Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Louisiana opinions name it 3 courts 1914–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Oglesby v. Town of Winnfieldgreen2 sentences1970In Oglesby, supra, the court stated: "* * * The safe rule is to have the alleged nuisance judicially declared to be a nuisance and its abatement procured through processes of government orderly exercised. 1970It is only in cases of emergency that abatement of a nuisance may be accomplished without prior adjudication of a court authorizing such to be done, and even in such cases, the abatement is done at the actor's risk and peril." 27 So.2d at p. 142 (Emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Bell v. Bruengreen1 sentence1934See, also, Bell v. Bruen, 1 How. 187 , 11 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Continental Supply Co. v. Tuckerrose Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1937In the case of Continental Supply Co. v. Tucker-Rose Oil Co., 146 La. 671 , 83 So. 892, 893 , this court affirmed the doctrine laid down in the case of Menard v. Scudder, 7 La.Ann. 385 , 56 Am.Dec. 610, as follows: “A safe rule of construction of a guaranty is to give the instrument that effect which shall best accord with the intentions of the parties, as manifested by the terms of the guaranty, taken in connection with the subject-matter to which it relates, neither enlarging the words beyond their import in favor of the creditor, nor restricting them in the aid of the surety.” There could b 1937In the case of Continental Supply Co. v. Tucker-Rose Oil Co., 146 La. 671 , 83 So. 892, 893 , this court affirmed the doctrine laid down in the case of Menard v. Scudder, 7 La.Ann. 385 , 56 Am.Dec. 610, as follows: “A safe rule of construction of a guaranty is to give the instrument that effect which shall best accord with the intentions of the parties, as manifested by the terms of the guaranty, taken in connection with the subject-matter to which it relates, neither enlarging the words beyond their import in favor of the creditor, nor restricting them in the aid of the surety.” There could b | 2 | 1937–1973 |
Menard v. Scudder
green
2 sentences1937In the case of Continental Supply Co. v. Tucker-Rose Oil Co., 146 La. 671 , 83 So. 892, 893 , this court affirmed the doctrine laid down in the case of Menard v. Scudder, 7 La.Ann. 385 , 56 Am.Dec. 610, as follows: “A safe rule of construction of a guaranty is to give the instrument that effect which shall best accord with the intentions of the parties, as manifested by the terms of the guaranty, taken in connection with the subject-matter to which it relates, neither enlarging the words beyond their import in favor of the creditor, nor restricting them in the aid of the surety.” There could b 1920“A safe rule of construction of a guaranty is to give the instrument that effect which shall best accord with the intentions of the parties, as manifested by the terms of the guaranty, taken in connection with the subject-matter to which it relates, neither enlarging the words beyond their import in favor of the creditor, nor restricting them in the aid of the surety.” Menard v. Scudder, 7 La. | 2 | 1920–1937 |
Barry v. Walker
neutral
1 sentence1995State v. Brunson, 111 So. 321 (La. 1927) . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Central Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Hamilton
neutral
1 sentence1973Continental Supply Co. v. Tucher-Rose [Tucker-Rose] Oil Co., 83 So. 892 , 146 La. 671 (1920); Central Savings Bank and Trust Company v. Hamilton, 161 So. 658 (La.App. 2nd cir. 1935). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Succession of Weigel
neutral
1 sentence1914I think the tenor of our decisions and practice goes to require that extent of evidence, and I believe it would be a safe rule to do so.”' In Huddleston v. Coyle, 21 La. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.