Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cook v. State
green
2 sentences1999We stated: "The defendant argues that the court erred in finding that the murder was committed for pecuniary gain and cites Ex parte Cook , 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978), rehearing denied, opinion corrected, February 9, 1979. 1999We stated: “The defendant argues that the court erred in finding that the murder was committed for pecuniary gain and cites Ex parte Cook, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978), rehearing denied, opinion correet- . ed, February 9,1979. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Ex Parte Rice
green
2 sentences1999The defendant raised as a defense that the contract was illegal, arguing that its "purpose was to engage in a monopoly in violation of the state and federal law." 259 Ala. at 572 , 67 So.2d at 826 . 1999The defendant raised as a defense that the contract was illegal, arguing that its "purpose was to engage in a monopoly in violation of the state and federal law." 259 Ala. at 572 , 67 So.2d at 826 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Moody v. Rambo
green
1 sentence2001Mattie also cites Moody v. Rambo , 727 So.2d 116 (Ala.Civ.App. 1999), in which the defendant raised the doctrine of res judicata as a defense, a defense not raised in the original answer, in his motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claims. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Reid v. WARDEN, CENT. PRISON, RALEIGH, NC
neutral
1 sentence1991Nor need we decide whether such language permits federal review where the defendant raised the claim at trial, thus making it more likely that the state appellate court came across the claim during its review of the record." See also Reid v. Warden, Central Prison, 708 F.Supp. 730 (W.D.N.C.1989). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.