Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Santanagreen2 sentences2016Cf., e.g., Santana, 427 U.S. at 42 ("In Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), we recognized the right of police, who had probable cause to believe that an armed robber had entered a house a few 14 No. 2014AP304-CR minutes before, to make a warrantless entry to arrest the robber and to search for weapons."). 2016Cf., e.g., Santana, 427 U.S. at 42 ("In Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), we recognized the right of police, who had probable cause to believe that an armed robber had entered a house a few 14 No. 2014AP304-CR minutes before, to make a warrantless entry to arrest the robber and to search for weapons."). | 3 | 3 |
Johnson v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1971Aguilar is relevant at this stage of the inquiry as well because the tests it establishes were designed to implement the long-standing principle that probable cause must be determined by a ‘neutral and detached magistrate,’ and not by ‘the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime.’ Johnson v. United States, 333 U. S. 10, 14 (1948). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden
green
2 sentences2016Cf., e.g., Santana, 427 U.S. at 42 ("In Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), we recognized the right of police, who had probable cause to believe that an armed robber had entered a house a few 14 No. 2014AP304-CR minutes before, to make a warrantless entry to arrest the robber and to search for weapons."). 2016Cf., e.g., Santana, 427 U.S. at 42 ("In Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), we recognized the right of police, who had probable cause to believe that an armed robber had entered a house a few 14 No. 2014AP304-CR minutes before, to make a warrantless entry to arrest the robber and to search for weapons."). | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Kenefick v. Hitchcock
green
2 sentences2015Id. at 74-75 ("Rather than raising the issue in court, an insurer cannot deliberately reach its own conclusion on coverage and then maintain that a clause in the policy would have excused it from indemnifying had the coverage issue correctly been decided by a court originally.") Two years later, in Kenefick v. Hitchcock, 187 Wis. 2d 218 , 522 N.W.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1994), the court once again clearly, and unequivocally, reiterated the rule set forth in Grube: The nature of that claim is such that — ignoring, as we must at this stage of the inquiry, both the merits of the claim and any exclusiona 2015Id. at 74-75 ("Rather than raising the issue in court, an insurer cannot deliberately reach its own conclusion on coverage and then maintain that a clause in the policy would have excused it from indemnifying had the coverage issue correctly been decided by a court originally.") Two years later, in Kenefick v. Hitchcock, 187 Wis. 2d 218 , 522 N.W.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1994), the court once again clearly, and unequivocally, reiterated the rule set forth in Grube: The nature of that claim is such that — ignoring, as we must at this stage of the inquiry, both the merits of the claim and any exclusiona | 2 | 2015–2016 |
State v. Derango
green
1 sentence2002Derango, 2000 WI 89 at ¶ 30 ; see also Wis. Stat. § 939.65 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.