 192 (1965); Claimants in re Death of Garner v. Vanadium Corp. of 979 America, Colo., 572 P.2d 1205 (1977).	1	1978–1978

Where else courts name it

NY 51 (1878–2026) OH 46 (1996–2025) CA 27 (1942–2024) TX 24 (1940–2018) IL 20 (1957–2026) PA 19 (1944–2022) IN 13 (1935–2019) AR 13 (1999–2026) CT 12 (1930–2010) TN 11 (1976–2012) GA 11 (1975–2025) NM 10 (1974–2013) MD 10 (1964–2020) FL 10 (1981–2026) WA 9 (1988–2025) NJ 8 (1942–2020) IA 8 (1944–2025) OK 8 (1959–2023) LA 8 (1983–2013) WY 7 (1987–2020) AL 7 (1929–2010) RI 7 (1987–2023) CO 7 (1977–1992) MA 7 (1994–2024) MI 7 (1933–2013) HI 5 (1992–2014) NC 5 (1897–2012) NE 5 (1961–2021) MO 5 (1955–1999) DC 4 (1982–2008) KS 4 (1979–2021) KY 4 (1980–2025) MS 3 (2002–2018) VA 3 (1971–2026) SC 3 (1999–2019) ME 2 (1971–1986) WV 2 (2003–2007) WI 2 (2006–2020) AZ 2 (2012–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check