Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1979–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. Lindsaygreen2 sentences1995"The overwhelming majority of jurisdictions hold minors to an adult standard in determining whether their conduct while engaging in an adult activity is negligent." Id. at 1105 (citing Robinson v. Lindsay, 20 Wash.App. 207 , 579 P.2d 398 (1978), aff'd, 92 Wash.2d 410 , 598 P.2d 392 (1979)); Prosser, Law of Torts, § 32, pp. 156-57 (4th ed. 1971); Annot., 97 A.L.R.2d 872 (1964). 1995"The overwhelming majority of jurisdictions hold minors to an adult standard in determining whether their conduct while engaging in an adult activity is negligent." Id. at 1105 (citing Robinson v. Lindsay, 20 Wash.App. 207 , 579 P.2d 398 (1978), aff'd, 92 Wash.2d 410 , 598 P.2d 392 (1979)); Prosser, Law of Torts, § 32, pp. 156-57 (4th ed. 1971); Annot., 97 A.L.R.2d 872 (1964). | 1 | 2 |
McIsaac v. Monte Carlo Club, Inc.green1 sentence1995See § 491, Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965): "Any one of several persons engaged in a joint enterprise ... is barred from recovering against ... other persons by the negligence of any member of the group." See also McIsaac v. Monte Carlo Club, Inc, 587 So.2d 320, 326 (Ala.1991) (Houston, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part and arguing for the application of "the doctrine of complicity"). | 1 | 1 |
Wittmeier v. Postgreen2 sentences1979See Wittmeier v. Post , 78 S.D. 520 , 105 N.W.2d 65 (1960). 1979See Wittmeier v. Post , 78 S.D. 520 , 105 N.W.2d 65 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gunnells v. Dethrage
green
2 sentences1996The railroad cites Gunnells v. Dethrage , 366 So.2d 1104 (Ala. 1979), in which a minor fell asleep while operating an automobile on a public highway, struck a bridge abutment, and injured his minor passenger. 1995"The overwhelming majority of jurisdictions hold minors to an adult standard in determining whether their conduct while engaging in an adult activity is negligent." Id. at 1105 (citing Robinson v. Lindsay, 20 Wash.App. 207 , 579 P.2d 398 (1978), aff'd, 92 Wash.2d 410 , 598 P.2d 392 (1979)); Prosser, Law of Torts, § 32, pp. 156-57 (4th ed. 1971); Annot., 97 A.L.R.2d 872 (1964). | 3 | 1980–1996 |
Moran v. Burbine
green
2 sentences1991In the adult context the Supreme Court has held that an adult need not be advised of his attorney’s presence in another room where the adult has not requested an attorney [citing Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 , 106 S.Ct. 1135 , 89 L.Ed.2d 410 (1986)].... [S]ome state courts have held that the adult rule is inappropriate in application to juveniles and that a juvenile must be advised of the presence of the parent [citing cases from Maryland, California, and Illinois]. 1991In the adult context the Supreme Court has held that an adult need not be advised of his attorney’s presence in another room where the adult has not requested an attorney [citing Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 , 106 S.Ct. 1135 , 89 L.Ed.2d 410 (1986)].... [S]ome state courts have held that the adult rule is inappropriate in application to juveniles and that a juvenile must be advised of the presence of the parent [citing cases from Maryland, California, and Illinois]. | 2 | 1991–1991 |
Robinson v. Lindsay
green
2 sentences1995"The overwhelming majority of jurisdictions hold minors to an adult standard in determining whether their conduct while engaging in an adult activity is negligent." Id. at 1105 (citing Robinson v. Lindsay, 20 Wash.App. 207 , 579 P.2d 398 (1978), aff'd, 92 Wash.2d 410 , 598 P.2d 392 (1979)); Prosser, Law of Torts, § 32, pp. 156-57 (4th ed. 1971); Annot., 97 A.L.R.2d 872 (1964). 1995"The overwhelming majority of jurisdictions hold minors to an adult standard in determining whether their conduct while engaging in an adult activity is negligent." Id. at 1105 (citing Robinson v. Lindsay, 20 Wash.App. 207 , 579 P.2d 398 (1978), aff'd, 92 Wash.2d 410 , 598 P.2d 392 (1979)); Prosser, Law of Torts, § 32, pp. 156-57 (4th ed. 1971); Annot., 97 A.L.R.2d 872 (1964). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.