Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. R. V.green1 sentence2015Finally, rather than requiring that "having the requisite knowledge," the defendant "did aid, abet or encourage the principal in the commission of the erime," as had been required by prior case law, see Thompson, 655 P.2d at 418 , the new pattern instruction substituted instead the condition that the "defendant did intentionally aid, abet, advise, or encourage the other person in the commission or planning of the crime," COL-JI-Crim. 6:04 (1983) (emphasis added). 3 {13 Although the jury instructions committee entirely omitted the key statutory phrase "with the intent to promote or facilitate t | 1 | 1 |
People v. Lentgreen2 sentences1997See also People v. Lent, 15 Cal.3d 481 , 124 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 541 P.2d 545, 548 (1975) (“A condition of probation will not be held invalid unless it (1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, (2) relates to conduct which is not in itself criminal, and (3) requires or forbids conduct which is not reasonably related to possible future criminality.”); Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla.1993) (setting aside probation condition that offender convicted of carrying concealed firearm refrain from using or possessing alcoholic beverages; condition found unrelated to 1997See also People v. Lent, 15 Cal.3d 481 , 124 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 541 P.2d 545, 548 (1975) (“A condition of probation will not be held invalid unless it (1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, (2) relates to conduct which is not in itself criminal, and (3) requires or forbids conduct which is not reasonably related to possible future criminality.”); Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla.1993) (setting aside probation condition that offender convicted of carrying concealed firearm refrain from using or possessing alcoholic beverages; condition found unrelated to | 1 | 1 |
Biller v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See also People v. Lent, 15 Cal.3d 481 , 124 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 541 P.2d 545, 548 (1975) (“A condition of probation will not be held invalid unless it (1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, (2) relates to conduct which is not in itself criminal, and (3) requires or forbids conduct which is not reasonably related to possible future criminality.”); Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla.1993) (setting aside probation condition that offender convicted of carrying concealed firearm refrain from using or possessing alcoholic beverages; condition found unrelated to | 1 | 1 |
Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.green1 sentence1990We reject this argument. “[I]t is a widely accepted rule of agency law that a real estate broker operating under an exclusive listing contract with the seller of the property stands in an agency relationship to the seller.” Stor-troen v. Beneficial Finance Co., 736 P.2d 391, 396 (Colo.1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2015Finally, rather than requiring that “having the requisite knowledge,” the defendant “did aid, abet or encourage the principal in the commission of the crime,” as had been required by prior case law, see Thompson, 655 P.2d at 418 , the new pattern instruction substituted instead the condition that the “defendant did intentionally aid, abet, advise, or encourage the other person in the commission or planning of the crime,” COLJI-Crim. 6:04 (1983) (emphasis added). 3 ¶13 Although the jury instructions committee entirely omitted the key statutory phrase “with the intent to promote or facilitate th 2015Finally, rather than requiring that "having the requisite knowledge," the defendant "did aid, abet or encourage the principal in the commission of the erime," as had been required by prior case law, see Thompson, 655 P.2d at 418 , the new pattern instruction substituted instead the condition that the "defendant did intentionally aid, abet, advise, or encourage the other person in the commission or planning of the crime," COL-JI-Crim. 6:04 (1983) (emphasis added). 3 {13 Although the jury instructions committee entirely omitted the key statutory phrase "with the intent to promote or facilitate t | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Daubert, 509 U.S. at 585 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 (noting that, "In the 70 years since its formulation in the Frye case, the 'general acceptance' test has been the dominant standard for determining the admissibility of novel scientific evidence at trial."). 2001Daubert, 509 U.S. at 585 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 (noting that, "In the 70 years since its formulation in the Frye case, the 'general acceptance' test has been the dominant standard for determining the admissibility of novel scientific evidence at trial."). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher
green
2 sentences1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). 1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton
green
2 sentences1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). 1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.
green
2 sentences1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). 1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Myer v. Miller
green
2 sentences1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). 1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo.1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Vogt v. Town & Country Realty of Lincoln, Inc.
green
2 sentences1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). 1987E.g., Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Schumacher, 229 Kan. 252 , 624 P.2d 420 (1981); Vogt v. Town & Country Realty, 194 Neb. 308 , 231 N.W.2d 496 (1975); Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 82 Nev. 6 , 409 P.2d 627 (1966); Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau, 73 Wash. 2d 225 , 437 P.2d 897 (1968); Myer v. Miller, 631 P.2d 441 (Wyo. 1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Aetna Finance Co. v. Antoine
green
2 sentences1986For example, in Aetna Finance Co. v. Antoine, 343 So.2d 1195 (La.App.1977), Louisiana held that a grant of a chattel mortgage in statutorily exempt household personal property creates an implied waiver of the statutory exemptions. 1986For example, in Aetna Finance Co. v. Antoine, 343 So.2d 1195 (La.App. 1977), Louisiana held that a grant of a chattel mortgage in statutorily exempt household personal property creates an implied waiver of the statutory exemptions. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.