adult rule (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

adult rule in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Baxter v. Downeygreen
fladistctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Admin. 2.514(a)(3); see also Baxter v. Downey, 581 So. 2d 596, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (explaining that the the adult rule is nearly identical to the juvenile rule at issue here, and rule 2.514 is used to compute time under both rules.

11
Medina v. McAllistergreen
fla · 1967 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1970–1970
1 sentence

1970See Medina v. McAllister, Fla.1967, 202 So.2d 755 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Capuzzo v. State green
fla · 1992
1 sentence

2019Capuzzo, 596 So. 2d at 439-40 .

12019–2019
Bonds v. Fleming neutral
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1999It further explained that “Bonds should have know his voluntary inebriation would diminish his appreciation for automobile safety measures including a seat belt.” Id. at 585 .

11999–1999
AA v. Rolle green
fla · 1992
1 sentence

1998Because appellant was under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, we conclude that the trial court erred by sentencing her as an adult for violation of a court order imposed while she was under the age of eighteen. 1 In A.A. v. Rolle, 604 So.2d 813 (Fla.1992), the supreme court held that a juvenile could not be punished for contempt by being placed in a secure detention facility. 2 In that case, the court acknowledged that it is within the legislature’s province to “determine how and to what extent the courts may punish criminal conduct, including contempt” reasoning: ...

11998–1998

Where else courts name it

WA 29 (1978–2026) TX 11 (1958–2022) OH 9 (1998–2024) CA 7 (1975–2023) IL 7 (1977–2003) MI 6 (1982–2022) SC 6 (1996–2016) AK 6 (1991–2021) AL 6 (1979–1996) IN 5 (1911–1997) PA 5 (1968–2020) FL 5 (1970–2019) TN 4 (1977–2003) MN 4 (1979–1998) NJ 4 (1976–1988) NE 3 (1978–2019) OK 3 (1972–1976) NH 3 (1966–1986) NM 3 (1965–2015) NY 3 (1977–1983) WI 3 (1984–2002) AR 3 (1909–1990) MO 3 (1984–2015) DC 3 (1978–1990) UT 3 (1995–2024) ME 3 (1981–1981) AZ 2 (1974–1977) KY 2 (1964–1968) ID 2 (1977–1985) LA 2 (1989–2014) CT 2 (1973–1998) OR 2 (1978–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check