Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
JOHN SMITH VS. ARVIND R. DATLA, M.D.(L-1527-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)green1 sentence2025See Smith v. Datla, 451 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Norman Z. Flick v. Julie W. Alba and Peter M. Carlsongreen1 sentence2025Winn v. Dep't of Corr., No. 09-1653, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17204 , at *4 (3d Cir. July 28, 2009) (quoting Davis v. Goord, 320 F.3d 346, 352-53 (2d Cir. 2003) and Flick v. Alba, 932 F.2d 728, 729 (11th Cir. 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Goordgreen1 sentence2025Winn v. Dep't of Corr., No. 09-1653, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17204 , at *4 (3d Cir. July 28, 2009) (quoting Davis v. Goord, 320 F.3d 346, 352-53 (2d Cir. 2003) and Flick v. Alba, 932 F.2d 728, 729 (11th Cir. 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Wilbur Richardson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole Attorney General of Pennsylvaniagreen1 sentence2022In that case, which involves a civil rights claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 , the Third Circuit Court of [N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.56(c) (1979) (emphasis added).] A-1889-20 43 Appeals held that retroactive application of the 1997 amendment would violate the ex post facto clause if discovery were to show "that the Board implemented the all-information provision in a way that created a significant risk of prolonging [the inmate's] incarceration,"—a "fact-sensitive inquiry." Id. at 260 (quoting Richardson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 423 F.3d 282, 291 (3d Cir. 2005)). | 1 | 1 |
Filgueiras v. Newark Pub. Schoolsgreen1 sentence2021Sch., where this court explained that "[t]he elements of a A-4112-19 15 substantive due process claim under the CRA are the same as those under § 1983." 426 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.green2 sentences1994See, e.g., Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 399 Mass. 93 , 502 N.E.2d 1375 (1987) (holding that under Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, defen dant may be liable for interference with rights of another even if defendant had no personal desire to abridge those rights, but merely acquiesced to pressure from third parties who did wish to abrogate such rights). 1994See, e.g., Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 399 Mass. 93 , 502 N.E.2d 1375 (1987) (holding that under Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, defen dant may be liable for interference with rights of another even if defendant had no personal desire to abridge those rights, but merely acquiesced to pressure from third parties who did wish to abrogate such rights). | 1 | 1 |
T & M HOMES, INC. v. Township of Mansfieldgreen1 sentence1988T & M Homes v. Mansfield, 162 N.J.Super. 497, 506 (Law Div.1978). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence1985In State v. Smith, 113 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Heck v. Humphrey
green
2 sentences2026Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), provides that when a plaintiff’s civil rights claim necessarily impugns the validity of a criminal proceeding, the claim does not accrue until the criminal proceeding has been terminated in the plaintiff’s favor. 2026Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), provides that when a plaintiff’s civil rights claim necessarily impugns the validity of a criminal proceeding, the claim does not accrue until the criminal proceeding has been terminated in the plaintiff’s favor. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Webb v. County Board of Education
green
1 sentence2022The County asserts that under N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(f), "fee-shifting is limited to parties who prevailed in the 'action brought' . . . [in] the civil rights claim.'" The County maintains that "[n]o court interpreting the []NJCRA or the []L[aw] A[gainst] D[iscrimination] [N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -50] has held that statutory fee-shifting entitles a litigant to recover fees incident to their pursuit of an administrative remedy" nor permitted recovery for attorney fees "for administrative proceedings which went against the litigant, which were not necessary to the judicial action . . . , and which did not a | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Tumpson v. Farina
green
2 sentences2014Tumpson v. Farina, 431 N.J. 2014Id. at 182 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Uhlrig v. Harder
green
1 sentence2011In Uhlrig , the plaintiffs decedent was an activity therapist in a mental institution who was killed by a patient previously housed in a special unit reserved for the criminally insane, until hospital administrators closed the unit and integrated those patients into the general population. 64 F.3d 567 , 570-71. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Collins v. City of Harker Heights
green
2 sentences2011His widow attempted to assert a civil rights claim against the city. 503 U.S. at 117 , 112 S.Ct. at 1064 , 117 L.Ed.2d at 268 . 2011His widow attempted to assert a civil rights claim against the city. 503 U.S. at 117 , 112 S.Ct. at 1064 , 117 L.Ed.2d at 268 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
cluster 406428
green
1 sentence1999The power of the district court to grant interim attorney’s fees as to some significant and relatively discrete portion of a case, ... such as the liability phase, is in no way undermined by the fact that a formal, final judgment in favor of the plaintiff has not yet been rendered... [Yakowicz, supra, 683 F.2d at 781-82 .] Defendants argue that the above two cases do not support plaintiffs motion. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Washington
neutral
1 sentence1985Super. 117, 122 (App.Div. 1968), certif. den. 52 N.J. 487 (1968), for example, a statement by a landlord's agent to a white applicant indicating that she would be an acceptable *548 tenant was held admissible in a civil rights hearing as "verbal conduct" evidencing a pattern of discriminatory activity. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Cagle v. Cox
green
1 sentence1985In Cagle v. Cox, 87 F.R.D. 467 (E.D.Va. 1980), the court approved the taxation of an indigent plaintiff's expert witness fees against the losing party. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. Diamond
green
1 sentence1985Furthermore, Federal Rule 54(d) contains the identical provision found in New Jersey Rule 4:42-8, which allows costs to the "prevailing party." In Jones v. Diamond, 636 F. 2d 1364 (5th Cir.), cert. dism. sub. nom., Ledbetter v. Jones, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 27 , 69 L.Ed. 2d 1033 (1981), the court allowed expert fees and recognized a civil rights exception to the general rule precluding recovery of such fees as costs. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Page v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
green
2 sentences1985Page, supra, 332 F.Supp. at 1067 . 1985Page, supra, 332 F.Supp. at 1067 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Eddings v. Oklahoma
red
1 sentence1985Furthermore, Federal Rule 54(d) contains the identical provision found in New Jersey Rule 4:42-8, which allows costs to the "prevailing party." In Jones v. Diamond, 636 F. 2d 1364 (5th Cir.), cert. dism. sub. nom., Ledbetter v. Jones, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 27 , 69 L.Ed. 2d 1033 (1981), the court allowed expert fees and recognized a civil rights exception to the general rule precluding recovery of such fees as costs. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Ledbetter v. Jones
red
1 sentence1985Furthermore, Federal Rule 54(d) contains the identical provision found in New Jersey Rule 4:42-8, which allows costs to the "prevailing party." In Jones v. Diamond, 636 F. 2d 1364 (5th Cir.), cert. dism. sub. nom., Ledbetter v. Jones, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 27 , 69 L.Ed. 2d 1033 (1981), the court allowed expert fees and recognized a civil rights exception to the general rule precluding recovery of such fees as costs. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Csaky v. Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes, Inc.
red
1 sentence1985Furthermore, Federal Rule 54(d) contains the identical provision found in New Jersey Rule 4:42-8, which allows costs to the "prevailing party." In Jones v. Diamond, 636 F. 2d 1364 (5th Cir.), cert. dism. sub. nom., Ledbetter v. Jones, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 27 , 69 L.Ed. 2d 1033 (1981), the court allowed expert fees and recognized a civil rights exception to the general rule precluding recovery of such fees as costs. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Quilloin v. Walcott
green
2 sentences1980Quillon v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 511 (1978). 1980Quillon v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 511 (1978). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.