Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Quaker Valley Farms, LLCgreen2 sentences2021In relevant part, the CR Act provides that: Any person who has been deprived of any substantive due process or equal protection rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or any substantive rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution or laws of this State, or whose exercise or enjoyment of those substantive rights, privileges or immunities has been interfered with or attempted to be interfered with, by threats, intimidation or coercion by a person acting under color of law, may bring a civil action for damages and for injunctive 2020Under the CRA, "the party alleging a claim must show a violation of a substantive right or that someone 'acting under color of law' interfered with or attempted to interfere with a substantive right." State v. Quaker Valley Farms, LLC, 235 N.J. 37, 64 (2018). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Jimenezgreen1 sentence2026See Cuff, 239 N.J. at 340 ("When the party alleging error A-1315-24 23 failed to object at trial to the verdict sheet, [appellate c]ourt[s] review[ of] the verdict sheet [is] . . . plain error"); see also Willner v. Vertical Reality, Inc., 235 N.J. 65, 79 (2018) ("[T]he failure to object to a jury charge instruction requires review under the plain error standard." (quoting State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 473 (2007))). | 1 | 1 |
Willner v. Vertical Reality, Inc.green1 sentence2026See Cuff, 239 N.J. at 340 ("When the party alleging error A-1315-24 23 failed to object at trial to the verdict sheet, [appellate c]ourt[s] review[ of] the verdict sheet [is] . . . plain error"); see also Willner v. Vertical Reality, Inc., 235 N.J. 65, 79 (2018) ("[T]he failure to object to a jury charge instruction requires review under the plain error standard." (quoting State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 473 (2007))). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Galiciagreen1 sentence2019State v. Galicia, 210 N.J. 364, 386 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024Ibid. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Morrissey v. Jackson
green
1 sentence1955Morrissey v. Jackson, 3 N.J. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.