6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cuda v. Cudagreen1 sentence2001See Cuda v. Cuda, 906 S.W.2d 757, 761 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Howellgreen1 sentence1998State v. Howell, 524 S.W.2d 11, 20 (Mo. banc 1975). | 1 | 1 |
Colbert v. Stategreen1 sentence1974Pauley v. State, 487 S.W.2d 565, 566 [3] (Mo.1972); Colbert v. State, 486 S.W.2d 219, 221 [2] (Mo.1972). | 1 | 1 |
Beach v. Stategreen1 sentence1974Also, and in addition to the foregoing, coupled with all that was available to the trial court from the transcript of the proceedings conducted when the guilty plea was entered and the transcript of the evidentiary hearing held on the prior Rule 27.26 motions, it could have reasonably found and concluded, without a further evidentiary hearing on the third motion that movant’s dissatisfaction with the conditions of the jail in which he was kept while awaiting trial is no ground for vacating a sentence following a guilty plea [Beach v. State, 488 S.W.2d 652, 655 [6] (Mo.1972)], and that movant’s | 1 | 1 |
Pauley v. Stategreen1 sentence1974Pauley v. State, 487 S.W.2d 565, 566 [3] (Mo.1972); Colbert v. State, 486 S.W.2d 219, 221 [2] (Mo.1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. State
green
1 sentence2002This testimony required a further evidentiary hearing to determine the value of Husband’s pension plan as required by In re Marriage of Beeler, 26 S.W.3d 610 (Mo.App.2000). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence1998In Finster and State v. Mitchell, 611 S.W.2d 211 (Mo. banc 1981), the courts ordered a supplemental hearing to determine whether a statement to police was voluntary rather than remanding for an entirely new trial. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1987In substance, the movant argues that black citizens were impermissibly excluded from the jury in violation of the principles laid down in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). 1987In substance, the movant argues that black citizens were impermissibly excluded from the jury in violation of the principles laid down in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.