Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1926–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ricegreen1 sentence2014Rice, 184 S.W.3d at 683 (appendix). | 1 | 1 |
Cartwright v. Smithgreen1 sentence1926See Cartwright v. Smith, 104 Tenn., 689 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Poe v. State
green
2 sentences2005Additionally, the Poe court said that the then-existing harmless error statute, Tennessee Code Annotated section 27-117, “did not preclude a reversal for an error affecting the result of the trial or depriving the accused of his constitutional right to a fair trial by jury.” Id. at 419-21 , 370 S.W.2d at 491-92 ; see Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-117 (precluding reversal for non-prejudicial error) (repealed, 1981 Pub. 2005Additionally, the Poe court said that the then-existing harmless error statute, Tennessee Code Annotated section 27-117, “did not preclude a reversal for an error affecting the result of the trial or depriving the accused of his constitutional right to a fair trial by jury.” Id. at 419-21 , 370 S.W.2d at 491-92 ; see Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-117 (precluding reversal for non-prejudicial error) (repealed, 1981 Pub. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Sambolin v. State
green
2 sentences1970Sambolin v. State, 215 Tenn. 569 , 387 S.W.2d 817 , dealt with the erroneous introduction of evidence, as does our case sub judice; but the valid ground for objection was grounded upon statute rather than the constitution. 1970Sambolin v. State, 215 Tenn. 569 , 387 S.W.2d 817 , dealt with the erroneous introduction of evidence, as does our case sub judice; but the valid ground for objection was grounded upon statute rather than the constitution. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Dykes v. State
green
2 sentences1963Dykes v. State, 201 Tenn. 65, 68-69 , 296 S.W.2d 861 , and cases there cited; Tenn. Gas. 1963Dykes v. State, 201 Tenn. 65, 68-69 , 296 S.W.2d 861 , and cases there cited; Tenn. Gas. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.