Commissioner hearing (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

Commissioner hearing in Maryland

7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Muhl v. Magangreen
md · 1988 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1989–2011
2 sentences

2011See § 2-210(a)(2) ("The Commissioner shall hold a hearing ... on written demand by a person *733 aggrieved by any act of, threatened act of, or failure to act by the Commissioner...."); Muhl v. Magan, 313 Md. 462, 467 , 545 A.2d 1321, 1323-24 (1988). [11] In any event, if the insurer requested the hearing, the aggrieved consumer is not required to, but is allowed to intervene and, thereafter, become a party.

2011See § 2-210(a)(2) ("The Commissioner shall hold a hearing ... on written demand by a person *733 aggrieved by any act of, threatened act of, or failure to act by the Commissioner...."); Muhl v. Magan, 313 Md. 462, 467 , 545 A.2d 1321, 1323-24 (1988). [11] In any event, if the insurer requested the hearing, the aggrieved consumer is not required to, but is allowed to intervene and, thereafter, become a party.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
County of Riverside v. McLaughlin green
scotus · 1991
2 sentences

2013The Commissioner hearing, combining a probable cause hearing with an initial bail determination, is designed to “minimize the time a presumptively innocent individual spends in jail.” See id. at 58 , 111 S.Ct. 1661 .

2013The Commissioner hearing, combining a probable cause hearing with an initial bail determination, is designed to “minimize the time a presumptively innocent individual spends in jail.” See id. at 58 , 111 S.Ct. 1661 .

12013–2013
DeWolfe v. Richmond green
md · 2012
2 sentences

2013The majority cites, at length, the language in Richmond I, 434 Md. at 427-31 , 76 A.3d at 976-78 , in which this Court wrote about the potential for defendants to lose their liberty in a Commissioner hearing and the potential benefit of counsel for defendants in that process.

2013The majority cites, at length, the language in Richmond I, 434 Md. at 427-31 , 76 A.3d at 976-78 , in which this Court wrote about the potential for defendants to lose their liberty in a Commissioner hearing and the potential benefit of counsel for defendants in that process.

12013–2013
Wood v. Fletcher Allen Health Care green
vt · 1999
1 sentence

2004Id. (emphasis supplied).

12004–2004
Odum v. State green
mdctspecapp · 2004
2 sentences

2004At *586 1:56 p.m., Odum "was taken to a holding cell near the Commissioner's hearing room...." Id.

2004At 1:56 p.m., Odum “was taken to a holding cell near the Commissioner’s hearing room.... ” Id.

12004–2004
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. green
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

2001Howey, 328 U.S. at 299-300 , 66 S.Ct. 1100 . *330 In the case at bar, the Commissioner’s analysis of the nature of the interests in the LLCs touched upon the form of the entity, the power delegated to the members by the membership and management agreements, and, most importantly, the economic realities of the members’ interest in the LLCs.

2001Howey, 328 U.S. at 299-300 , 66 S.Ct. 1100 . *330 In the case at bar, the Commissioner’s analysis of the nature of the interests in the LLCs touched upon the form of the entity, the power delegated to the members by the membership and management agreements, and, most importantly, the economic realities of the members’ interest in the LLCs.

12001–2001
Coerper v. Comptroller of the Treasury green
md · 1972
2 sentences

1975Coerper v. Comptroller, 265 Md. 3, 6 , 288 A.2d 187 (1972); Unsatisfied Fund v. Bowman, 249 Md. 705, 709 , 241 A.2d 714 (1968). [4] Section 242B (1) states: "Any insurer or rating organization aggrieved by any order or decision of the Commissioner under this subtitle made without a hearing, may within thirty (30) days after notice of the order to the insurer or organization, make written request to the Commissioner for a hearing thereon.

1975Coerper v. Comptroller, 265 Md. 3, 6 , 288 A.2d 187 (1972); Unsatisfied Fund v. Bowman, 249 Md. 705, 709 , 241 A.2d 714 (1968). [4] Section 242B (1) states: "Any insurer or rating organization aggrieved by any order or decision of the Commissioner under this subtitle made without a hearing, may within thirty (30) days after notice of the order to the insurer or organization, make written request to the Commissioner for a hearing thereon.

11975–1975
Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. Bowman green
md · 1968
2 sentences

1975Coerper v. Comptroller, 265 Md. 3, 6 , 288 A.2d 187 (1972); Unsatisfied Fund v. Bowman, 249 Md. 705, 709 , 241 A.2d 714 (1968). [4] Section 242B (1) states: "Any insurer or rating organization aggrieved by any order or decision of the Commissioner under this subtitle made without a hearing, may within thirty (30) days after notice of the order to the insurer or organization, make written request to the Commissioner for a hearing thereon.

1975Coerper v. Comptroller, 265 Md. 3, 6 , 288 A.2d 187 (1972); Unsatisfied Fund v. Bowman, 249 Md. 705, 709 , 241 A.2d 714 (1968). [4] Section 242B (1) states: "Any insurer or rating organization aggrieved by any order or decision of the Commissioner under this subtitle made without a hearing, may within thirty (30) days after notice of the order to the insurer or organization, make written request to the Commissioner for a hearing thereon.

11975–1975

Where else courts name it

TX 40 (1935–2025) NY 34 (1895–2026) CA 28 (1936–2025) CT 25 (1919–2018) NJ 23 (1968–2025) VA 17 (1851–2022) IL 13 (1920–2010) MA 13 (1919–2016) MN 11 (1976–2025) WV 9 (1933–2015) ME 9 (1945–2017) VT 8 (1989–2017) MD 7 (1975–2013) TN 7 (1963–2013) IA 6 (1957–2024) IN 6 (1996–2026) LA 6 (1945–1994) GA 6 (1979–2024) OR 5 (1968–1983) WA 5 (2003–2025) PA 5 (1980–1993) NC 4 (1980–2020) NM 4 (1972–2012) MT 4 (1972–2026) KY 4 (1920–2013) DE 3 (1984–2025) UT 3 (2006–2017) MI 3 (1875–2013) WI 3 (1938–1977) FL 3 (1976–2010) AR 3 (1992–2008) AZ 2 (2010–2010) CO 2 (1960–2001) OH 2 (2011–2013) OK 2 (1980–2010) AL 2 (1987–2002)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check