7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brooks v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Brooks v. State, 990 S.W.2d 278, 287 (Tex. Crim.App.1999) (providing that admission of inadmissible evidence becomes harmless error if other evidence proving same fact is admitted elsewhere without objection); Smith v. State, 286 S.W.3d 282, 300 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. refd) (stating that “improper admission of evidence is harmless if the same or similar evidence is admitted without objection at another point in the trial”). | 1 | 1 |
Posey v. Stategreen1 sentence1980In his presence and view the bottles of substance in the white sacks were obtained from a pharmacy pursuant to a tendered prescription that Dugger speculated was false because in the name of a person other than the apparent customer, but that is a perfectly legal procedure, Posey v. State, 545 S.W.2d 162, 164 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977). 11 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Continental Coffee Products Co. v. Cazarez
green
2 sentences2008Co., 937 S.W.2d at 444 , 450–51; Santillan, 203 S.W.3d at 506 ; see also Jordan v. BAE Automated Sys., No. 05-96-01488-CV, 1998 WL 242413 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 15, 1998, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (upholding summary judgment because appellant admitted in deposition that he was discharged for taking a pain pill without a prescription in violation of company’s drug policy). 2008Co. , 937 S.W.2d at 444 , 450–51; Santillan , 203 S.W.3d at 506 ; see also Jordan v. BAE Automated Sys. , No. 05-96-01488-CV, 1998 WL 242413 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 15, 1998, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (upholding summary judgment because appellant admitted in deposition that he was discharged for taking a pain pill without a prescription in violation of company’s drug policy). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Santillan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008Co., 937 S.W.2d at 444 , 450–51; Santillan, 203 S.W.3d at 506 ; see also Jordan v. BAE Automated Sys., No. 05-96-01488-CV, 1998 WL 242413 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 15, 1998, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (upholding summary judgment because appellant admitted in deposition that he was discharged for taking a pain pill without a prescription in violation of company’s drug policy). 2008Co. , 937 S.W.2d at 444 , 450–51; Santillan , 203 S.W.3d at 506 ; see also Jordan v. BAE Automated Sys. , No. 05-96-01488-CV, 1998 WL 242413 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 15, 1998, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (upholding summary judgment because appellant admitted in deposition that he was discharged for taking a pain pill without a prescription in violation of company’s drug policy). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Ryder v. Insurance Company of North America
green
1 sentence2020See Lentz, 582 So. 10 2d at 986; Chance, 509 So. 2d at 599–600; Ryder, 282 So. 2d at 774–75.6 Appellants do not make any other arguments about whether they could still obtain Louisiana benefits. 3. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Chance v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
green
1 sentence2020See Lentz, 582 So. 10 2d at 986; Chance, 509 So. 2d at 599–600; Ryder, 282 So. 2d at 774–75.6 Appellants do not make any other arguments about whether they could still obtain Louisiana benefits. 3. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Springer v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Martinez v. Vidaurri
neutral
2 sentences1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . 1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Black v. Terry County
green
2 sentences1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . 1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Vidaurri v. Martinez
neutral
2 sentences1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . 1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Turner v. Live Oak County
green
2 sentences1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . 1952Turner v. Live Oak County, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1103 , error dismissed; Black v. Terry County, Tex. Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 685 ; Vidaurri v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 651 ; Martinez v. Vidaurri, Tex.Com.App., 275 S.W. 999 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.