Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gerber v. Gerbergreen2 sentences2000The Nebraska Supreme Court has found that job-related changes are legitimate reasons for moving a child out of the jurisdiction when there is a "reasonable expectation of improvement in the career or occupation of the custodial parent." Gerber v. Gerber, 225 Neb. 611, 619 , 407 N.W.2d 497, 503 (1987). 2000The Nebraska Supreme Court has found that job-related changes are legitimate reasons for moving a child out of the jurisdiction when there is a "reasonable expectation of improvement in the career or occupation of the custodial parent." Gerber v. Gerber, 225 Neb. 611, 619 , 407 N.W.2d 497, 503 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Interest of Angelica L.
green
2 sentences2021Because at this stage of inquiry we are concerned with the future well-being of the children, the result of Juana’s offenses is highly relevant here. 39 Whereas in In re Interest of Angelica L. & Daniel L., the mother’s charge resulted in her deportation, Juana has been granted asylum and will soon have authorization to work. 40 Therefore, while she was alleged to have committed more offenses than the 36 In re Interest of Angelica L. & Daniel L., supra note 6, 277 Neb. at 1007 , 767 N.W.2d at 93 . 37 Id. 38 Brief for appellant at 39. 39 Kenneth C. v. Lacie H., supra note 16. 40 See In re Inter 2021Because at this stage of inquiry we are concerned with the future well-being of the children, the result of Juana’s offenses is highly relevant here. 39 Whereas in In re Interest of Angelica L. & Daniel L., the mother’s charge resulted in her deportation, Juana has been granted asylum and will soon have authorization to work. 40 Therefore, while she was alleged to have committed more offenses than the 36 In re Interest of Angelica L. & Daniel L., supra note 6, 277 Neb. at 1007 , 767 N.W.2d at 93 . 37 Id. 38 Brief for appellant at 39. 39 Kenneth C. v. Lacie H., supra note 16. 40 See In re Inter | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Farnsworth v. Farnsworth
green
2 sentences2000While some legitimate motives might seem less compelling than othersfor example, meeting the demands of a second marriage as compared to accommodating a specific health concernnone should be summarily rejected at this stage of the analysis without weighing the other considerations and how they all come to bear on the overall impact on the child. 257 Neb. at 250 , 597 N.W.2d at 598 . 2000While some legitimate motives might seem less compelling than othersfor example, meeting the demands of a second marriage as compared to accommodating a specific health concernnone should be summarily rejected at this stage of the analysis without weighing the other considerations and how they all come to bear on the overall impact on the child. 257 Neb. at 250 , 597 N.W.2d at 598 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Korth v. Korth
green
1 sentence2022Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Jack v. Clinton
green
2 sentences2005McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, supra. See, also, Vogel v. Vogel, supra; Brown v. Brown, supra; Jack v. Clinton, supra; Farnsworth v. Farnsworth, supra. Further, “while some legitimate explanations ‘might seem less compelling than others . . . none should be summarily rejected at this stage of the analysis without weighing the other considerations and how they all come to bear on the overall impact on the child.’ ” Jack v. Clinton, 259 Neb. at 207 , 609 N.W.2d at 334-35 , quoting Farnsworth v. Farnsworth, supra. The evidence in the present case indicates that Brian is an involved noncustodial father 2005McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, supra. See, also, Vogel v. Vogel, supra; Brown v. Brown, supra; Jack v. Clinton, supra; Farnsworth v. Farnsworth, supra. Further, “while some legitimate explanations ‘might seem less compelling than others . . . none should be summarily rejected at this stage of the analysis without weighing the other considerations and how they all come to bear on the overall impact on the child.’ ” Jack v. Clinton, 259 Neb. at 207 , 609 N.W.2d at 334-35 , quoting Farnsworth v. Farnsworth, supra. The evidence in the present case indicates that Brian is an involved noncustodial father | 1 | 2005–2005 |
cluster 783133
green
1 sentence2004At this stage of the analysis, the question is which of the “competing causes are generally capable of causing the patient’s symptoms.” Id. at 1057-58 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.