Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1883–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Laibe Corp.green1 sentence2019See id. | 1 | 1 |
Wawrykow v. Stategreen1 sentence2009We do not understand the Stale to challenge, and we did not exercise our discretionary authority to review, the court of appeals' decision that appellant's act of striking the victim was "the legal equivalent of causing bodily injury” and "a threat to cause imminent bodily injury.” For purposes of this case, we will assume that appellant’s act of striking the victim was "the legal equivalent of causing bodily injury” and "a threat to cause imminent bodily injury.” See also Marrow v. State, 37 Tex.Crim. 330 , 39 S.W. 944 (1897) (defendant assaulted prosecutor by kicking him); Wawrykow v. State, | 1 | 1 |
Hennessey's Tavern, Inc. v. American Air Filter Co.green2 sentences1990See Hennessey’s Tavern v. American Air Filter, 204 Cal.App.3d 1351 , 251 Cal.Rptr. 859, 863 (1988) (issue of a stale claim could not be asserted by alter ego). 1990See Hennessey’s Tavern v. American Air Filter, 204 Cal.App.3d 1351 , 251 Cal.Rptr. 859, 863 (1988) (issue of a stale claim could not be asserted by alter ego). | 1 | 1 |
City of Fort Worth v. Johnsongreen2 sentences1985See, e.g., City of Fort Worth v. Johnson, 388 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.1964). 1985See, e.g., City of Fort Worth v. Johnson, 388 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.1964). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Leland v. Wilkinson
neutral
2 sentences1883Hart v. Carlisle, 27 Tex. 352 ; DeCordova v. Smith, 9 Tex. 150 ; Johnson v. Newman, 43 Tex. 642 ; Glasscock v. Nelson, 26 Tex. 154 ; Boone v. Chiles, 10 Peters, 223 ; Piatt v. Vattier, 9 Peters 414 ; 2 Story’s Equity, 1520. 1883Carlisle v. Hart, 27 Tex., 352 ; De Cordova v. Smith, 9 Tex., 150 ; Johnson v. Newman, 43 Tex., 612 ; Glasscock v. Wilson, 26 Tex., 154 ; Boone v. Chiles, 10 Peters, 223 ; Piatt v. Vattier, 9 Peters, 414 ; 2 Story’s Equity, 1520. | 2 | 1883–1883 |
Sv v. Rv
green
1 sentence2017For example, S.V. v. R.V. offers no support for the Estate’s claim that an estate can pursue a stale claim. 933 S.W.2d 1 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Marrow v. State
green
2 sentences2009We do not understand the Stale to challenge, and we did not exercise our discretionary authority to review, the court of appeals' decision that appellant's act of striking the victim was "the legal equivalent of causing bodily injury” and "a threat to cause imminent bodily injury.” For purposes of this case, we will assume that appellant’s act of striking the victim was "the legal equivalent of causing bodily injury” and "a threat to cause imminent bodily injury.” See also Marrow v. State, 37 Tex.Crim. 330 , 39 S.W. 944 (1897) (defendant assaulted prosecutor by kicking him); Wawrykow v. State, 2009We do not understand the Stale to challenge, and we did not exercise our discretionary authority to review, the court of appeals' decision that appellant's act of striking the victim was "the legal equivalent of causing bodily injury” and "a threat to cause imminent bodily injury.” For purposes of this case, we will assume that appellant’s act of striking the victim was "the legal equivalent of causing bodily injury” and "a threat to cause imminent bodily injury.” See also Marrow v. State, 37 Tex.Crim. 330 , 39 S.W. 944 (1897) (defendant assaulted prosecutor by kicking him); Wawrykow v. State, | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Gentry v. Credit Plan Corporation of Houston
green
1 sentence1990At the same time, if we were to apply limitations under these circumstances, it would effectively permit the corporate form to be used as a “cloak for fraud.” See Gentry, 528 S.W.2d at 575 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Johnson v. State
neutral
1 sentence1883Carlisle v. Hart, 27 Tex., 352 ; De Cordova v. Smith, 9 Tex., 150 ; Johnson v. Newman, 43 Tex., 612 ; Glasscock v. Wilson, 26 Tex., 154 ; Boone v. Chiles, 10 Peters, 223 ; Piatt v. Vattier, 9 Peters, 414 ; 2 Story’s Equity, 1520. | 1 | 1883–1883 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.