Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Missouri v. McNeelygreen2 sentences2023This departs from a foundational Fourth Amendment principle that requires probable cause be determined by a neutral and detached magistrate on a case-by-case basis." Stewart , 2019 OK CR 6 Missouri v. McNeely, this Court, in Stewart , rejected the claim that the dissipation of alcohol in a suspect's bloodstream creates a blanket and per se exigency, holding instead that, "[w]hether a warrantless blood test of a drunk suspect is reasonable must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances." Stewart , 2019 OK CR 6 McNeely, 569 U.S. at 156 ). 2023As did the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. McNeely, this Court, in Stewart , rejected the claim that the dissipation of alcohol in a suspect's bloodstream creates a blanket and per se exigency, holding instead that, "[w]hether a warrantless blood test of a drunk suspect is reasonable must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances." Stewart , 2019 OK CR 6, ¶ 5 , 442 P.3d at 161 (citing McNeely, 569 U.S. at 156 ). | 3 | 7 |
Kentucky v. Kinggreen2 sentences2019This pronouncement means that in addition to having probable cause to support the search, police must also obtain a warrant unless there is some exigent circumstance where "the needs of law enforcement [are] so compelling that a warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment." Id. , 569 U.S. at 148-49 , 133 S.Ct. at 1558 (quoting Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452, 460 , 131 S.Ct. 1849, 1856 , 179 L.Ed.2d 865 (2011)). 2019This pronouncement means that in addition to having probable cause to support the search, police must also obtain a warrant unless there is some exigent circumstance where "the needs of law enforcement [are] so compelling that a warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment." Id. , 569 U.S. at 148-49 , 133 S.Ct. at 1558 (quoting Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452, 460 , 131 S.Ct. 1849, 1856 , 179 L.Ed.2d 865 (2011)). | 1 | 2 |
Michigan v. Tylergreen2 sentences2016A warrantless search may be reasonable when "'there is compelling need for official action and no time to secure a warrant.'" Id. , 133 S.Ct. at 1559 ( quoting Michigan v. Tyler , 436 U.S. 499, 509, 98 S.Ct. 1942, 1949, 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978)). 2016A warrantless search may be reasonable when "'there is compelling need for official action and no time to secure a warrant.'" Id. , 133 S.Ct. at 1559 ( quoting Michigan v. Tyler , 436 U.S. 499, 509, 98 S.Ct. 1942, 1949, 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978)). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
STEWART v. STATE
green
2 sentences2023This departs from a foundational Fourth Amendment principle that requires probable cause be determined by a neutral and detached magistrate on a case-by-case basis." Stewart , 2019 OK CR 6 Missouri v. McNeely, this Court, in Stewart , rejected the claim that the dissipation of alcohol in a suspect's bloodstream creates a blanket and per se exigency, holding instead that, "[w]hether a warrantless blood test of a drunk suspect is reasonable must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances." Stewart , 2019 OK CR 6 McNeely, 569 U.S. at 156 ). 2023As did the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. McNeely, this Court, in Stewart , rejected the claim that the dissipation of alcohol in a suspect's bloodstream creates a blanket and per se exigency, holding instead that, "[w]hether a warrantless blood test of a drunk suspect is reasonable must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances." Stewart , 2019 OK CR 6, ¶ 5 , 442 P.3d at 161 (citing McNeely, 569 U.S. at 156 ). | 3 | 2023–2023 |
STEWART v. STATE
green
1 sentence2023As did the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. McNeely, this Court, in Stewart , rejected the claim that the dissipation of alcohol in a suspect's bloodstream creates a blanket and per se exigency, holding instead that, "[w]hether a warrantless blood test of a drunk suspect is reasonable must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances." Stewart , 2019 OK CR 6, ¶ 5 , 442 P.3d at 161 (citing McNeely, 569 U.S. at 156 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.