7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bigley v. Cravengreen2 sentences2012The party alleging error must show that the instructions had a tendency to confuse or mislead the jury before this court will consider reversal, Bigley v. Craven, 769 P.2d 892, 895 (Wyo.1989). 1996Prejudicial error is never presumed, McWilliams, 893 P.2d at 1148 ; Bigley, 769 P.2d at 895 , but must be established by the party alleging error. | 3 | 3 |
Walker v. Stategreen2 sentences2012In order to show plain error, the party alleging error must demonstrate: "1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error, 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law, and 3) the party claiming error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him." Walker, 2012 WY 1, ¶ 6 , 267 P.3d at 1110 (citations omitted). [¶ 7] Here, while the record is clear that the report was admitted into evidence, we need not determine whether a clear and unequivocal rule of law was violated because father has failed to prove that, if there was error, it was prejudic 2012In order to show plain error, the party alleging error must demonstrate: "1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error, 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law, and 3) the party claiming error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him." Walker, 2012 WY 1, ¶ 6 , 267 P.3d at 1110 (citations omitted). [¶ 7] Here, while the record is clear that the report was admitted into evidence, we need not determine whether a clear and unequivocal rule of law was violated because father has failed to prove that, if there was error, it was prejudic | 1 | 1 |
TZ Land & Cattle Co. v. Condictgreen2 sentences2010Id.; TZ Land & Cattle Co. v. Condict, 795 P.2d 1204, 1211 (Wyo.1990). 2010Id. ; TZ Land & Cattle Co. v. Condict, 795 P.2d 1204, 1211 (Wyo. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
Warhawk v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Warhawk v. State, 849 P.2d 1326, 1327 (Wyo.1993) (quoting Rands v. State, 818 P.2d 44, 48 (Wyo.1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Rands v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Warhawk v. State, 849 P.2d 1326, 1327 (Wyo.1993) (quoting Rands v. State, 818 P.2d 44, 48 (Wyo.1991)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Landsiedel v. BUFFALO PROPERTIES, LLC.
green
1 sentence2020“The burden of establishing plain error is on the party alleging error.” Id. [¶59] The alleged errors are clearly reflected in the record. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Reichert v. State
green
1 sentence2010Id. ; TZ Land & Cattle Co. v. Condict, 795 P.2d 1204, 1211 (Wyo. 1990). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
McWilliams v. Wilhelm Ex Rel. Wilhelm
green
1 sentence1996Prejudicial error is never presumed, McWilliams, 893 P.2d at 1148 ; Bigley, 769 P.2d at 895 , but must be established by the party alleging error. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.