Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1866–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Borrego v. Del Palaciogreen1 sentence2001Borrego v. Palacio , 445 S.W.2d 620, 621-22 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1969, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Indemnity Co. v. Ernst & Ernst
green
2 sentences1943In the Quinn case Chief Justice Moore took occasion, significantly, to expressly approve the holding in American Indemnity Co. v. Ernst & Ernst, 106 S.W.2d 763, 766 , writ of error refused, in which Justice Alexander speaking then for the Waco Court of Civil Appeals (now Chief Justice of this Court) held that under the limitation statute the wrongful act there involved was itself “regarded as the ground of the action” and was “not legally severable from its consequences.” Defendant contended in his application for the writ that “any conflicting or inconsistent allegations” must be “ignored” an 1943In the Quinn case Chief Justice Moore took occasion, significantly, to expressly approve the holding in American Indemnity Co. v. Ernst & Ernst, 106 S. W. (2d) 763 (writ of error refused) in which Justice Alexander speaking then for the Waco Court of Civil Appeals (now Chief Justice of this Court) held that under the limitation statute the wrongful act there involved was itself “regarded as the ground of the action” and was “not legally .severable from its consequences.” Defendant contended in his application for the writ that “any conflicting or inconsistent allegations” must be “ignored” and | 2 | 1943–1943 |
Joyner v. Christian
green
2 sentences1940The case of Joyner v. Christian, 131 Tex. 274 , 113 S.W.2d 1229 , might plausibly be urged to an extent to support plaintiffs’ contention here. 1940The case of Joyner v. Christian, 131 Tex. 274 , 113 S.W.2d 1229 , might plausibly be urged to an extent to support plaintiffs’ contention here. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Lambeth v. Turner
neutral
1 sentence1929Lambeth v. Turner, 1 Tex. 364 ; Hudson v. Wheeler, 34 Tex. 356 ; Robinson v. Davenport, 40 Tex. 334 ; George v. Vaughan, 55 Tex. 329 , and Carson v. Cock, 50 Tex. 325 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Hudson v. Wheeler
green
1 sentence1929Lambeth v. Turner, 1 Tex. 364 ; Hudson v. Wheeler, 34 Tex. 356 ; Robinson v. Davenport, 40 Tex. 334 ; George v. Vaughan, 55 Tex. 329 , and Carson v. Cock, 50 Tex. 325 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Carson v. Cock
neutral
1 sentence1929Lambeth v. Turner, 1 Tex. 364 ; Hudson v. Wheeler, 34 Tex. 356 ; Robinson v. Davenport, 40 Tex. 334 ; George v. Vaughan, 55 Tex. 329 , and Carson v. Cock, 50 Tex. 325 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Williams v. Warnell
neutral
1 sentence1925Williams v. Warnell, 28 Tex. 610 ; Johnson v. Cherokee Land, etc., Co., 82 Tex. 338 , 18 S. W. 476 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Johnson, Reaves & Johnson v. Cherokee Land & Iron Co.
neutral
2 sentences1925Williams v. Warnell, 28 Tex. 610 ; Johnson v. Cherokee Land, etc., Co., 82 Tex. 338 , 18 S. W. 476 . 1925Williams v. Warnell, 28 Tex. 610 ; Johnson v. Cherokee Land, etc., Co., 82 Tex. 338 , 18 S. W. 476 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Ecoles v. Hill
green
1 sentence1866(Eccles v. Hill, 13 Tex., 65, 68 .) The defendants in error were properly allowed to intervene in this cause. | 1 | 1866–1866 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.