Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
34 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 10 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Calleargreen2 sentences2023We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.” Miller v. Callear, 140 Idaho 213, 218 , 91 P.3d 1117, 1122 (2004) (citations omitted). 2023We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.” Miller v. Callear, 140 Idaho 213, 218 , 91 P.3d 1117, 1122 (2004) (citations omitted). | 11 | 12 |
Chelsea Reed v. Zane Reedgreen2 sentences2026“A party alleging error must also show that the error affected the party’s substantial rights.” Id. (citations omitted); see also I.R.E 103(a). 2024A party alleging error must also show that the error affected the party’s substantial rights.” Reed v. Reed, 160 Idaho 772, 775 , 379 P.3d 1042, 1045 (2016). | 3 | 4 |
State v. Zarinegargreen2 sentences2021Bureau v. Zarinegar, 167 Idaho 611, 627 , 474 P.3d 683, 699 (2020) (quoting State v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 162 Idaho 271, 276 , 396 P.3d 700, 705 (2017) (We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.”). 8 Still, when “the challenged conduct is likely to evade judicial review and thus is capable of repetition,” State v. Vasquez, 163 Idaho 557 , 560, 416 P.3d 108, 111 (2018), it is appropriate for this Court to comment – and we will do so here. 2021Bureau v. Zarinegar, 167 Idaho 611, 627 , 474 P.3d 683, 699 (2020) (quoting State v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 162 Idaho 271, 276 , 396 P.3d 700, 705 (2017) (We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.”). 8 Still, when “the challenged conduct is likely to evade judicial review and thus is capable of repetition,” State v. Vasquez, 163 Idaho 557 , 560, 416 P.3d 108, 111 (2018), it is appropriate for this Court to comment – and we will do so here. | 3 | 3 |
Saint Alphonsus Diversified Care, Inc. v. MRI Associates, LLPgreen2 sentences2017“A party alleging error on appeal must also show that the alleged errors were prejudicial.” Saint Alphonsus Diversified Care, Inc. v. MRI As socs., LLP, 157 Idaho 106, 122 , 334 P.3d 780, 796 (2014). “[A]lleged errors not affecting substantial rights will be disregarded.” Weinstein v. Prudential Prop. and Cas. 2017“A party alleging error on appeal must also show that the alleged errors were prejudicial.” Saint Alphonsus Diversified Care, Inc. v. MRI As socs., LLP, 157 Idaho 106, 122 , 334 P.3d 780, 796 (2014). “[A]lleged errors not affecting substantial rights will be disregarded.” Weinstein v. Prudential Prop. and Cas. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Victor Garcia-Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2021Bureau v. Zarinegar, 167 Idaho 611, 627 , 474 P.3d 683, 699 (2020) (quoting State v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 162 Idaho 271, 276 , 396 P.3d 700, 705 (2017) (We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.”). 8 Still, when “the challenged conduct is likely to evade judicial review and thus is capable of repetition,” State v. Vasquez, 163 Idaho 557 , 560, 416 P.3d 108, 111 (2018), it is appropriate for this Court to comment – and we will do so here. 2021Bureau v. Zarinegar, 167 Idaho 611, 627 , 474 P.3d 683, 699 (2020) (quoting State v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 162 Idaho 271, 276 , 396 P.3d 700, 705 (2017) (We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.”). 8 Still, when “the challenged conduct is likely to evade judicial review and thus is capable of repetition,” State v. Vasquez, 163 Idaho 557 , 560, 416 P.3d 108, 111 (2018), it is appropriate for this Court to comment – and we will do so here. | 2 | 3 |
Nathon A. Baughman v. Wells Fargo Bankgreen2 sentences2021Alleged errors not affecting substantial rights will be disregarded.” Baughman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 162 Idaho 174, 179, 395 P.3d 393, 398 (2017) (internal quotation and citations and omitted). 2021Alleged errors not affecting substantial rights will be disregarded.” Baughman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 162 Idaho 174, 179, 395 P.3d 393, 398 (2017) (internal quotation and citations and omitted). | 2 | 3 |
Bromund v. Bromundgreen2 sentences2026“A right is substantial if it could affect the outcome of litigation.” Bromund v. Bromund, 167 Idaho 925, 932 , 477 P.3d 979, 986 (2020) (citing Fonseca v. Corral Agric., Inc., 156 Idaho 142, 149 , 321 P.3d 692, 699 (2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sims v. Jacobson, 157 Idaho 980 , 342 P.3d 907 (2015)). 2026“A right is substantial if it could affect the outcome of litigation.” Bromund v. Bromund, 167 Idaho 925, 932 , 477 P.3d 979, 986 (2020) (citing Fonseca v. Corral Agric., Inc., 156 Idaho 142, 149 , 321 P.3d 692, 699 (2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sims v. Jacobson, 157 Idaho 980 , 342 P.3d 907 (2015)). | 2 | 2 |
Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.green2 sentences2026“A right is substantial if it could affect the outcome of litigation.” Bromund v. Bromund, 167 Idaho 925, 932 , 477 P.3d 979, 986 (2020) (citing Fonseca v. Corral Agric., Inc., 156 Idaho 142, 149 , 321 P.3d 692, 699 (2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sims v. Jacobson, 157 Idaho 980 , 342 P.3d 907 (2015)). 2026“A right is substantial if it could affect the outcome of litigation.” Bromund v. Bromund, 167 Idaho 925, 932 , 477 P.3d 979, 986 (2020) (citing Fonseca v. Corral Agric., Inc., 156 Idaho 142, 149 , 321 P.3d 692, 699 (2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sims v. Jacobson, 157 Idaho 980 , 342 P.3d 907 (2015)). | 2 | 2 |
Vanderwal v. Albar, Inc.green2 sentences2017Highway Dist. v. Total Success Investments, LLC, 145 Idaho 360, 368 , 179 P.3d 323, 331 (2008). “ ‘We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.’” VanderWal v. Albar, Inc., 154 Idaho 816, 822 , 303 P.3d 175, 181 (2013) (quoting Miller v. Callear, 140 Idaho 213, 218 , 91 P.3d 1117, 1122 (2004)). 2017Highway Dist. v. Total Success Investments, LLC, 145 Idaho 360, 368 , 179 P.3d 323, 331 (2008). “ ‘We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.’” VanderWal v. Albar, Inc., 154 Idaho 816, 822 , 303 P.3d 175, 181 (2013) (quoting Miller v. Callear, 140 Idaho 213, 218 , 91 P.3d 1117, 1122 (2004)). | 2 | 2 |
PHH Mortgage v. Nickersongreen2 sentences2017We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record." PHH Mortg. v. Nickerson , 160 Idaho 388 , 399, 374 P.3d 551 , 562 (2016) (internal quotations and citations omitted). 2017We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record." PHH Mortg. v. Nickerson , 160 Idaho 388 , 399, 374 P.3d 551 , 562 (2016) (internal quotations and citations omitted). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Vasquezgreen1 sentence2021Bureau v. Zarinegar, 167 Idaho 611, 627 , 474 P.3d 683, 699 (2020) (quoting State v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 162 Idaho 271, 276 , 396 P.3d 700, 705 (2017) (We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.”). 8 Still, when “the challenged conduct is likely to evade judicial review and thus is capable of repetition,” State v. Vasquez, 163 Idaho 557 , 560, 416 P.3d 108, 111 (2018), it is appropriate for this Court to comment – and we will do so here. | 1 | 1 |
Joseph Bolognese v. Paul Fortegreen2 sentences2019See Bolognese v. Forte, 153 Idaho 857, 866 , 292 P.3d 248, 257 (2012). 2019See Bolognese v. Forte, 153 Idaho 857, 866 , 292 P.3d 248, 257 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch Lasergreen2 sentences2019Ballard v. Kerr, 160 Idaho 674, 693 , 378 P.3d 464, 483 (2016) (citing Van v. Portneuf Med. 2019Ballard v. Kerr, 160 Idaho 674, 693 , 378 P.3d 464, 483 (2016) (citing Van v. Portneuf Med. | 1 | 1 |
Ada County Highway District v. Total Success Investment, LLCgreen2 sentences2017Highway Dist. v. Total Success Investments, LLC, 145 Idaho 360, 368 , 179 P.3d 323, 331 (2008). “ ‘We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.’” VanderWal v. Albar, Inc., 154 Idaho 816, 822 , 303 P.3d 175, 181 (2013) (quoting Miller v. Callear, 140 Idaho 213, 218 , 91 P.3d 1117, 1122 (2004)). 2017Highway Dist. v. Total Success Investments, LLC, 145 Idaho 360, 368 , 179 P.3d 323, 331 (2008). “ ‘We do not presume error on appeal; the party alleging error has the burden of showing it in the record.’” VanderWal v. Albar, Inc., 154 Idaho 816, 822 , 303 P.3d 175, 181 (2013) (quoting Miller v. Callear, 140 Idaho 213, 218 , 91 P.3d 1117, 1122 (2004)). | 1 | 1 |
Kootenai County v. Harriman-Saylergreen2 sentences2015Kootenai Cnty. v. Harriman-Sayler, 154 Idaho 13, 17 , 293 P.3d 637, 641 (2012). 2015Kootenai Cnty. v. Harriman-Sayler, 154 Idaho 13, 17 , 293 P.3d 637, 641 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
Randy Poole v. Darin Davisgreen2 sentences2013Plaintiff has failed to present a record sufficient to review this assignment of error. “[U]nless the appellant affirmatively demonstrates error from the record, this Court presumes that the trial court’s decision was proper.” Poole v. Davis, 153 Idaho 604, 608 , 288 P.3d 821, 825 (2012). 2013Plaintiff has failed to present a record sufficient to review this assignment of error. “[U]nless the appellant affirmatively demonstrates error from the record, this Court presumes that the trial court’s decision was proper.” Poole v. Davis, 153 Idaho 604, 608 , 288 P.3d 821, 825 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. Spackmangreen2 sentences2012Finally, “[t]his Court will not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.” Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. Spackman, 150 Idaho 790, 812 , 252 P.3d 71, 93 (2011). 2012Finally, “[t]his Court will not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.” Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. Spackman, 150 Idaho 790, 812 , 252 P.3d 71, 93 (2011). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Keith A. Sims v. Dan S. Jacobson
green
2 sentences2026“A right is substantial if it could affect the outcome of litigation.” Bromund v. Bromund, 167 Idaho 925, 932 , 477 P.3d 979, 986 (2020) (citing Fonseca v. Corral Agric., Inc., 156 Idaho 142, 149 , 321 P.3d 692, 699 (2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sims v. Jacobson, 157 Idaho 980 , 342 P.3d 907 (2015)). 2026“A right is substantial if it could affect the outcome of litigation.” Bromund v. Bromund, 167 Idaho 925, 932 , 477 P.3d 979, 986 (2020) (citing Fonseca v. Corral Agric., Inc., 156 Idaho 142, 149 , 321 P.3d 692, 699 (2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sims v. Jacobson, 157 Idaho 980 , 342 P.3d 907 (2015)). | 2 | 2023–2026 |
Knipe Land Co. v. Robertson
green
1 sentence2023“The party alleging waiver must show a clear intention by the other party to waive before waiver will be established.” Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Seaport Citizens Bank v. Dippel
green
1 sentence2020Id. (citation omitted). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Woods v. Crouse
green
2 sentences2004Woods v. Crouse, 101 Idaho 764 , 620 P.2d 798 (1980). 2004Woods v. Crouse, 101 Idaho 764 , 620 P.2d 798 (1980). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.