Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2017–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Rahimigreen1 sentence2026See 602 U.S. at 690 . | 1 | 1 |
National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosivesgreen2 sentences2024See id. (“Texas argues that the ‘thorough and compelling’ historical 14 analysis in NRA satisfies this burden.”) (citing Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives (“NRA”), 700 F.3d 185 (5th Cir. 2012), abrogated by Bruen, 597 U.S. at 17 , 19 n.4). 2024See id. (“Texas argues that the ‘thorough and compelling’ historical 14 analysis in NRA satisfies this burden.”) (citing Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives (“NRA”), 700 F.3d 185 (5th Cir. 2012), abrogated by Bruen, 597 U.S. at 17 , 19 n.4). | 1 | 1 |
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruengreen2 sentences2024See id. (“Texas argues that the ‘thorough and compelling’ historical 14 analysis in NRA satisfies this burden.”) (citing Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives (“NRA”), 700 F.3d 185 (5th Cir. 2012), abrogated by Bruen, 597 U.S. at 17 , 19 n.4). 2024See id. (“Texas argues that the ‘thorough and compelling’ historical 14 analysis in NRA satisfies this burden.”) (citing Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives (“NRA”), 700 F.3d 185 (5th Cir. 2012), abrogated by Bruen, 597 U.S. at 17 , 19 n.4). | 1 | 1 |
Smith, Al Letroygreen2 sentences2019See generally Salinas v. State, 464 S.W.3d 363, 367 (Tex. Crim. 2019See generally Salinas v. State, 464 S.W.3d 363, 367 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Chapmangreen1 sentence2018See Chapman, 666 F.3d at 226 (applying intermediate scrutiny to Second Amendment claim of appellant found not to be a responsible citizen); see also Young, 896 F.3d at 1068 (“[I]ntermediate scrutiny is appropriate if the challenged law ‘does not implicate a core Second Amendment right, or does not place a substantial burden on the Second Amendment right.’” (citation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaiigreen1 sentence2018See Chapman, 666 F.3d at 226 (applying intermediate scrutiny to Second Amendment claim of appellant found not to be a responsible citizen); see also Young, 896 F.3d at 1068 (“[I]ntermediate scrutiny is appropriate if the challenged law ‘does not implicate a core Second Amendment right, or does not place a substantial burden on the Second Amendment right.’” (citation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
District of Columbia v. Heller
green
2 sentences2018Roman directs us to District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 , 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008), which recognized the Second Amendment right to possess a firearm for self-defense as a personal right. 2018Roman directs us to District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 , 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008), which recognized the Second Amendment right to possess a firearm for self-defense as a personal right. | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Bryan Range v. Attorney General United States
green
1 sentence2026The Range court considered Range’s entire criminal history in its analysis, and Miller has not provided any supporting authority for the premise that an as-applied Second Amendment analysis is limited to the predicate felony alleged in the indictment.5 Range, 124 F.4th at 223 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
United States v. Chester
green
1 sentence2017Chester, 628 F.3d at 682 -83 (citing Heller, 554 U.S. at 634-35 , 128 S.Ct. 2783 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.