grandfather clause in Indiana

2013The Supreme Court of Maine held that Lot 7 did not qualify as a lot of record because it did not exist as a separate lot in 1972: In Camplin v. Town of York, 471 A.2d 1035 (Me. 1984), we interpreted a grandfather clause that exempted “lots of record” from complying with an amendment to the zoning ordinance.

2013The Supreme Court of Maine held that Lot 7 did not qualify as a lot of record because it did not exist as a separate lot in 1972: In Camplin v. Town of York, 471 A.2d 1035 (Me.1984), we interpreted a grandfather clause that exempted “lots of record” from complying with an amendment to the zoning ordinance.

2008See, e.g., Weems v. Little Rock Police Dep’t., 453 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir.2006) (one plaintiff was a renter and another plaintiff lived with his mother, so neither had a property interest in the residence they lived in); Graham v. *75 Henry, 2006 WL 2645130 (N.D.Okla.2006) (plaintiff married after effective date of statute and moved into house owned by new wife; the statute also provided exemptions for residences established before the effective date of the statute “grandfather clause”); Doe v. Miller, 405 F.3d 700 (8th Cir.2005) (the Iowa statute had a grandfather clause and a “move to the offend

2008See, e.g., Weems v. Little Rock Police Dep’t., 453 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir.2006) (one plaintiff was a renter and another plaintiff lived with his mother, so neither had a property interest in the residence they lived in); Graham v. *75 Henry, 2006 WL 2645130 (N.D.Okla.2006) (plaintiff married after effective date of statute and moved into house owned by new wife; the statute also provided exemptions for residences established before the effective date of the statute “grandfather clause”); Doe v. Miller, 405 F.3d 700 (8th Cir.2005) (the Iowa statute had a grandfather clause and a “move to the offend

2008See, e.g., Weems v. Little Rock Police Dep’t., 453 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir.2006) (one plaintiff was a renter and another plaintiff lived with his mother, so neither had a property interest in the residence they lived in); Graham v. *75 Henry, 2006 WL 2645130 (N.D.Okla.2006) (plaintiff married after effective date of statute and moved into house owned by new wife; the statute also provided exemptions for residences established before the effective date of the statute “grandfather clause”); Doe v. Miller, 405 F.3d 700 (8th Cir.2005) (the Iowa statute had a grandfather clause and a “move to the offend

2008See, e.g., Weems v. Little Rock Police Dep’t., 453 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir.2006) (one plaintiff was a renter and another plaintiff lived with his mother, so neither had a property interest in the residence they lived in); Graham v. *75 Henry, 2006 WL 2645130 (N.D.Okla.2006) (plaintiff married after effective date of statute and moved into house owned by new wife; the statute also provided exemptions for residences established before the effective date of the statute “grandfather clause”); Doe v. Miller, 405 F.3d 700 (8th Cir.2005) (the Iowa statute had a grandfather clause and a “move to the offend

2004City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297, 304 , 96 S.Ct. 2513 , 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976) (failed equal protection challenge to a grandfather clause that exempted certain businesses from new regulations).

2004City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297, 304 , 96 S.Ct. 2513 , 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976) (failed equal protection challenge to a grandfather clause that exempted certain businesses from new regulations).

1989However, the Supreme Court of Indiana has held on a prior occasion that the imposition of a teacher evaluation plan constituted a "working condition." Evansville, Vanderburgh School Corp. v. Roberts (1980), 273 Ind. 449, 453 , 405 N.E.2d 895, 898-99 .

1989However, the Supreme Court of Indiana has held on a prior occasion that the imposition of a teacher evaluation plan constituted a "working condition." Evansville, Vanderburgh School Corp. v. Roberts (1980), 273 Ind. 449, 453 , 405 N.E.2d 895, 898-99 .

1989Bd. (1988), Ind.App., 529 N.E.2d 847 , resolved the conflict between the grandfather clause and a school board’s managerial power by ruling that calendar items which were bargained as part of a 1972-1973 agreement and which do not infringe upon a school board’s exclusive managerial power remain bargainable under the grandfather clause in IND.