7 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leland v. Oregongreen2 sentences1995See Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790 , 72 S.Ct. 1002 , 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952) (constitutional under Fourteenth Amendment to place burden of proving insanity beyond a reasonable doubt on defendant). 1995See Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790 , 72 S.Ct. 1002 , 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952) (constitutional under Fourteenth Amendment to place burden of proving insanity beyond a reasonable doubt on defendant). | 1 | 1 |
Tangren v. Snydergreen2 sentences1989See also Tangren v. Snyder, 13 Utah 2d 95 , 368 P.2d 711 (1962) (applying liberal construction rule to requirements of the content of a claim against estate under prior statute). 1989See also Tangren v. Snyder, 13 Utah 2d 95 , 368 P.2d 711 (1962) (applying liberal construction rule to requirements of the content of a claim against estate under prior statute). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Visser
green
2 sentences2006Rule 11 case law is surely not, however, dispositive of what should likewise be required for juvenile courts to comply with rule 25 when dealing with underage offenders. ¶ 33 Much like the safeguards contained in rule 25, "the substantive goal of rule 11 is to ensure that defendants know of their rights and thereby understand the basic consequences of their decision to plead guilty." State v. Visser, 2000 UT 88, ¶ 11 , 22 P.3d 1242 . 2006Rule 11 case law is surely not, however, dispositive of what should likewise be required for juvenile courts to comply with rule 25 when dealing with underage offenders. ¶ 33 Much like the safeguards contained in rule 25, "the substantive goal of rule 11 is to ensure that defendants know of their rights and thereby understand the basic consequences of their decision to plead guilty." State v. Visser, 2000 UT 88, ¶ 11 , 22 P.3d 1242 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Robertson
green
1 sentence2005Reasonable doubt is doubt entertained by reasonable men and women and arises from the evidence, or lack of evidence, in the case. ¶ 3 Mr. Reyes asserted this instruction was improper because it did not pass the three-part content test announced in State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997), overruled on other grounds by State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 , ¶ 25 n. 11, 61 P.3d 1000 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Weeks
green
2 sentences2005Reasonable doubt is doubt entertained by reasonable men and women and arises from the evidence, or lack of evidence, in the case. ¶ 3 Mr. Reyes asserted this instruction was improper because it did not pass the three-part content test announced in State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997), overruled on other grounds by State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 , ¶ 25 n. 11, 61 P.3d 1000 . 2005Reasonable doubt is doubt entertained by reasonable men and women and arises from the evidence, or lack of evidence, in the case. ¶ 3 Mr. Reyes asserted this instruction was improper because it did not pass the three-part content test announced in State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997), overruled on other grounds by State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 , ¶ 25 n. 11, 61 P.3d 1000 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Dementas v. Estate of Tallas Ex Rel. First Security Bank
green
1 sentence1989In Dementas v. Estate of Tallas, 764 P.2d 628 (Utah Ct.App.1988), the claim filed was for $50,000 pursuant to a document executed by the deceased which was appended to the claim. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
PHILLIPS BY & THROUGH UTAH, ETC. v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1989In Phillips v. Jackson, 615 P.2d 1228 , 1234 (Utah 1980), inherent reliability “became the touchstone of admissibility” of expert scientific testimony. 1989In Phillips v. Jackson, 615 P.2d 1228 , 1234 (Utah 1980), inherent reliability "became the touchstone of admissibility" of expert scientific testimony. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Simpson
green
2 sentences1983Although our cases affirm the admissibility of evidence of flight, State v. Marasco, 81 Utah 325 , 17 P.2d 919 (1933); State v. Simpson, 120 Utah 596 , 236 P.2d 1077 (1951), the circumstances that will support a jury instruction on flight and the content of such an instruction present questions not yet answered by this Court. 1983Although our cases affirm the admissibility of evidence of flight, State v. Marasco, 81 Utah 325 , 17 P.2d 919 (1933); State v. Simpson, 120 Utah 596 , 236 P.2d 1077 (1951), the circumstances that will support a jury instruction on flight and the content of such an instruction present questions not yet answered by this Court. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. Marasco
green
2 sentences1983Although our cases affirm the admissibility of evidence of flight, State v. Marasco, 81 Utah 325 , 17 P.2d 919 (1933); State v. Simpson, 120 Utah 596 , 236 P.2d 1077 (1951), the circumstances that will support a jury instruction on flight and the content of such an instruction present questions not yet answered by this Court. 1983Although our cases affirm the admissibility of evidence of flight, State v. Marasco, 81 Utah 325 , 17 P.2d 919 (1933); State v. Simpson, 120 Utah 596 , 236 P.2d 1077 (1951), the circumstances that will support a jury instruction on flight and the content of such an instruction present questions not yet answered by this Court. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. Robison
neutral
2 sentences1983We approved a flight instruction in State v. Robison, 28 Utah 2d 90 , 498 P.2d 658 (1972), but the instruction was not quoted in that opinion. 1983We approved a flight instruction in State v. Robison, 28 Utah 2d 90 , 498 P.2d 658 (1972), but the instruction was not quoted in that opinion. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.