Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jenkinsgreen2 sentences2024To warrant a reversal under this standard, the "error at trial must be sufficient to raise 'reasonable doubt . . . as to whether the error led the jury to a result it otherwise might not have reached.'" State v. Funderburg, A-0233-22 17 225 N.J. 66, 79 (2016) (quoting State v. Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347, 361 (2004)). 2023To warrant a reversal under this standard, the "error [at trial]must be sufficient to raise 'reasonable doubt . . . as to whether the error led the jury to a result it otherwise migh t not have reached.'" State v. Funderburg, 225 N.J. 66, 79 (2016) (quoting State v. Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347, 361 (2004)). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Lee Funderburg (074760)green2 sentences2024To warrant a reversal under this standard, the "error at trial must be sufficient to raise 'reasonable doubt . . . as to whether the error led the jury to a result it otherwise might not have reached.'" State v. Funderburg, A-0233-22 17 225 N.J. 66, 79 (2016) (quoting State v. Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347, 361 (2004)). 2023To warrant a reversal under this standard, the "error [at trial]must be sufficient to raise 'reasonable doubt . . . as to whether the error led the jury to a result it otherwise migh t not have reached.'" State v. Funderburg, 225 N.J. 66, 79 (2016) (quoting State v. Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347, 361 (2004)). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Sanchez-Medinagreen2 sentences2024"To determine whether an alleged error rises to the level of plain error, it 'must be evaluated in light of the overall strength of the State's case.'" State v. Clark, 251 N.J. 266 , 287 (2022) (quoting State v. Sanchez-Medina, 231 N.J. 452, 468 (2018)). 2023"To determine whether an alleged error rises to the level of plain error, it 'must be evaluated "in light of the overall strength of t he State's case."'" State v. Clark, 251 N.J. 266 , 287 (2022) (quoting State v. Sanchez-Medina, 231 N.J. 452, 468 (2018)). | 2 | 2 |
Gordon v. Noelgreen2 sentences2002Id. at 11-12 , 120 A. 2d 263 ; see Gordon v. Noel, 356 N.W. 2d 559, 565 (Iowa 1984). 2002Id. at 11-12 , 120 A.2d 263 ; see Gordon v. Noel, 356 N.W.2d 559, 565 (Iowa 1984). | 2 | 2 |
Bruton v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1985See Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 137 , 88 S.Ct. 1620, 1628 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). 1985See Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 137 , 88 S.Ct. 1620, 1628 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
Untermyer v. Andersongreen2 sentences1984Or, stated another way: The need of the government for revenue has hitherto been deemed a sufficient justification for making a tax measure retroactive whenever the imposition seemed consonant with justice and the conditions were not such as would ordinarily involve hardship. [Id. at 375 (quoting with approval Untermyer v. Anderson, 276 U.S. 440, 450 , 48 S.Ct 353, 356 , 72 L.Ed. 645, 649 (1928)) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).] The hardship that exacerbates the unfairness of retroactive application of the agency rule here is that the reversal of the rule has transformed a statutory agent for the 1984Or, stated another way: The need of the government for revenue has hitherto been deemed a sufficient justification for making a tax measure retroactive whenever the imposition seemed consonant with justice and the conditions were not such as would ordinarily involve hardship. [Id. at 375 (quoting with approval Untermyer v. Anderson, 276 U.S. 440, 450 , 48 S.Ct 353, 356 , 72 L.Ed. 645, 649 (1928)) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).] The hardship that exacerbates the unfairness of retroactive application of the agency rule here is that the reversal of the rule has transformed a statutory agent for the | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MACCIA EX REL. MACCIA v. Tynes
green
2 sentences2002Although our courts have not considered the issue in a criminal context, in Maccia v. Tynes, 39 N.J.Super. 1, 10 , 120 A.2d 263 (App.Div.1956), we held that in a civil case “where two issues are left to a jury, either of which may be determinative of the case, and a general verdict is brought in, making it impossible to ascertain upon which of the issues the verdict was founded ... there must be a reversal even if the error infects only one of the issues.” We found this to be the more equitable result. 2002Although our courts have not considered the issue in a criminal context, in Maccia v. Tynes, 39 N.J.Super. 1, 10 , 120 A.2d 263 (App.Div.1956), we held that in a civil case “where two issues are left to a jury, either of which may be determinative of the case, and a general verdict is brought in, making it impossible to ascertain upon which of the issues the verdict was founded ... there must be a reversal even if the error infects only one of the issues.” We found this to be the more equitable result. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Yarbough
red
1 sentence2022To warrant a reversal under this standard, the "error must be sufficient to raise 'reasonable 5 State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 (1995). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.