interspousal immunity (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

interspousal immunity in Iowa

6 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Shook v. Crabbgreen
iowa · 1979 · cited in 3 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1980–2010
2 sentences

2010Shook v. Crabb, 281 N.W.2d 616, 620 (Iowa 1979) (relying on the fundamental public policy that courts should afford redress for civil wrongs and rejecting the proposition that the doctrine of interspousal immunity involved determinations of public policy most appropriately made by the legislature).

2010Shook v. Crabb, 281 N.W.2d 616, 620 (Iowa 1979) (relying on the fundamental public policy that courts should afford redress for civil wrongs and rejecting the proposition that the doctrine of interspousal immunity involved determinations of public policy most appropriately made by the legislature).

23
Rogers v. Yellowstone Park Companygreen
idaho · 1975 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11
Smith v. Smithgreen
or · 1955 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (40)

CaseCitedYears
Rains v. Rains green
colo · 1935
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Bushnell v. Bushnell green
conn · 1925
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Brooks v. Robinson green
ind · 1972
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Aldrich v. Tracy green
iowa · 1936
2 sentences

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage’s Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage’s Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

11979–1979
In Re Estate of Dolmage green
iowa · 1927
2 sentences

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage’s Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage’s Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

11979–1979
Wright v. Daniels green
iowa · 1969
2 sentences

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage’s Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage's Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

11979–1979
Moulton v. Moulton green
me · 1973
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O'Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Jacobs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. green
nysupct · 1956
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O'Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Foster v. Foster green
nc · 1965
2 sentences

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

11979–1979
Leach v. Leach green
ark · 1957
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. Stienne green
nev · 1974
11979–1979
Beaudette v. Frana green
minn · 1969
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Maestas v. Overton green
nm · 1975
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Brown v. Gosser green
kyctapphigh · 1953
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O'Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Richard v. Richard green
vt · 1973
2 sentences

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

11979–1979
Lewis v. Lewis green
mass · 1976
11979–1979
Flogel v. Flogel green
iowa · 1965
11979–1979
O'GRADY v. Potts green
kan · 1964
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Bounds v. Caudle green
tex · 1977
2 sentences

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. *619 Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va.,

11979–1979
Windauer v. O'CONNOR green
ariz · 1971
11979–1979
Cramer v. Cramer green
alaska · 1963
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O'Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Klein v. Klein green
cal · 1962
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Hosko v. Hosko green
mich · 1971
11979–1979
Freehe v. Freehe green
wash · 1972
2 sentences

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

11979–1979
Thompson v. Thompson green
nh · 1963
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Imig v. March green
neb · 1979
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O'Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Digby v. Digby green
ri · 1978
2 sentences

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. *619 Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va.,

11979–1979
Merenoff v. Merenoff green
nj · 1978
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Lusby v. Lusby green
md · 1978
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Bennett v. Bennett green
ala · 1932
2 sentences

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

1979A survey of existing case law evidences a definite trend toward abolishing in toto or limiting in part application of the doctrine of interspousal immunity due to the fundamental policy consideration of providing judicial redress for an otherwise cognizable wrong, and a concomitant rejection of the arguments advanced in support of the doctrine: Bennett v. Bennett, 224 Ala. 335 , 140 So. 378 (1932); Cramer v. Cramer, 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963); Windauer v. O’Connor, 107 Ariz. 267 , 485 P.2d 1157 (1971); Leach v. Leach, 227 Ark. 599 , 300 S.W.2d 15 (1957); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 , 26 Cal.R

11979–1979
Peters v. Peters green
iowa · 1875
2 sentences

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage’s Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

1979Wright v. Daniels, 164 N.W.2d 180 (Iowa 1969); Flogel v. Flogel, 257 Iowa 547 , 133 N.W.2d 907 (1965); Aldrich v. Tracy, 222 Iowa 84 , 269 N.W. 30 (1936); In re Dolmage's Estate, 203 Iowa 231 , 212 N.W. 553 (1927); Peters v. Peters, 42 Iowa 182 (1875).

11979–1979
Courtney v. Courtney green
okla · 1938
11979–1979
Surratt, Adm'r v. Thompson green
va · 1971
11979–1979
Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer green
wva · 1978
11979–1979
Pardue v. Pardue green
sc · 1932
11979–1979
Scotvold v. Scotvold green
sd · 1941
2 sentences

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

11979–1979
Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice green
nd · 1932
2 sentences

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

1979S.2d 128 (1956); Foster v. Foster, 264 N.C. 694 , 142 S.E.2d 638 (1965); Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice, 62 N.D. 191 , 242 N.W. 526 (1932); Courtney v. Courtney, 184 Okl. 395 , 87 P.2d 660 (1938); Digby v. Digby, R.I., 388 A.2d 1 (1978); Pardue v. Pardue, 167 S.C. 129 , 166 S.E. 101 (1932); Scotvold v. Scotvold, 68 S.D. 53 , 298 N.W. 266 (1941); Bounds v. Caudle, 560 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.1977); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Richard v. Richard, 131 Vt. 98 , 300 A.2d 637 (1973); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Coffindaffer v. Coffindaffer, W.Va., 244 S.

11979–1979
Mosier v. Carney green
mich · 1965
11969–1969
Zarrella v. Miller green
ri · 1966
11967–1967
Second Congregational Society v. Hugh Stubbins & Associates green
nh · 1968
11967–1967

Where else courts name it

FL 55 (1972–2019) MD 29 (1983–2022) NJ 28 (1958–2020) TX 24 (1972–2022) GA 18 (1979–2024) MO 18 (1960–2001) IL 15 (1975–2018) OH 12 (1978–1992) IN 12 (1971–2005) PA 8 (1971–1981) AZ 8 (1974–2022) LA 7 (1964–2000) KS 7 (1981–2006) WV 6 (1977–1998) IA 6 (1967–2010) DE 6 (1979–1997) MI 5 (1971–1998) WA 5 (1979–2004) TN 5 (1983–1987) MA 4 (1976–1983) RI 4 (1978–2006) VA 4 (1971–1980) OK 3 (2023–2023) MS 3 (1988–1993) NV 3 (1974–1977) CA 3 (1962–1992) ID 3 (1975–1989) ME 3 (1982–1993) MN 2 (1969–2012) ND 2 (1972–1994) NE 2 (1984–2002) NM 2 (1981–1987) AK 2 (1973–2001) UT 2 (1988–1989) NH 2 (1969–1978)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check