Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maine opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Robert S.green2 sentences2017See In re Roben S., 2009 ME 18, ¶ 15 , 966 A.2d 894 . 2017See In re Roben S., 2009 ME 18, ¶ 15 , 966 A.2d 894 . | 4 | 4 |
In re Cameron B.green2 sentences2017See In re Cameron B., 2017 ME 18, ¶¶ 10-11 , 164 A.3d 1199 . [¶2] Based on evidence presented during a three-day hearing held in December 2016 and January 2017, the court found by clear and convincing evidence, both directly and based on a statutory presumption of unfitness, see 22 M.R.S. § 4055(1-A)(E), 1 that the parents are unable to protect the child from jeopardy and that those circumstances are unlikely to change within a time calculated to meet the child’s needs, see id. § 4055(l)(B)(2)(b)(i). 2017See In re Cameron B., 2017 ME 18, ¶¶ 10-11 , 164 A.3d 1199 . [¶2] Based on evidence presented during a three-day hearing held in December 2016 and January 2017, the court found by clear and convincing evidence, both directly and based on a statutory presumption of unfitness, see 22 M.R.S. § 4055(1-A)(E), 1 that the parents are unable to protect the child from jeopardy and that those circumstances are unlikely to change within a time calculated to meet the child’s needs, see id. § 4055(l)(B)(2)(b)(i). | 4 | 4 |
Franks v. Delawaregreen1 sentence2019Warner, Shultz, and York also requested that, if the court determined that the affidavits presented to search the account data were supported by probable cause, the court conduct a Franks v. Delaware hearing to determine whether the detective or the trooper deliberately or with reckless disregard for the truth made false statements in his affidavit. 438 U.S. 154, 171-72 (1978). [¶13] On December 14, 2016, the Superior Court (Murphy, J.) held a nontestimonial hearing and, after determining that the defendants made a sufficient preliminary showing to justify a hearing, held a three-day hearing f | 1 | 1 |
In re Cameron B.green1 sentence2017See In re Cameron B., 2017 ME 18, ¶¶ 10-11 , 154 A.3d 1199 . [¶2] Based on evidence presented during a three-day hearing held in December 2016 and January 2017, the court found by clear and convincing evidence, both directly and based on a statutory presumption of unfitness, see 2 22 M.R.S. § 4055(1-A)(E),1 that the parents are unable to protect the child from jeopardy and that those circumstances are unlikely to change within a time calculated to meet the child’s needs, see id. § 4055(1)(B)(2)(b)(i). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Thomas D.
green
2 sentences2018See 22 M.R.S. § 4055(1)(B)(2)(b)(i)-(ii), (iv) ; In re Thomas D. , 2004 ME 104 , ¶ 21, 854 A.2d 195 . 2018See 22 M.R.S. § 4055(1)(B)(2)(b)(i)-(ii), (iv) ; In re Thomas D. , 2004 ME 104 , ¶ 21, 854 A.2d 195 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.