Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ardinger v. Hummellgreen2 sentences2021Driving is a dangerous and highly regulated adult activity,42 and the State has an interest in holding traffic violators uniformly accountable for bad driving.43 A 40 State v. Ranstead, 421 P.3d 15, 20 (Alaska 2018). 41 See Planned Parenthood of the Great Nw. v. State, 375 P.3d 1122, 1137 (Alaska 2016). 42 See Ardinger v. Hummell, 982 P.2d 727, 731 (Alaska 1999) (“Children who physically control vehicles must, for public safety reasons, be held to an adult standard of care.”). 43 Cf. Titus v. State, Dep’t of Admin., Div. of Motor Vehicles, 305 P.3d 1271 , (continued...) -11- 7533 uniform penal 2017See Ardinger v. Hummell, 982 P.2d 727, 731 (Alaska 1999) (holding that minor drivers must be held to an adult standard of care for public safety reasons). 10 . | 2 | 2 |
Kuhns v. Bruggergreen2 sentences2003Korber & Co., 59 N.M. 33 , 278 P.2d 569, 571 (1954); Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331 , 135 A.2d 395, 401-02 (1957). [40] 282 Or. 279 , 578 P.2d 399 (1978). [41] Id. at 401 . [42] Id. at 403 . [43] Id. [44] Id. [45] Id. [46] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles § 8 (Discussion Draft 1999). [47] Id. § 8 cmt. f. [48] Id. § 8 cmt. g. 2003Korber & Co., 59 N.M. 33 , 278 P.2d 569, 571 (1954); Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331 , 135 A.2d 395, 401-02 (1957). [40] 282 Or. 279 , 578 P.2d 399 (1978). [41] Id. at 401 . [42] Id. at 403 . [43] Id. [44] Id. [45] Id. [46] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles § 8 (Discussion Draft 1999). [47] Id. § 8 cmt. f. [48] Id. § 8 cmt. g. | 2 | 2 |
Chaddock v. Taborgreen2 sentences2003For earlier cases declining to apply an adult standard of care to juveniles involved with firearms prior to the development of the adult-activity exception outlined in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, see Stephan v. Marlin Firearms Co., 353 F.2d 819, 824-25 (2d Cir.1965) (applying Connecticut law); Chaddock v. Tabor, 115 Mich. 27 , 72 N.W. 1093, 1095 (1897); Zamora v. J. 2003For earlier cases declining to apply an adult standard of care to juveniles involved with firearms prior to the development of the adult-activity exception outlined in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, see Stephan v. Marlin Firearms Co., 353 F.2d 819, 824-25 (2d Cir.1965) (applying Connecticut law); Chaddock v. Tabor, 115 Mich. 27 , 72 N.W. 1093, 1095 (1897); Zamora v. J. | 2 | 2 |
Zamora Ex Rel. Zamora v. J. Korber & Co.green2 sentences2003Korber & Co., 59 N.M. 33 , 278 P.2d 569, 571 (1954); Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331 , 135 A.2d 395, 401-02 (1957). [40] 282 Or. 279 , 578 P.2d 399 (1978). [41] Id. at 401 . [42] Id. at 403 . [43] Id. [44] Id. [45] Id. [46] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles § 8 (Discussion Draft 1999). [47] Id. § 8 cmt. f. [48] Id. § 8 cmt. g. 2003Korber & Co., 59 N.M. 33 , 278 P.2d 569, 571 (1954); Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331 , 135 A.2d 395, 401-02 (1957). [40] 282 Or. 279 , 578 P.2d 399 (1978). [41] Id. at 401 . [42] Id. at 403 . [43] Id. [44] Id. [45] Id. [46] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles § 8 (Discussion Draft 1999). [47] Id. § 8 cmt. f. [48] Id. § 8 cmt. g. | 2 | 2 |
Frances Metzger Wirth Stephan, Guardian of the Estate of Charles Wirth v. The Marlin Firearms Company, Inc.green2 sentences2003For earlier cases declining to apply an adult standard of care to juveniles involved with firearms prior to the development of the adult-activity exception outlined in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, see Stephan v. Marlin Firearms Co., 353 F.2d 819, 824-25 (2d Cir.1965) (applying Connecticut law); Chaddock v. Tabor, 115 Mich. 27 , 72 N.W. 1093, 1095 (1897); Zamora v. J. 2003For earlier cases declining to apply an adult standard of care to juveniles involved with firearms prior to the development of the adult-activity exception outlined in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, see Stephan v. Marlin Firearms Co., 353 F.2d 819, 824-25 (2d Cir.1965) (applying Connecticut law); Chaddock v. Tabor, 115 Mich. 27 , 72 N.W. 1093, 1095 (1897); Zamora v. J. | 2 | 2 |
Purtle v. Sheltongreen2 sentences2003See also Purtle, 474 S.W.2d at 125 (recognizing the fact that "a measure of financial responsibility is required" to drive cars in its decision declining to extend an adult standard of care to an accidental shooting by a juvenile while hunting). [49] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles, supra, § 8 cmt. g. [50] In re S.W.T., 277 N.W.2d at 514 . [51] Id. 2003See also Purtle, 474 S.W.2d at 125 (recognizing the fact that “a measure of financial responsibility is required” to drive cars in its decision declining to extend an adult standard of care to an accidental shooting by a juvenile -while hunting). . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Ransteadgreen1 sentence2021Driving is a dangerous and highly regulated adult activity,42 and the State has an interest in holding traffic violators uniformly accountable for bad driving.43 A 40 State v. Ranstead, 421 P.3d 15, 20 (Alaska 2018). 41 See Planned Parenthood of the Great Nw. v. State, 375 P.3d 1122, 1137 (Alaska 2016). 42 See Ardinger v. Hummell, 982 P.2d 727, 731 (Alaska 1999) (“Children who physically control vehicles must, for public safety reasons, be held to an adult standard of care.”). 43 Cf. Titus v. State, Dep’t of Admin., Div. of Motor Vehicles, 305 P.3d 1271 , (continued...) -11- 7533 uniform penal | 1 | 1 |
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Driving is a dangerous and highly regulated adult activity,42 and the State has an interest in holding traffic violators uniformly accountable for bad driving.43 A 40 State v. Ranstead, 421 P.3d 15, 20 (Alaska 2018). 41 See Planned Parenthood of the Great Nw. v. State, 375 P.3d 1122, 1137 (Alaska 2016). 42 See Ardinger v. Hummell, 982 P.2d 727, 731 (Alaska 1999) (“Children who physically control vehicles must, for public safety reasons, be held to an adult standard of care.”). 43 Cf. Titus v. State, Dep’t of Admin., Div. of Motor Vehicles, 305 P.3d 1271 , (continued...) -11- 7533 uniform penal | 1 | 1 |
State v. Oaksgreen1 sentence2015Id. at 166. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Inman
green
2 sentences2003Korber & Co., 59 N.M. 33 , 278 P.2d 569, 571 (1954); Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331 , 135 A.2d 395, 401-02 (1957). [40] 282 Or. 279 , 578 P.2d 399 (1978). [41] Id. at 401 . [42] Id. at 403 . [43] Id. [44] Id. [45] Id. [46] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles § 8 (Discussion Draft 1999). [47] Id. § 8 cmt. f. [48] Id. § 8 cmt. g. 2003Korber & Co., 59 N.M. 33 , 278 P.2d 569, 571 (1954); Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331 , 135 A.2d 395, 401-02 (1957). [40] 282 Or. 279 , 578 P.2d 399 (1978). [41] Id. at 401 . [42] Id. at 403 . [43] Id. [44] Id. [45] Id. [46] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles § 8 (Discussion Draft 1999). [47] Id. § 8 cmt. f. [48] Id. § 8 cmt. g. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles
green
1 sentence2021Driving is a dangerous and highly regulated adult activity,42 and the State has an interest in holding traffic violators uniformly accountable for bad driving.43 A 40 State v. Ranstead, 421 P.3d 15, 20 (Alaska 2018). 41 See Planned Parenthood of the Great Nw. v. State, 375 P.3d 1122, 1137 (Alaska 2016). 42 See Ardinger v. Hummell, 982 P.2d 727, 731 (Alaska 1999) (“Children who physically control vehicles must, for public safety reasons, be held to an adult standard of care.”). 43 Cf. Titus v. State, Dep’t of Admin., Div. of Motor Vehicles, 305 P.3d 1271 , (continued...) -11- 7533 uniform penal | 1 | 2021–2021 |
JR v. State
green
2 sentences2015J.R. was the appeal of a minor who was prosecuted under the juvenile delinquency laws for second-degree murder under the theory that he acted with "extreme indifference to the value of human life" when he urged a friend to commit murder, and instructed the friend on how to use a shotgun. 3 This Court held that when the jury assessed whether J.R. acted with extreme indifference to the value of life, the jury should have been told to evaluate J.R.'s conduct "against the standard of a reasonable person of his age, intelligence, and experience", rather than against an adult standard. 62 P.3d at 11 2015(As we have explained, the defendant in J.R. was charged with second-degree murder under the theory that he acted with extreme or heightened recklessness-described by the statute as "extreme indifference to the value of human life".) We held that, given the circumstances of J.R.'s case, the jury should have been instructed to apply a lesser standard of care: that J.R.'s degree of recklessness should have been evaluated "against the standard of a reasonable person of his age, intelligence, and experience", rather than against an adult standard. 62 P.3d at 119 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re the Welfare of S. W. T.
green
2 sentences2003See also Purtle, 474 S.W.2d at 125 (recognizing the fact that "a measure of financial responsibility is required" to drive cars in its decision declining to extend an adult standard of care to an accidental shooting by a juvenile while hunting). [49] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles, supra, § 8 cmt. g. [50] In re S.W.T., 277 N.W.2d at 514 . [51] Id. 2003See also Purtle, 474 S.W.2d at 125 (recognizing the fact that "a measure of financial responsibility is required" to drive cars in its decision declining to extend an adult standard of care to an accidental shooting by a juvenile while hunting). [49] Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles, supra, § 8 cmt. g. [50] In re S.W.T., 277 N.W.2d at 514 . [51] Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
KRIEGER BY KRIEGER v. Howell
green
2 sentences1991See Prosser and Keeton, Prosser and Keeton on Torts 181 (5th ed. 1984); Krieger v. Howell, 109 Idaho 704 , 710 P.2d 614 (1985). 1991See Prosser and Keeton, Prosser and Keeton on Torts 181 (5th ed. 1984); Krieger v. Howell, 109 Idaho 704 , 710 P.2d 614 (1985). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.