three-day hearing (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

three-day hearing in New Jersey

6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Strickland v. Washingtongreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017After the three-day hearing, Judge Donohue issued 1 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.

2017After the three-day hearing, Judge Donohue issued 1 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.

11
State v. Fritzgreen
nj · 1987 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Ed. 2d 674, 693 (1984), adopted by New Jersey in State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 (1987)). 2 The Court held due to "the history of this case and the prior rulings entered in connection with the PCR petition, we direct, in an abundance of caution, that a different judge be assigned to conduct the new evidentiary hearing." Pierre-Louis, supra, 216 N.J. at 580 . 4 A-0790-15T1 a thorough and well-reasoned written decision denying PCR because defendant did not satisfy the two-prong Strickland-Fritz3 ineffective assistance of counsel standard, which requires a showing of the particular manner in whic

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Harz v. Borough of Spring Lake green
nj · 2018
1 sentence

2022Ibid.

12022–2022
State v. Holland green
njsuperctappdiv · 2011
1 sentence

2018Holland II , 423 N.J.

12018–2018
State v. Fedner Pierre-Louis (071552) green
nj · 2014
1 sentence

2017Ed. 2d 674, 693 (1984), adopted by New Jersey in State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 (1987)). 2 The Court held due to "the history of this case and the prior rulings entered in connection with the PCR petition, we direct, in an abundance of caution, that a different judge be assigned to conduct the new evidentiary hearing." Pierre-Louis, supra, 216 N.J. at 580 . 4 A-0790-15T1 a thorough and well-reasoned written decision denying PCR because defendant did not satisfy the two-prong Strickland-Fritz3 ineffective assistance of counsel standard, which requires a showing of the particular manner in whic

12017–2017
State v. Michael Lamb (071262) green
nj · 2014
1 sentence

2017The Lamb Court found the probable cause to arrest defendant and the stepfather's exit from the residence were not "designed to prevent either occupant from objecting to the warrantless search." Id. at 320 . 5 A-5132-14T4 Here, the trial judge conducted a three-day hearing and considered the testimony of six witnesses, including the arresting officers and witnesses presented by defendant.

12017–2017
State v. Perkins green
njsuperctappdiv · 2003
2 sentences

2007Citing State v. Perkins, 358 N.J.Super. 151 , 817 A.2d 364 (App.Div.2003), the court held that the gun was inadmissible because weapons obtained pursuant to a *118 domestic violence search warrant generally may not be admitted in a subsequent criminal proceeding.

2007Citing State v. Perkins, 358 N.J.Super. 151 , 817 A.2d 364 (App.Div.2003), the court held that the gun was inadmissible because weapons obtained pursuant to a *118 domestic violence search warrant generally may not be admitted in a subsequent criminal proceeding.

12007–2007
County of Hudson v. Department of Corrections neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 1997
2 sentences

1997The Appellate Division ruled that the regulation was valid and enforceable and ordered the State to transfer the juveniles within the three-day time period as required by the regulation. 300 N.J.Super. 389 , 693 A.2d 146 (1997).

1997The Appellate Division ruled that the regulation was valid and enforceable and ordered the State to transfer the juveniles within the three-day time period as required by the regulation. 300 N.J.Super. 389 , 693 A.2d 146 (1997).

11997–1997

Where else courts name it

TX 12 (1961–2022) OH 7 (1990–2024) ME 7 (2017–2019) NJ 6 (1997–2022) FL 6 (1977–2018) CA 6 (1975–2025) NY 6 (1982–2006) CO 5 (2016–2024) LA 5 (1958–2021) PA 3 (1984–2022) IN 3 (1983–2003) AZ 3 (1955–2024) MT 3 (2013–2016) CT 3 (1991–2012) GA 3 (2009–2024) OK 2 (2013–2017) MA 2 (1992–1995) MD 2 (1974–2002) AR 2 (2011–2014) IL 2 (2019–2021) NM 2 (2001–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check