further evidentiary hearing (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

further evidentiary hearing in Pennsylvania

7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2026 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Arguelles v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parolegreen
pacommwct · 2006 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2025–2026
2 sentences

2026See Arguelles, 892 A.2d at 914 (“Here, the Board ordered a further evidentiary hearing on whether [the parolee] was entitled to credit for the time he spent at [the community corrections center].

2025See Arguelles, 892 A.2d at 914 (“Here, the Board ordered a further evidentiary hearing on whether [the parolee] was entitled to credit for the time he spent at [the community corrections center].

22
In Re Adoption of L.J.B.green
pa · 2011 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See In re Adoption of L.J.B., 18 A.3d 1098, 1110-1111 (remanding for an evidentiary hearing regarding change in circumstance of adoptive parent).

11
Commonwealth v. Smithgreen
pasuperct · 2015 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018See Commonwealth v. Smith, 121 A.3d 1049, 1052 (Pa. Super. 2015) (“the PCRA court can decline to hold a hearing if there is no genuine issue concerning any material fact and the petitioner is not entitled to post-conviction collateral relief, and no purpose would be served by any further proceedings.” (citation omitted)).

11
Commonwealth v. Gadsdengreen
pasuperct · 2003 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011In adopting Roe , the Touw Court expanded a petitioner’s rights on direct appeal to include adequate consultation with counsel. *684 Gadsden, 832 A.2d at 1087 (citations omitted).

11
Commonwealth v. Blagmangreen
pa · 1986 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986See: Commonwealth v. Blagman, 350 Pa.Super. 367, 370 , 504 A.2d 883, 885 (1986).

1986See: Commonwealth v. Blagman, 350 Pa.Super. 367, 370 , 504 A.2d 883, 885 (1986).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Lewis, W. v. Lewis, C. green
pasuperct · 2020
1 sentence

2025For the reasons set forth above, we vacate the August 21, 2024, amended divorce decree and the December 5, 2023, order,5 and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. ____________________________________________ parties’ prior cases, including [a previous Protection From Abuse] hearing, where the court made the rather remarkable credibility determination that [the h]usband ‘was playing the system like a Stradivarius.’” Lewis, 234 A.3d at 721 .

12025–2025

Where else courts name it

CA 25 (1973–2025) IL 15 (1977–2024) NY 14 (1977–2021) PA 7 (1986–2026) MD 6 (1970–2016) MO 6 (1974–2002) CT 6 (1996–2017) FL 5 (1970–2019) TN 5 (1983–2021) AL 5 (1972–2004) GA 4 (1975–2023) MN 4 (1991–2019) DC 4 (1986–2012) MA 4 (1981–2024) MI 3 (1977–2016) AZ 3 (1977–2016) NM 2 (1998–1998) CO 2 (1991–2026) KY 2 (1978–1978) WA 2 (2014–2014) IA 2 (2006–2006) HI 2 (2018–2018) NC 2 (2016–2016) WI 2 (1986–2020) NE 2 (2015–2022) OH 2 (1985–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check