Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones Ex Rel. Castor v. Cartergreen2 sentences2006Castor v. Carter, 336 S.C. 110, 117 , 518 S.E.2d 619, 622 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Smalls, 325 S.C. 547, 556 , 481 S.E.2d 444, 449 (Ct.App.1997). 2006Castor v. Carter, 336 S.C. 110, 117 , 518 S.E.2d 619, 622 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Smalls, 325 S.C. 547, 556 , 481 S.E.2d 444, 449 (Ct.App.1997). | 3 | 3 |
Brown v. Smallsgreen2 sentences2006This court, in Brown v. Smalls, 325 S.C. 547 , 481 S.E.2d 444 (Ct.App.1997), suggested the following charge in regard to minors under the age of fourteen: A child under the age of fourteen years is not required to conform to an adult standard of care. 2006This court, in Brown v. Smalls, 325 S.C. 547 , 481 S.E.2d 444 (Ct.App.1997), suggested the following charge in regard to minors under the age of fourteen: A child under the age of fourteen years is not required to conform to an adult standard of care. | 2 | 4 |
Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.green2 sentences2016However, this rule does not authorize submission of speculative, theoretical, and hypothetical views to the jury.") (quoting Small v. Pioneer Mach., Inc., 329 S.C. 448, 461 , 494 S.E.2d 835, 841 (Ct. App. 1997))); Hancock v. Mid-S. Mgmt. 2016However, this rule does not authorize submission of speculative, theoretical, and hypothetical views to the jury.") (quoting Small v. Pioneer Mach., Inc., 329 S.C. 448, 461 , 494 S.E.2d 835, 841 (Ct. App. 1997))); Hancock v. Mid-S. Mgmt. | 1 | 1 |
Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Muhammad v. Conradgreen2 sentences2016As to Appellant's argument that the circuit court erred in applying an adult standard to John Doe: Jensen v. Conrad, 292 S.C. 169, 172 , 355 S.E.2d 291, 293 (Ct. App. 1987) ("A judgment will not be reversed for insubstantial errors not affecting the result."); Jackson v. Bermuda Sands, Inc., 383 S.C. 11, 17 , 677 S.E.2d 612, 616 (Ct. App. 2009) ("A jury issue is created when there is material evidence tending to establish the issue in the mind of a reasonable juror. 2016As to Appellant's argument that the circuit court erred in applying an adult standard to John Doe: Jensen v. Conrad, 292 S.C. 169, 172 , 355 S.E.2d 291, 293 (Ct. App. 1987) ("A judgment will not be reversed for insubstantial errors not affecting the result."); Jackson v. Bermuda Sands, Inc., 383 S.C. 11, 17 , 677 S.E.2d 612, 616 (Ct. App. 2009) ("A jury issue is created when there is material evidence tending to establish the issue in the mind of a reasonable juror. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Bermuda Sands, Inc.green2 sentences2016As to Appellant's argument that the circuit court erred in applying an adult standard to John Doe: Jensen v. Conrad, 292 S.C. 169, 172 , 355 S.E.2d 291, 293 (Ct. App. 1987) ("A judgment will not be reversed for insubstantial errors not affecting the result."); Jackson v. Bermuda Sands, Inc., 383 S.C. 11, 17 , 677 S.E.2d 612, 616 (Ct. App. 2009) ("A jury issue is created when there is material evidence tending to establish the issue in the mind of a reasonable juror. 2016As to Appellant's argument that the circuit court erred in applying an adult standard to John Doe: Jensen v. Conrad, 292 S.C. 169, 172 , 355 S.E.2d 291, 293 (Ct. App. 1987) ("A judgment will not be reversed for insubstantial errors not affecting the result."); Jackson v. Bermuda Sands, Inc., 383 S.C. 11, 17 , 677 S.E.2d 612, 616 (Ct. App. 2009) ("A jury issue is created when there is material evidence tending to establish the issue in the mind of a reasonable juror. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Standard v. Shine
green
2 sentences2006Of course, a child of tender years is not required to conform to an adult standard of care .... [A] minor's conduct should be judged by the standard of behavior to be expected of a child of like age, intelligence, and experience under like circumstances." Id. at 339 , 295 S.E.2d at 787 ; accord Jones ex rel. 2006Of course, a child of tender years is not required to conform to an adult standard of care .... [A] minor's conduct should be judged by the standard of behavior to be expected of a child of like age, intelligence, and experience under like circumstances." Id. at 339 , 295 S.E.2d at 787 ; accord Jones ex rel. | 3 | 1999–2006 |
McCormick v. Campbell Ex Rel. Campbell
neutral
2 sentences1996McCormick v. Campbell, 285 S.C. 272 , 329 S.E.2d 752 (1985). 1996McCormick v. Campbell, 285 S.C. 272 , 329 S.E.2d 752 (1985). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.