7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hovnanian Land Investment Group, LLC v. Annapolis Towne Centre at Parole, LLCgreen2 sentences2016Grp., LLC v. Annapolis Towne Ctr. at Parole, LLC, 421 Md. 94, 123 , 25 A.3d 967 (2011) (“The party alleging waiver must show an intent to waive both the contract provision at issue and the non-waiver clause.”). *420 But we do not go quite as far as the City in declaring a ban against any and all waiver of that privilege (or the intermediate appellate court in elevating privilege over waiver as a matter of law). 2016Grp., LLC v. Annapolis Towne Ctr. at Parole, LLC, 421 Md. 94, 123 , 25 A.3d 967 (2011) (“The party alleging waiver must show an intent to waive both the contract provision at issue and the non-waiver clause.”). *420 But we do not go quite as far as the City in declaring a ban against any and all waiver of that privilege (or the intermediate appellate court in elevating privilege over waiver as a matter of law). | 1 | 1 |
120 West Fayette Street, LLLP v. Mayor of Baltimoregreen2 sentences2014Superblock III, 426 Md. at 27-29 , 43 A.3d at 363-64 (emphasis added). 2014Superblock III, 426 Md. at 27-29 , 43 A.3d at 363-64 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Freeman v. Stanbern Construction Co.green2 sentences2011See, e.g., Freeman, 205 Md. at 79 , 106 A.2d at 55 (“Of course, if the written contract provides that it shall not be varied except by an agreement in writing, it must appear that the parties understood that this clause was waived.”). 2011See, e.g., Freeman, 205 Md. at 79 , 106 A.2d at 55 (“Of course, if the written contract provides that it shall not be varied except by an agreement in writing, it must appear that the parties understood that this clause was waived.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Baltimore Police Dept. v. Antonin
green
2 sentences2023Baltimore Police Dep’t v. Antonin, 237 Md. 2023Baltimore Police Dep’t v. Antonin, 237 Md. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Pollock v. Patuxent Institution Board of Review
green
2 sentences2018Pollock , 374 Md. at 504 , 823 A.2d 626 . 2018Pollock , 374 Md. at 504 , 823 A.2d 626 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Consumer Protection Division v. Morgan
green
1 sentence2011Morgan did not meet the Withrow burden that a party alleging a violation of due process “must overcome a presumption of honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators.” Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.