Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Whitfield v. Stategreen2 sentences1987Whitfield v. State, 479 So.2d 208, 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). 1986Whitfield v. State, 479 So.2d 208, 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). | 2 | 2 |
Port Everglades Terminal Co. v. Cantygreen1 sentence1971And again, at page 434 the Court said: "We take notice of the fact that despite the provision of the statute regarding the content of a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, in actual practice a simple letter to the Commission advising of a claimant's belief that he is entitled to compensation is treated as a claim and activates the processing of the matter as such." In a subsequent compensation case involving fees emanating from this Court, we repeated the language set out above as indicating that in practice a simple letter advising the Commission of a claimant's belie | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1987This rule requires, inter alia, that upon written request filed by the defense the prosecution must furnish a list of all witnesses whom the prosecuting attorney knows to have relevant information concerning the charged offense or any defense thereto. [*] The content of rule 3.220 was no doubt strongly influenced by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 1987This rule requires, inter alia, that upon written request filed by the defense the prosecution must furnish a list of all witnesses whom the prosecuting attorney knows to have relevant information concerning the charged offense or any defense thereto. [*] The content of rule 3.220 was no doubt strongly influenced by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). | 2 | 1986–1987 |
James Ernest Hitchcock v. State of Florida
green
1 sentence2018However, in Hitchcock, we explained that Hurst does not apply retroactively to death sentences that became final prior to the issuance of Ring based upon our earlier decision in Asay v. State, 210 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2016). - 16 - See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
green
2 sentences2018However, in Hitchcock , we explained that Hurst does not apply retroactively to death sentences that became final prior to the issuance of Ring based upon our earlier decision in Asay v. State , 210 So.3d 1 (Fla. 2016). 2018However, in Hitchcock, we explained that Hurst does not apply retroactively to death sentences that became final prior to the issuance of Ring based upon our earlier decision in Asay v. State, 210 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2016). - 16 - See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Caldwell v. Mississippi
green
2 sentences2018The exhibit list included a content analysis evaluation conducted by Dr. Moore which concluded that "[b]ased on the socio-legal standard established in Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 , 105 S.Ct. 2633 , 86 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985) we may conclude to a reasonable degree of sociological certainty the jury which recommended a sentence of death for Mr. Taylor in [ Taylor II ] was persuaded against the requisite level of attention to its responsibility through comments made by the court and prosecutor, and repeated by fellow members of the venire." Taylor intended to present Dr. Moore and introduce 2018The exhibit list included a content analysis evaluation conducted by Dr. Moore which concluded that "[b]ased on the socio-legal standard established in Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 , 105 S.Ct. 2633 , 86 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985) we may conclude to a reasonable degree of sociological certainty the jury which recommended a sentence of death for Mr. Taylor in [ Taylor II ] was persuaded against the requisite level of attention to its responsibility through comments made by the court and prosecutor, and repeated by fellow members of the venire." Taylor intended to present Dr. Moore and introduce | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Wetzler v. State
green
1 sentence1988The first Florida case discussing the doctrine of willful blindness appears to be Wetzler v. State, 455 So.2d 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.