presentment hearing in Connecticut

7 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Giffordgreen connappct · 2003 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004Compare Statewide Grievance Committee v. Gifford, 76 Conn. App. 454 , 820 A.2d 309 (2003), in which an attorney failed to appear at a presentment hearing in Superior Court. 2004Compare Statewide Grievance Committee v. Gifford, 76 Conn. App. 454 , 820 A.2d 309 (2003), in which an attorney failed to appear at a presentment hearing in Superior Court.	1	1
Krondes v. Norwalk Savings Societygreen connappct · 1999 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999Copies CT Page 7964 of those pleadings were introduced at the presentment hearing by the Committee, with no objection. 5 It is clear to this court, based on the testimony at the hearings, the documents submitted into evidence, the conclusive effect of the decision in the New Britain collection case discussed above; see Krondes v. Norwalk Saving Society , 53 Conn. App. 102 , 119 A.2d ___ (1999); that the Committee has met its burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (17)

Case	Cited	Years
Cox v. Miller, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility green scotus · 2003 2 sentences 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L. 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L.	2	2020–2020
Carmona v. O'neill, Secretary of the Treasury green scotus · 2003 2 sentences 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L. 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L.	2	2020–2020
Robles Morejon v. Goethals, Director of Community Supervision and Corrections, Department of Dallas County, Texas neutral scotus · 2003 2 sentences 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L. 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L.	2	2020–2020
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Timbers green conn · 2002 2 sentences 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L. 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L.	2	2020–2020
Fromer v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection green conn · 2002 2 sentences 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L. 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L.	2	2020–2020
Kitchens v. Comm'r of Corr. green conn · 2016 2 sentences 2020The respondent had contended that the original December 9, 2014 order only prohibited her from appearing before the Appellate Court. 9 The court takes judicial notice of the matter of Jordan M. v. Darric M., Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. FA-XX-XXXXXXX- S, as well as the Appellate Court case, Jordan M. v. Darric M., 168 Conn. App. 314 , 146 A.3d 1041 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 902 , 151 A.3d 1287 (2016). 10 Practice Book § 2-44A provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) General Definition: The practice of law is ministering to the legal needs of another person and applying le 2020The respondent had contended that the original December 9, 2014 order only prohibited her from appearing before the Appellate Court. 9 The court takes judicial notice of the matter of Jordan M. v. Darric M., Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. FA-XX-XXXXXXX- S, as well as the Appellate Court case, Jordan M. v. Darric M., 168 Conn. App. 314 , 146 A.3d 1041 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 902 , 151 A.3d 1287 (2016). 10 Practice Book § 2-44A provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) General Definition: The practice of law is ministering to the legal needs of another person and applying le	2	2020–2020
Jordan M. v. Darric M. green conn · 2016 2 sentences 2020The respondent had contended that the original December 9, 2014 order only prohibited her from appearing before the Appellate Court. 9 The court takes judicial notice of the matter of Jordan M. v. Darric M., Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. FA-XX-XXXXXXX- S, as well as the Appellate Court case, Jordan M. v. Darric M., 168 Conn. App. 314 , 146 A.3d 1041 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 902 , 151 A.3d 1287 (2016). 10 Practice Book § 2-44A provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) General Definition: The practice of law is ministering to the legal needs of another person and applying le 2020The respondent had contended that the original December 9, 2014 order only prohibited her from appearing before the Appellate Court. 9 The court takes judicial notice of the matter of Jordan M. v. Darric M., Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. FA-XX-XXXXXXX- S, as well as the Appellate Court case, Jordan M. v. Darric M., 168 Conn. App. 314 , 146 A.3d 1041 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 902 , 151 A.3d 1287 (2016). 10 Practice Book § 2-44A provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) General Definition: The practice of law is ministering to the legal needs of another person and applying le	2	2020–2020
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Timbers neutral connappct · 2002 2 sentences 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L. 2020Statewide Grievance Commit- tee v. Timbers, 70 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 796 A.2d 565 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 908 , 804 A.2d 214 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 , 123 S. Ct. 1274 , 154 L.	2	2020–2020
Jordan M. v. Darric M. green connappct · 2016 2 sentences 2020The respondent had contended that the original December 9, 2014 order only prohibited her from appearing before the Appellate Court. 9 The court takes judicial notice of the matter of Jordan M. v. Darric M., Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. FA-XX-XXXXXXX- S, as well as the Appellate Court case, Jordan M. v. Darric M., 168 Conn. App. 314 , 146 A.3d 1041 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 902 , 151 A.3d 1287 (2016). 10 Practice Book § 2-44A provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) General Definition: The practice of law is ministering to the legal needs of another person and applying le 2020The respondent had contended that the original December 9, 2014 order only prohibited her from appearing before the Appellate Court. 9 The court takes judicial notice of the matter of Jordan M. v. Darric M., Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. FA-XX-XXXXXXX- S, as well as the Appellate Court case, Jordan M. v. Darric M., 168 Conn. App. 314 , 146 A.3d 1041 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 902 , 151 A.3d 1287 (2016). 10 Practice Book § 2-44A provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) General Definition: The practice of law is ministering to the legal needs of another person and applying le	2	2020–2020
AFSCME, Council 15, Local 1159 v. City of Bridgeport neutral conn · 1990 1 sentence 2008The claim alleged that the plaintiff had been authorized to file the otherwise untimely claim pursuant to S.A. 94-13, § 1, which had been approved by the legislature on June 7, 1994, and which provided: “(a) Notwithstanding the failure to file a proper notice of a claim against the state with the clerk of the office of the claims commissioner, as required by section 4- *705 147 of the general statutes, within the time limitations specified by subsection (a) of section 4-148 of the general statutes, and notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (c) of said section 4-148 barring the presentme	1	2008–2008
Kinney v. State green conn · 1989 1 sentence 2008The claim alleged that the plaintiff had been authorized to file the otherwise untimely claim pursuant to S.A. 94-13, § 1, which had been approved by the legislature on June 7, 1994, and which provided: “(a) Notwithstanding the failure to file a proper notice of a claim against the state with the clerk of the office of the claims commissioner, as required by section 4- *705 147 of the general statutes, within the time limitations specified by subsection (a) of section 4-148 of the general statutes, and notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (c) of said section 4-148 barring the presentme	1	2008–2008
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Spirer green connappct · 1997 2 sentences 1999“The committee claim[ed] on appeal [to the Appellate Court] that the trial court abused its discretion when it (1) suspended the defendant from the practice of law for only six months, and (2) did not discipline the defendant further because of his admission at the presentment hearing that he had made certain misrepresentations in federal court.” Statewide Grievance Committee v. Spirer, 46 Conn. App. 450, 451-54 , 699 A.2d 1047 (1997). 1999“The committee claim[ed] on appeal [to the Appellate Court] that the trial court abused its discretion when it (1) suspended the defendant from the practice of law for only six months, and (2) did not discipline the defendant further because of his admission at the presentment hearing that he had made certain misrepresentations in federal court.” Statewide Grievance Committee v. Spirer, 46 Conn. App. 450, 451-54 , 699 A.2d 1047 (1997).	1	1999–1999
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rozbicki green conn · 1991 1 sentence 1995Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rozbicki, 219 Conn. 473 (1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1170 , 117 L.Ed.2d 416 (1992) (Practice Book provision stating that a hearing on the merits of a presentment claim "shall be held within sixty days of the date the complaint was filed with the court" held directory; Caron v. Inland Wetlands Watercourses Commission, 222 Conn. 269 (1992) (statute which read that action "shall be taken" by a local wetlands agency on applications within 35 days after completion of public hearing or in the absence of a hearing within 65 days from the date of recei	1	1995–1995
Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission green conn · 1992 1 sentence 1995Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rozbicki, 219 Conn. 473 (1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1170 , 117 L.Ed.2d 416 (1992) (Practice Book provision stating that a hearing on the merits of a presentment claim "shall be held within sixty days of the date the complaint was filed with the court" held directory; Caron v. Inland Wetlands Watercourses Commission, 222 Conn. 269 (1992) (statute which read that action "shall be taken" by a local wetlands agency on applications within 35 days after completion of public hearing or in the absence of a hearing within 65 days from the date of recei	1	1995–1995
Donohue v. Zoning Board of Appeals green conn · 1967 1 sentence 1995Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rozbicki, 219 Conn. 473 (1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1170 , 117 L.Ed.2d 416 (1992) (Practice Book provision stating that a hearing on the merits of a presentment claim "shall be held within sixty days of the date the complaint was filed with the court" held directory; Caron v. Inland Wetlands Watercourses Commission, 222 Conn. 269 (1992) (statute which read that action "shall be taken" by a local wetlands agency on applications within 35 days after completion of public hearing or in the absence of a hearing within 65 days from the date of recei	1	1995–1995
Coday v. City of Springfield green scotus · 1992 1 sentence 1995Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rozbicki, 219 Conn. 473 (1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1170 , 117 L.Ed.2d 416 (1992) (Practice Book provision stating that a hearing on the merits of a presentment claim "shall be held within sixty days of the date the complaint was filed with the court" held directory; Caron v. Inland Wetlands Watercourses Commission, 222 Conn. 269 (1992) (statute which read that action "shall be taken" by a local wetlands agency on applications within 35 days after completion of public hearing or in the absence of a hearing within 65 days from the date of recei	1	1995–1995
Finley v. Hoechst Celanese Corp. green scotus · 1992 1 sentence 1995Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rozbicki, 219 Conn. 473 (1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1170 , 117 L.Ed.2d 416 (1992) (Practice Book provision stating that a hearing on the merits of a presentment claim "shall be held within sixty days of the date the complaint was filed with the court" held directory; Caron v. Inland Wetlands Watercourses Commission, 222 Conn. 269 (1992) (statute which read that action "shall be taken" by a local wetlands agency on applications within 35 days after completion of public hearing or in the absence of a hearing within 65 days from the date of recei	1	1995–1995

Where else courts name it

TX 195 (1940–2026) MA 66 (1982–2025) NM 19 (1980–2026) IL 13 (1998–2026) GA 11 (2016–2024) AL 9 (1843–2015) CT 7 (1995–2020) IA 6 (2016–2026) OH 6 (1871–2015) RI 6 (1979–2009) CA 5 (1865–2020) MD 5 (1978–2006) MI 5 (1999–2025) WA 5 (2001–2016) WY 4 (1978–2010) NJ 3 (1981–2018) KS 3 (1984–2020) NY 3 (1890–2011) PA 3 (2020–2020) NE 2 (1963–1990) OR 2 (1893–1919) MO 2 (1911–1937)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check