Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Peacock v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Peacock v. State , 77 S.W.3d 285, 288 (Tex. Crim. 2008See Peacock v. State, 77 S.W.3d 285, 288 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Edwards v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Edwards v. State, 497 S.W.3d 147, 164 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, pet. ref’d). 12 Other appellate courts have modified trial-court judgments when confronted with facially erroneous judgments assessing punishment at life, rather than life without parole, including when neither the state nor the defendant raised the error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Kathy Evelyn Willis
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 173–74. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Landers v. State
green
1 sentence2016In Landers , the defendant challenged the trial court's sua sponte imposition of attorneys fees for the prosecutor pro tem. 402 S.W.3d at 255 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Johnson, Manley Dewayne
green
1 sentence2016In Johnson , the defendant raised a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the imposed costs. 423 S.W.3d 385 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Henry v. State
green
2 sentences1992It is true that in Henry , *380 also involving a trial that occurred prior to Batson , the defendant raised a claim that the State's use of peremptory challenges to strike minority veniremen violated his "right to trial by a cross section of the community." 729 S.W.2d at 733 . 1992It is true that in Hen ry, also involving a trial that occurred prior to Batson , the defendant raised a claim that the State’s use of peremptory challenges to strike minority veniremen violated his “right to trial by a cross section of the community.” 729 S.W.2d at 733 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.