Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'ngreen2 sentences2004In Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass’n, Inc. , 226 N.W.2d 370, 376 (N.D. 1975), we noted that class actions “have always been recognized and encouraged under our laws since prior to Statehood.” Rule 23, N.D.R.Civ.P., is a remedial rule for efficient resolution of the claims or liabilities of many individuals in a single action, eliminating repetitious litigation and possibly inconsistent adjudications involving common questions, related events, or requests for similar relief, and providing an effective procedure for those whose economic position is such that it is unrealistic to ex 2004In Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass’n, Inc., 226 N.W.2d 370, 376 (N.D.1975), we noted that class actions “have always been recognized and encouraged under our laws since prior to Statehood.” Rule 23, N.D.R.Civ.P., is a remedial rule for efficient resolution of the claims or liabilities of many individuals in a single action, eliminating repetitious litigation and possibly inconsistent adjudications involving common questions, related events, or requests for similar relief, and providing an effective procedure for those whose economic position is such that it is unrealistic to expe | 5 | 5 |
Old Broadway Corp. v. Hjellegreen1 sentence1998Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass’n, 226 N.W.2d 370, 376 (N.D.1975); see also Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 82 ; Saba, 307 N.W.2d at 593. 4 [¶ 11] Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 23 the court may certify an action as a class action if the following four requirements are satisfied: 1. | 1 | 1 |
Saba v. COUNTIES OF BARNES, BENSON, ETC.green1 sentence1998Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass’n, 226 N.W.2d 370, 376 (N.D.1975); see also Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 82 ; Saba, 307 N.W.2d at 593. 4 [¶ 11] Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 23 the court may certify an action as a class action if the following four requirements are satisfied: 1. | 1 | 1 |
James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgiagreen2 sentences1992See Beam, supra, ___ U.S. at ____, 111 S.Ct. at 2443 , 115 L.Ed.2d at 487-88 ("Subject to possible constitutional thresholds... the remedial inquiry is one governed by state law, at least where the case originates in state court."). 1992See Beam, supra, ___ U.S. at ____, 111 S.Ct. at 2443 , 115 L.Ed.2d at 487-88 ("Subject to possible constitutional thresholds... the remedial inquiry is one governed by state law, at least where the case originates in state court."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peterson v. Dougherty Dawkins, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003Peterson v. Dougherty Dawkins, Inc., 1998 ND 159, ¶ 10 , 583 N.W.2d 626 (quoting Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass’n, Inc., 226 N.W.2d 370, 376 (N.D.1975)). [¶ 8] Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 23, the trial court may certify a class action if the following four requirements are satisfied: 1. 2003Peterson v. Dougherty Dawkins, Inc., 1998 ND 159, ¶ 10 , 583 N.W.2d 626 (quoting Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass’n, Inc., 226 N.W.2d 370, 376 (N.D.1975)). [¶ 8] Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 23, the trial court may certify a class action if the following four requirements are satisfied: 1. | 2 | 2002–2003 |
Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C.
green
2 sentences2015Howe v. Microsoft Corp., 2003 ND 12, ¶ 6 , 656 N.W.2d 285 . [¶ 7] “Rule 23, ND.R.Civ.P., is a remedial rule for efficient resolution of the claims or liabilities of many individuals in a single action, eliminating repetitious litigation and possibly inconsistent adjudications involving common questions, related events, or requests for similar relief. ...” Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., 2004 ND 113, ¶ 7 , 681 N.W.2d 74 . 2015Howe v. Microsoft Corp., 2003 ND 12, ¶ 6 , 656 N.W.2d 285 . [¶ 7] “Rule 23, ND.R.Civ.P., is a remedial rule for efficient resolution of the claims or liabilities of many individuals in a single action, eliminating repetitious litigation and possibly inconsistent adjudications involving common questions, related events, or requests for similar relief. ...” Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., 2004 ND 113, ¶ 7 , 681 N.W.2d 74 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Howe v. Microsoft Corp.
green
2 sentences2015Howe v. Microsoft Corp., 2003 ND 12, ¶ 6 , 656 N.W.2d 285 . [¶ 7] “Rule 23, ND.R.Civ.P., is a remedial rule for efficient resolution of the claims or liabilities of many individuals in a single action, eliminating repetitious litigation and possibly inconsistent adjudications involving common questions, related events, or requests for similar relief. ...” Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., 2004 ND 113, ¶ 7 , 681 N.W.2d 74 . 2015Howe v. Microsoft Corp., 2003 ND 12, ¶ 6 , 656 N.W.2d 285 . [¶ 7] “Rule 23, ND.R.Civ.P., is a remedial rule for efficient resolution of the claims or liabilities of many individuals in a single action, eliminating repetitious litigation and possibly inconsistent adjudications involving common questions, related events, or requests for similar relief. ...” Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., 2004 ND 113, ¶ 7 , 681 N.W.2d 74 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.