6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hartgreen2 sentences2018State v. Hart , 135 Idaho 827 , 831, 25 P.3d 850 , 854 (2001). 2018State v. Hart , 135 Idaho 827 , 831, 25 P.3d 850 , 854 (2001). | 2 | 3 |
Case v. First Natl. Bank of City of Brooklyngreen2 sentences1986See Case v. First National Bank of City of Brooklyn, 59 Misc. 269 , 109 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1908). 1986See Case v. First National Bank of City of Brooklyn, 59 Misc. 269 , 109 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1908). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Winton Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences2001One of the maxims of statutory construction is the rule which holds that “where general words of a statute follow an enumeration of persons or things, such general words will be construed as meaning persons or things of like or similar class or character to those specifically enumerated, usually designated the ejusdem generis rule.” Pepple v. Headrick, 64 Idaho 132 , 128 P.2d 575 [757] (1942); In Re Winton Dumber Co., 57 Idaho 131 , 63 P.2d 664 (1936). 2001One of the maxims of statutory construction is the rule which holds that “where general words of a statute follow an enumeration of persons or things, such general words will be construed as meaning persons or things of like or similar class or character to those specifically enumerated, usually designated the ejusdem generis rule.” Pepple v. Headrick, 64 Idaho 132 , 128 P.2d 575 [757] (1942); In Re Winton Dumber Co., 57 Idaho 131 , 63 P.2d 664 (1936). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Pepple v. Headrick
green
1 sentence2001One of the maxims of statutory construction is the rule which holds that “where general words of a statute follow an enumeration of persons or things, such general words will be construed as meaning persons or things of like or similar class or character to those specifically enumerated, usually designated the ejusdem generis rule.” Pepple v. Headrick, 64 Idaho 132 , 128 P.2d 575 [757] (1942); In Re Winton Dumber Co., 57 Idaho 131 , 63 P.2d 664 (1936). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Osborne v. Holford
green
2 sentences1985Under the holding of Osborne v. Holford, 40 Colo. App. 365 , 575 P.2d 866 (1978), a conveyance of only the surface rights without an express specific reservation results in an implied reservation by the grantor of the mineral rights. 1985Under the holding of Osborne v. Holford, 40 Colo. App. 365 , 575 P.2d 866 (1978), a conveyance of only the surface rights without an express specific reservation results in an implied reservation by the grantor of the mineral rights. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.