Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
COASTAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. Fallsgreen2 sentences2019Rather, “an appearance may arise by implication when a defendant takes, seeks, or agrees to some step in the proceedings that is beneficial to himself or detrimental to the plaintiff.” Id. (citations omitted); see Coastal Fed. Credit Union v. Falls, 217 N.C. App. 100, 103-07 , 718 S.E.2d 192, 194-96 (2011) (concluding the defendants’ negotiations with the plaintiff’s law firm regarding a payment plan could qualify as an “appearance,” thereby entitling the defendants to notice of the default judgment hearing); Webb v. James, 46 N.C. App. 551, 557 , 265 S.E.2d 642, 646 (1980) (holding “when [a] 2019Rather, “an appearance may arise by implication when a defendant takes, seeks, or agrees to some step in the proceedings that is beneficial to himself or detrimental to the plaintiff.” Id. (citations omitted); see Coastal Fed. Credit Union v. Falls, 217 N.C. App. 100, 103-07 , 718 S.E.2d 192, 194-96 (2011) (concluding the defendants’ negotiations with the plaintiff’s law firm regarding a payment plan could qualify as an “appearance,” thereby entitling the defendants to notice of the default judgment hearing); Webb v. James, 46 N.C. App. 551, 557 , 265 S.E.2d 642, 646 (1980) (holding “when [a] | 1 | 2 |
Webb v. Jamesgreen2 sentences2019Rather, “an appearance may arise by implication when a defendant takes, seeks, or agrees to some step in the proceedings that is beneficial to himself or detrimental to the plaintiff.” Id. (citations omitted); see Coastal Fed. Credit Union v. Falls, 217 N.C. App. 100, 103-07 , 718 S.E.2d 192, 194-96 (2011) (concluding the defendants’ negotiations with the plaintiff’s law firm regarding a payment plan could qualify as an “appearance,” thereby entitling the defendants to notice of the default judgment hearing); Webb v. James, 46 N.C. App. 551, 557 , 265 S.E.2d 642, 646 (1980) (holding “when [a] 2019Rather, “an appearance may arise by implication when a defendant takes, seeks, or agrees to some step in the proceedings that is beneficial to himself or detrimental to the plaintiff.” Id. (citations omitted); see Coastal Fed. Credit Union v. Falls, 217 N.C. App. 100, 103-07 , 718 S.E.2d 192, 194-96 (2011) (concluding the defendants’ negotiations with the plaintiff’s law firm regarding a payment plan could qualify as an “appearance,” thereby entitling the defendants to notice of the default judgment hearing); Webb v. James, 46 N.C. App. 551, 557 , 265 S.E.2d 642, 646 (1980) (holding “when [a] | 1 | 1 |
Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp.green2 sentences2019In Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp., our Court recognized when an agent of a defendant corporation negotiates with the opposing party, the agent can “make an implied appearance on behalf of [the] corporation[.]” 155 N.C. App. 205, 208 , 573 S.E.2d 547, 549 (2002). 2019In Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp., our Court recognized when an agent of a defendant corporation negotiates with the opposing party, the agent can “make an implied appearance on behalf of [the] corporation[.]” 155 N.C. App. 205, 208 , 573 S.E.2d 547, 549 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. City of Raleighgreen1 sentence2005App. at 337 , 520 S.E.2d at 137 (“[Representation of self and failure to hire counsel, even when a party is not well educated or is unacquainted with the judicial process, does not constitute excusable neglect.”) Lastly, we note that Jacobs argues he was entitled to, yet did not receive, three days notice of the default judgment hearing. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Basnight Construction Co. v. Peters & White Construction Co.
green
2 sentences2022Id. at 624, 610 S.E.2d at 472 . ¶ 27 In this case, Plaintiff’s 2009 unverified complaint alleged that Defendant was lawfully indebted to Plaintiff for the principal sum of $10,500.69 together with interest at a contract rate of 23.99% per annum, that the unpaid amount had been outstanding since 1 February 2008, and that Plaintiff was entitled to calculable attorneys’ fees and costs under N.C. Gen. 2022Id. at 624, 610 S.E.2d at 472 . ¶ 27 In this case, Plaintiff’s 2009 unverified complaint alleged that Defendant was lawfully indebted to Plaintiff for the principal sum of $10,500.69 together with interest at a contract rate of 23.99% per annum, that the unpaid amount had been outstanding since 1 February 2008, and that Plaintiff was entitled to calculable attorneys’ fees and costs under N.C. Gen. | 4 | 2020–2022 |
Roland v. W & L Motor Lines, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019Rather, “an appearance may arise by implication when a defendant takes, seeks, or agrees to some step in the proceedings that is beneficial to himself or detrimental to the plaintiff.” Id. (citations omitted); see Coastal Fed. Credit Union v. Falls, 217 N.C. App. 100, 103-07 , 718 S.E.2d 192, 194-96 (2011) (concluding the defendants’ negotiations with the plaintiff’s law firm regarding a payment plan could qualify as an “appearance,” thereby entitling the defendants to notice of the default judgment hearing); Webb v. James, 46 N.C. App. 551, 557 , 265 S.E.2d 642, 646 (1980) (holding “when [a] | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.