Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
First American Title Insurance Co. v. Robertson
green
2 sentences2026First American, however, insisted “that the documents presented to the trial court were sufficient to decide whether the Commissioner’s hearing order was void.” First American Title, 19 N.E.3d at 762 . 2016In a footnote, the supreme court also summarily affirmed “that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion declaring the Commissioner’s hearing order untimely and void, as well as that portion of the opinion declaring that a petitioner seeking judicial review of an agency decision need not demonstrate a separate showing of prejudice.” Id. at 760 n. 3. | 4 | 2015–2026 |
Wisniewski v. Bennett
neutral
1 sentence1999Wisniewski v. Bennett, 693 N.E.2d 1341 (Ind.Ct.App.1998). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.
green
2 sentences1996Citing TSC Indus Inc., v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 445 , 96 S.Ct. 2126, 2130 , 48 L.Ed.2d 757 (1976), the commissioner applied the test of whether a reasonable purchaser or seller would consider the omitted or misstated fact material. 1996Citing TSC Indus Inc., v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 445 , 96 S.Ct. 2126, 2130 , 48 L.Ed.2d 757 (1976), the commissioner applied the test of whether a reasonable purchaser or seller would consider the omitted or misstated fact material. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.