7 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1971–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Shell Oil Co.green1 sentence2019Underground Storage Tank Fund Bd. v. Shell Oil Co., 606 N.W.2d 376, 380 (Iowa 2000) (“Under the doctrine of ejusdem generis, general words which follow specific words are tied to the meaning and purpose of the specific words.”). 19 A trial court in Florida recently struggled with the question of whether the demolition of a pier building provided the basis for a referendum under a city charter provision that required voter approval when waterfront property owned by the city was “sold, donated, or leased.” See Ford v. City of St. | 1 | 1 |
Teamsters Local Union No. 421 v. City of Dubuquegreen2 sentences2013The doctrine of ejusdem generis “provides that when general words follow specific words in a statute, the general words are read to embrace only objects similar to those objects of the specific words.” Teamsters Local Union No. 421 v. City of Dubuque, 706 N.W.2d 709, 715 (Iowa 2005). 2013The doctrine of ejusdem generis “provides that when general words follow specific words in a statute, the general words are read to embrace only objects similar to those objects of the specific words.” Teamsters Local Union No. 421 v. City of Dubuque, 706 N.W.2d 709, 715 (Iowa 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Keenan v. Bowersgreen1 sentence2000Furthermore, the word “other” is used to modify “potentially responsible party.” In following “owner, operator,” it indicates a “potentially responsible party” includes an “owner” or “operator.” See Keenan v. Bowers, 91 F.Supp. 771, 773 (E.D.S.C. 1950) (the word “other” following an enumeration of particular classes of things in a statute is read as meaning “other such like” and as including only words of like kind or character). | 1 | 1 |
Johnston v. Marion Independent School Districtgreen1 sentence1979In Hartman v. Merged Area VI Community College, 270 N.W.2d 822, 826-28 (Iowa 1978), we applied the ejusdem generis rule to link the phrase “any good cause” with preceding statutory language, “incompetency, inattention to duty, [or] partiality.” In Johnston v. Marion Independent School District, 275 N.W.2d 215, 216 (Iowa 1979), we held a teacher’s attainment of mandatory retirement age was not a ground for “good cause” discharge. | 1 | 1 |
Hartman v. Merged Area VI Community Collegegreen1 sentence1979In Hartman v. Merged Area VI Community College, 270 N.W.2d 822, 826-28 (Iowa 1978), we applied the ejusdem generis rule to link the phrase “any good cause” with preceding statutory language, “incompetency, inattention to duty, [or] partiality.” In Johnston v. Marion Independent School District, 275 N.W.2d 215, 216 (Iowa 1979), we held a teacher’s attainment of mandatory retirement age was not a ground for “good cause” discharge. | 1 | 1 |
National Bank of Commerce v. Ripleygreen2 sentences1973The ejusdem generis rule instead gives effect to both the particular and the general words “ ‘by treating the particular words as indicting the class, and the general words as extending the provisions of the statute to everything embraced in that class, though not specifically named by the particular words.’ ” 2 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 4909 at 399 (Third Ed. 1943), quoting National Bank of Commerce v. Estate of Ripley, 161 Mo. 126, 131 , 61 S.W. 587, 588 (1901). 1973The ejusdem generis rule instead gives effect to both the particular and the general words “ ‘by treating the particular words as indicting the class, and the general words as extending the provisions of the statute to everything embraced in that class, though not specifically named by the particular words.’ ” 2 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 4909 at 399 (Third Ed. 1943), quoting National Bank of Commerce v. Estate of Ripley, 161 Mo. 126, 131 , 61 S.W. 587, 588 (1901). | 1 | 1 |
Hodgson v. Mountain & Gulf Oil Co.green1 sentence1973Hodgson v. Mountain & Gulf Oil Co., 297 F. 269, 272 (D.C.Wyo.1924) ("The ejusdem generis rule of statutory construction is that a `clean-up' phrase of this character will include only things of a like or similar kind * * *."); 50 Am.Jur. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cusick
green
2 sentences1979State v. Cusick, 248 Iowa 1168 , 84 N.W.2d 554 (1957). 1979State v. Cusick, 248 Iowa 1168 , 84 N.W.2d 554 (1957). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Cowgill
green
1 sentence1971Hoffman v. United States, supra; People v. Cowgill, supra; People v. Radich, supra. The defendant cites State v. Saionz (1969), 23 Ohio App.2d 79 , 261 N.E.2d 135 , where a conviction for "having otherwise cast contempt" upon the flag by wearing it as a cape was overturned under the ejusdem generis rule of statutory interpretation. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
State v. Saionz
green
2 sentences1971Hoffman v. United States, supra; People v. Cowgill, supra; People v. Radich, supra. The defendant cites State v. Saionz (1969), 23 Ohio App.2d 79 , 261 N.E.2d 135 , where a conviction for "having otherwise cast contempt" upon the flag by wearing it as a cape was overturned under the ejusdem generis rule of statutory interpretation. 1971Hoffman v. United States, supra; People v. Cowgill, supra; People v. Radich, supra. The defendant cites State v. Saionz (1969), 23 Ohio App.2d 79 , 261 N.E.2d 135 , where a conviction for "having otherwise cast contempt" upon the flag by wearing it as a cape was overturned under the ejusdem generis rule of statutory interpretation. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.