Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Delaneygreen2 sentences2015In Ex parte Delaney, 207 S.W.3d 794 , 795–96 (Tex.Crim.App.2006), the defendant chose a similar procedural strategy; he pled guilty without an agreed recommended sentence, waived his right to appeal, and waived his right to a jury trial.6 The issue considered by this Court was whether the waiver of the right to appeal was made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently given the following circumstances: (1) the defendant signed the waiver before final adjudication and sentencing; (2) the waiver was not bargained for; and, (3) punishment was uncertain when the waiver was signed, but the range of 2009In Ex parte Delaney, 207 S.W.3d 794, 795-96 (Tex.Crim.App.2006), the defendant chose a similar procedural strategy; he pled guilty without an agreed recommended sentence, waived his right to appeal, and waived his right to a jury trial. 6 The issue considered by this Court was whether the waiver of the right to appeal was made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently given the following circumstances: (1) the defendant signed the waiver before final adjudication and sentencing; (2) the waiver was not bargained for; and, (3) punishment was uncertain when the waiver was signed, but the range of | 1 | 4 |
Blocker v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See Blocker v. State, 889 S.W.2d 506, 508 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, no pet.) (holding that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver where the defendant signed a waiver statement and no contradictory evidence was found in the record). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Monreal v. State
green
1 sentence2015Monreal 99 S.W.3d at 616 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Johnson v. Louisiana
red
2 sentences1983The Alabama Supreme Court, in holding that the confession was admissible, relied upon Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U.S. 356 , 92 S.Ct. 1620 , 32 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972). 1983The Alabama Supreme Court, in holding that the confession was admissible, relied upon Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U.S. 356 , 92 S.Ct. 1620 , 32 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.