7 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Duncan v. City of Nichols Hillsgreen2 sentences2025Id. ¶29, 913 P.2d at 1310. 2025Id. ¶29, 913 P.2d at 1310 . | 1 | 1 |
Bosh v. Cherokee County Building Authorityred2 sentences2017Civil Rights Violation ¶31 In his amended petition, Plaintiff claims "the actions of the Defendant are additionally [a] violation of the Plaintiff's Civil Rights." Defendant argues in his motion for summary judgment that he "is entitled to summary judgment with regard to Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for a civil rights violation against Sheriff Lester in his official capacity." In response, Plaintiff asserts that his civil rights violation "is premised on outrageous acts of the officer done intentionally without disregard to the health and safety of the Plaintiff." In his supplemental res 2017Civil Rights Violation ¶31 In his amended petition, Plaintiff claims "the actions of the Defendant are additionally [a] violation of the Plaintiff's Civil Rights." Defendant argues in his motion for summary judgment that he "is entitled to summary judgment with regard to Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for a civil rights violation against Sheriff Lester in his official capacity." In response, Plaintiff asserts that his civil rights violation "is premised on outrageous acts of the officer done intentionally without disregard to the health and safety of the Plaintiff." In his supplemental res | 1 | 1 |
Irwin v. SWO Acquisition Corp.green2 sentences2016Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc. , 2007 OK 79, ¶ 26 , 178 P.3d 170, 177 . 7 See also Irwin v. SWO Acquisition Corp ., 1992 OK CIV APP 48, ¶ 13 , 830 P.2d 587, 590 (citing Alsup v. Skaggs Drug Center , 1949 OK 136 , 223 P.2d 530 , for holding "[f]alse arrest is the unlawful restraint of an individual against his will."). 2016Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc. , 2007 OK 79, ¶ 26 , 178 P.3d 170, 177 . 7 See also Irwin v. SWO Acquisition Corp ., 1992 OK CIV APP 48, ¶ 13 , 830 P.2d 587, 590 (citing Alsup v. Skaggs Drug Center , 1949 OK 136 , 223 P.2d 530 , for holding "[f]alse arrest is the unlawful restraint of an individual against his will."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeCorte v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2016Nor has Shaw pleaded "excessive force conduct" against City or its police officers, based either on 1) negligence or other "delictual theory” of recovery, see Morales, n. 35, 2) a violation of art. 2, § 30 of the Oklahoma Constitution, see Perry v. City of Norman, 2014 OK 119 , 341 P.3d 689 , or 3) a civil rights violation, see Decorte v. Robinson, 1998 OK 87 , 969 P.2d 358 . 6 .Before granting summary judgment a trial court must consider and rule out all theories of liability raised by the evidentiary material presented. 2016Nor has Shaw pleaded "excessive force conduct" against City or its police officers, based either on 1) negligence or other "delictual theory” of recovery, see Morales, n. 35, 2) a violation of art. 2, § 30 of the Oklahoma Constitution, see Perry v. City of Norman, 2014 OK 119 , 341 P.3d 689 , or 3) a civil rights violation, see Decorte v. Robinson, 1998 OK 87 , 969 P.2d 358 . 6 .Before granting summary judgment a trial court must consider and rule out all theories of liability raised by the evidentiary material presented. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc., 2007 OK 79, ¶ 26 , 178 P.3d 170, 177 . 7 . 2016Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc., 2007 OK 79, ¶ 26 , 178 P.3d 170, 177 . 7 . | 2 | 2016–2016 |
PERRY v. CITY OF NORMAN
green
2 sentences2016Nor has Shaw pleaded "excessive force conduct" against City or its police officers, based either on 1) negligence or other "delictual theory” of recovery, see Morales, n. 35, 2) a violation of art. 2, § 30 of the Oklahoma Constitution, see Perry v. City of Norman, 2014 OK 119 , 341 P.3d 689 , or 3) a civil rights violation, see Decorte v. Robinson, 1998 OK 87 , 969 P.2d 358 . 6 .Before granting summary judgment a trial court must consider and rule out all theories of liability raised by the evidentiary material presented. 2016Nor has Shaw pleaded "excessive force conduct" against City or its police officers, based either on 1) negligence or other "delictual theory” of recovery, see Morales, n. 35, 2) a violation of art. 2, § 30 of the Oklahoma Constitution, see Perry v. City of Norman, 2014 OK 119 , 341 P.3d 689 , or 3) a civil rights violation, see Decorte v. Robinson, 1998 OK 87 , 969 P.2d 358 . 6 .Before granting summary judgment a trial court must consider and rule out all theories of liability raised by the evidentiary material presented. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Alsup v. Skaggs Drug Center
green
2 sentences2016Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc. , 2007 OK 79, ¶ 26 , 178 P.3d 170, 177 . 7 See also Irwin v. SWO Acquisition Corp ., 1992 OK CIV APP 48, ¶ 13 , 830 P.2d 587, 590 (citing Alsup v. Skaggs Drug Center , 1949 OK 136 , 223 P.2d 530 , for holding "[f]alse arrest is the unlawful restraint of an individual against his will."). 2016Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc. , 2007 OK 79, ¶ 26 , 178 P.3d 170, 177 . 7 See also Irwin v. SWO Acquisition Corp ., 1992 OK CIV APP 48, ¶ 13 , 830 P.2d 587, 590 (citing Alsup v. Skaggs Drug Center , 1949 OK 136 , 223 P.2d 530 , for holding "[f]alse arrest is the unlawful restraint of an individual against his will."). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Holman by and Through Holman v. Wheeler
green
2 sentences1999Because Mr. Wirtz had not alleged a civil rights claim under Federal law, the Wirtz Court limited its consideration to a common law tort claim and concluded the 1984 amendment which added subsection B to § 153 effectively abrogated the holding of the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Holman v. Wheeler, 1983 OK 72 , 677 P.2d 645 , that claims against employees who acted outside the scope of their employment were not covered by the GTCA’s notice requirements. . 1999Because Mr. Wirtz had not alleged a civil rights claim under Federal law, the Wirtz Court limited its consideration to a common law tort claim and concluded the 1984 amendment which added subsection B to § 153 effectively abrogated the holding of the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Holman v. Wheeler, 1983 OK 72 , 677 P.2d 645 , that claims against employees who acted outside the scope of their employment were not covered by the GTCA’s notice requirements. . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.
green
1 sentence1996Tate, 833 P.2d at 1228 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Felder v. Casey
green
2 sentences1996In support of his contention that the notice provisions of the Act cannot be applied to shorten the time for bringing a civil rights claim, Duncan relies on the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988). 1996In support of his contention that the notice provisions of the Act cannot be applied to shorten the time for bringing a civil rights claim, Duncan relies on the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Ricky Houston v. Allen Reich, Harold Dean McHam the Excise Board of Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and the City of Hugo, Oklahoma
green
1 sentence1993In Houston v. Reich, 932 F.2d 883 (10th C.C.A.1991), the plaintiff brought suit in federal court against police officers and the city, alleging a beating that amounted to a civil rights violation. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.