fatal error (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

fatal error in Nebraska

7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1909–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Gonzalez v. State neutral
neb · 1929
2 sentences

1999In Gonzalez v. State, 119 Neb. 13 , 226 N.W. 801 (1929), the Nebraska Supreme Court stated that a judgment of contempt must state the facts constituting the contempt, and a judgment which merely states the *672 conclusion of the court will not sustain a sentence for imprisonment for contempt.

1999In Gonzalez v. State, 119 Neb. 13 , 226 N.W. 801 (1929), the Nebraska Supreme Court stated that a judgment of contempt must state the facts constituting the contempt, and a judgment which merely states the *672 conclusion of the court will not sustain a sentence for imprisonment for contempt.

21999–1999
Dill v. Farmers Co-operative Co. neutral
neb · 1937
2 sentences

1948This court, in Dill v. Farmers Co-operative Co., 132 Neb. 256 , 271 N. W. 692 , held: “Where the facts stated in a petition show that plaintiff is entitled to damages of some sort, it is not a fatal error that the pleader has mistaken the rule by which such damages should be measured.” See; also, Kraft v. Rice, 45 App. Div. (N. Y.) 569, 61 N. Y.

1948This court, in Dill v. Farmers Co-operative Co., 132 Neb. 256 , 271 N. W. 692 , held: “Where the facts stated in a petition show that plaintiff is entitled to damages of some sort, it is not a fatal error that the pleader has mistaken the rule by which such damages should be measured.” See; also, Kraft v. Rice, 45 App. Div. (N. Y.) 569, 61 N. Y.

21948–1976
Tastee Inn, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Co. green
neb · 1958
2 sentences

1999In Gonzalez v. State, 119 Neb. 13 , 226 N.W. 801 (1929), the Supreme Court stated, in significant part: “A judgment of [direct] contempt must state the facts constituting the contempt, and a judgment which merely states the conclusion of the court will not sustain a sentence of imprisonment for contempt.” (Syllabus of the court.) This case is cited in Tastee Inn, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Co., Inc., 167 Neb. 264 , 92 N.W.2d 664 (1958).

1999In Gonzalez v. State, 119 Neb. 13 , 226 N.W. 801 (1929), the Supreme Court stated, in significant part: “A judgment of [direct] contempt must state the facts constituting the contempt, and a judgment which merely states the conclusion of the court will not sustain a sentence of imprisonment for contempt.” (Syllabus of the court.) This case is cited in Tastee Inn, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Co., Inc., 167 Neb. 264 , 92 N.W.2d 664 (1958).

11999–1999
Ronald Drake v. Donald W. Wyrick, Warden green
ca8 · 1981
1 sentence

1983Drake v. Wyrick, supra. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

11983–1983
Rothery v. Pounds green
neb · 1948
2 sentences

1976Dill v. Farmers Co-operative Co., 132 Neb. 256 , 271 N. W. 692 (1937); Rothery v. Pounds, 150 Neb. 25 , 33 N. W. 2d 347 (1948).

1976Dill v. Farmers Co-operative Co., 132 Neb. 256 , 271 N. W. 692 (1937); Rothery v. Pounds, 150 Neb. 25 , 33 N. W. 2d 347 (1948).

11976–1976
Colrick v. . Swinburne green
ny · 1887
2 sentences

1948Supp. 368 ; Colrick v. Swinburne, 105 N. Y. 503 , 12 N. E. 427 ; 1 Bancroft, Code Pleading, § 164, p. 281.

1948Supp. 368 ; Colrick v. Swinburne, 105 N. Y. 503 , 12 N. E. 427 ; 1 Bancroft, Code Pleading, § 164, p. 281.

11948–1948
Kraft v. Rice neutral
nyappdiv · 1899
1 sentence

1948This court, in Dill v. Farmers Co-operative Co., 132 Neb. 256 , 271 N. W. 692 , held: “Where the facts stated in a petition show that plaintiff is entitled to damages of some sort, it is not a fatal error that the pleader has mistaken the rule by which such damages should be measured.” See; also, Kraft v. Rice, 45 App. Div. (N. Y.) 569, 61 N. Y.

11948–1948
Crain v. United States red
scotus · 1896
1 sentence

1913The plea by attorney is no plea.” In Crain v. United States, 162 U. S. 625 , it was said: “Until the accused pleads to the indictment and thereby indicates the issue submitted by him for trial, there is nothing for the jury to try.” So far as we have made an examination of the cases cited by the attorney general, there is a difference in the proceedings or a difference in llie statute, so that the cases are not in point.

11913–1913
Wilson v. State green
miss · 1872
1 sentence

1913Without a plea there was no issue to try.” In State v. Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105 , it was said of the failure to arraign the defendant: “This is a fatal error, and it is for the legislature, and not for this court, to change the law on the subject.” In Wilson v. State, 42 Miss. 639 , the court said: “The defendant cannot waive his arraignment, nor can he plead by attorney.

11913–1913
State v. Vanhook neutral
mo · 1885
1 sentence

1913Without a plea there was no issue to try.” In State v. Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105 , it was said of the failure to arraign the defendant: “This is a fatal error, and it is for the legislature, and not for this court, to change the law on the subject.” In Wilson v. State, 42 Miss. 639 , the court said: “The defendant cannot waive his arraignment, nor can he plead by attorney.

11913–1913
Knights of the Maccabees of the World v. Nitsch neutral
neb · 1903
1 sentence

1909Knights of the Maccabees of the World v. Nitsch, 69 Neb. 372 .

11909–1909

Where else courts name it

PA 87 (1896–2026) CA 29 (1892–2024) MS 25 (1907–2026) TN 22 (1944–2026) NY 20 (1848–2014) NC 20 (1896–2020) TX 20 (1873–2026) LA 17 (1903–2024) OH 17 (1988–2024) AL 14 (1849–2012) IL 13 (1884–2025) MO 12 (1882–1993) NJ 11 (2005–2026) WA 10 (1918–2020) KS 10 (1872–2024) IN 9 (1881–2020) CO 8 (1875–2018) WV 8 (1883–2009) FL 8 (1981–2022) NE 7 (1909–1999) ID 6 (1923–2026) MI 6 (1856–2024) GA 6 (2010–2022) AR 6 (1935–2003) KY 5 (1974–2018) WI 5 (1849–2023) IA 5 (1883–2025) UT 4 (1986–2025) CT 3 (2003–2019) PR 3 (1941–1970) OK 3 (1943–1989) VT 3 (1978–2013) MA 2 (1939–1985) NM 2 (1926–1957) AZ 2 (1978–2006) MD 2 (2008–2012) DE 2 (2017–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check