6 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1892–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gaeth v. Newmangreen2 sentences2002The presumption is in favor of the certificate, and the burden is upon the party alleging such a defense to prove it.” ...’” Gaeth v. Newman, 188 Neb. 756, 766 , 199 N.W.2d 396, 403 (1972); Kucaba v. Kucaba, 146 Neb. 116 , 18 N.W.2d 645 (1945). 2002The presumption is in favor of the certificate, and the burden is upon the party alleging such a defense to prove it.” ...’” Gaeth v. Newman, 188 Neb. 756, 766 , 199 N.W.2d 396, 403 (1972); Kucaba v. Kucaba, 146 Neb. 116 , 18 N.W.2d 645 (1945). | 1 | 1 |
Staskiewicz v. Stategreen2 sentences1977See Staskiewicz v. State, 144 Neb. 581 , 14 N. W. 2d 184 (1944). *31 Defendants next contend that the District Court committed error in finding title to tract IV and V in plaintiff and several other defendants and in determining that defendants had no proprietary interest in tracts IV and V. 1977See Staskiewicz v. State, 144 Neb. 581 , 14 N. W. 2d 184 (1944). *31 Defendants next contend that the District Court committed error in finding title to tract IV and V in plaintiff and several other defendants and in determining that defendants had no proprietary interest in tracts IV and V. | 1 | 1 |
Thams v. Sharpgreen2 sentences1945See, also, Thams v. Sharp, 49 Neb. 237 , 68 N. W. 474; Coe v. Talcott, 130 Neb. 32 , 263 N. W. 596 . 1945See, also, Thams v. Sharp, 49 Neb. 237 , 68 N. W. 474; Coe v. Talcott, 130 Neb. 32 , 263 N. W. 596 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pebley v. Pebley
green
2 sentences2026PEBLEY Cite as 33 Neb. 2026PEBLEY Cite as 33 Neb. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Kucaba v. Kucaba
green
2 sentences2002The presumption is in favor of the certificate, and the burden is upon the party alleging such a defense to prove it.” ...’” Gaeth v. Newman, 188 Neb. 756, 766 , 199 N.W.2d 396, 403 (1972); Kucaba v. Kucaba, 146 Neb. 116 , 18 N.W.2d 645 (1945). 2002The presumption is in favor of the certificate, and the burden is upon the party alleging such a defense to prove it.” ...’” Gaeth v. Newman, 188 Neb. 756, 766 , 199 N.W.2d 396, 403 (1972); Kucaba v. Kucaba, 146 Neb. 116 , 18 N.W.2d 645 (1945). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Production Credit Ass'n v. Eldin Haussermann Farms, Inc.
green
2 sentences1998Production Credit Assn. v. Eldin Haussermann Farms, 247 Neb. 538 , 529 N.W.2d 26 (1995). 1998Production Credit Assn. v. Eldin Haussermann Farms, 247 Neb. 538 , 529 N.W.2d 26 (1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Coe v. Talcott
neutral
2 sentences1945See, also, Thams v. Sharp, 49 Neb. 237 , 68 N. W. 474; Coe v. Talcott, 130 Neb. 32 , 263 N. W. 596 . 1945See, also, Thams v. Sharp, 49 Neb. 237 , 68 N. W. 474; Coe v. Talcott, 130 Neb. 32 , 263 N. W. 596 . | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Phillips v. Bishop
neutral
2 sentences1945The presumption is in favor of the certificate, and the burden is upon the party alleging such a defense to prove it.” Phillips v. Bishop, 35 Neb. 487 , 53 N. W. 375 . 1945The presumption is in favor of the certificate, and the burden is upon the party alleging such a defense to prove it.” Phillips v. Bishop, 35 Neb. 487 , 53 N. W. 375 . | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Young v. Duvall
green
1 sentence1892This court, in passing upon a similar question in Pereau v. Frederick, 17 Neb., 117 , said: “It is contended on behalf of the defendant, and we think correctly, that the certificate of the officer taking the acknowledgment must stand against a mere conflict of evidence, whether the instrument was voluntarily signed, acknowledged, and delivered or not, and cannot be impeached except upon proof which clearly shows it to be false and fraudulent.” In Marston v. Brittenham, 76 Ill., 611 , supra, the court say: “To impeach such a certificate, the evidence should do more than produce a mere preponder | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Pereau v. Frederick
neutral
1 sentence1892This court, in passing upon a similar question in Pereau v. Frederick, 17 Neb., 117 , said: “It is contended on behalf of the defendant, and we think correctly, that the certificate of the officer taking the acknowledgment must stand against a mere conflict of evidence, whether the instrument was voluntarily signed, acknowledged, and delivered or not, and cannot be impeached except upon proof which clearly shows it to be false and fraudulent.” In Marston v. Brittenham, 76 Ill., 611 , supra, the court say: “To impeach such a certificate, the evidence should do more than produce a mere preponder | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Marston v. Brittenham
green
1 sentence1892This court, in passing upon a similar question in Pereau v. Frederick, 17 Neb., 117 , said: “It is contended on behalf of the defendant, and we think correctly, that the certificate of the officer taking the acknowledgment must stand against a mere conflict of evidence, whether the instrument was voluntarily signed, acknowledged, and delivered or not, and cannot be impeached except upon proof which clearly shows it to be false and fraudulent.” In Marston v. Brittenham, 76 Ill., 611 , supra, the court say: “To impeach such a certificate, the evidence should do more than produce a mere preponder | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.